medicineman
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 6,744
- Points
- 1,110
Wasn't Tulsi Gabbard already invited?Damn. One of the recipients was in Russia while the strikes were going on, so I apologize, perhaps the KGB was invited after all.
Wasn't Tulsi Gabbard already invited?Damn. One of the recipients was in Russia while the strikes were going on, so I apologize, perhaps the KGB was invited after all.
Nyet nyet tovarisch KGB not get invite. Stoopid TulsiWasn't Tulsi Gabbard already invited?
I am convinced we live in some sick simulation, JFC.
so how close to 100% is the probability that they'll try to pin this on the guy who actually reported it?I am convinced we live in some sick simulation, JFC.
I am convinced we live in some sick simulation, JFC.
My working hypothesis is that DJT is actually Andy Kaufman and this whole thing is a massive piece of performance art.
Or we're just in a spinoff of "Free Guy"...My working hypothesis is that DJT is actually Andy Kaufman and this whole thing is a massive piece of performance art.
The intelligence assessment was presented Tuesday at the Senate Intelligence Committee’s hearing on the annual Worldwide Threat report, where top intelligence officials including Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe testified. It comes as the Trump administration has been pressing both sides to stop the fighting.
Gabbard testified that:
Gabbard and FBI Director Kash Patel also elevated crime and drugs brought by migrants into the US as one of the major threats to the US, in keeping with Trump’s priority on sealing US borders.
- China: The intelligence community assesses “that China is our most capable, strategic competitor. Under the leadership of President Xi Jinping, the People’s Republic of China seeks to position itself as a leading power on the world stage, economically, technologically and militarily.”
- Iran: Intelligence agencies continue to “assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khomeini has not authorized a nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.”
- Climate Change: The new report appears to have eliminated any reference to the threat from climate change, which was cited in last year’s report as placing more of the world’s population at risk. Gabbard testified that the latest report focused instead “on the most extreme and direct threats” to national security.
On the war that began with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, Trump administration officials are aiming to reach a full ceasefire as soon as April 20, Bloomberg reported previously, but that timeline has been seen by Ukrainian and European officials as overly ambitious given moves by President Vladimir Putin that appear to be aimed at prolonging the discussions.
According to the White House, Russia and Ukraine agreed Tuesday on implementing partial ceasefires to protect civilian navigation in the Black Sea and to “develop measures” to ban strikes against energy facilities in Ukraine and Russia.
For Putin, “positive battlefield trends allow for some strategic patience, and for Ukraine, conceding territory or neutrality to Russia without substantial security guarantees from the West could prompt domestic backlash and future insecurity,” according to the annual intelligence assessment.
Nonetheless, both Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy probably understand the risks of a prolonged war. A protracted conflict could drag down the Russian economy and risks “undesired escalation with the West,” while for Ukraine, Zelenskiy likely understands that the future of western assistance is uncertain, the report found.
Moscow also retains the momentum on the battlefield as a grinding war of attrition plays to Russia’s military advantages and “will lead to a gradual but steady erosion of Kyiv’s position on the battlefield, regardless of any U.S. or allied attempts to impose new and greater costs on Moscow.”
The US intelligence community also continues to see a risk that Putin may resort to nuclear weapons. “Russia’s inability to achieve quick and decisive battlefield wins, coupled with Ukrainian strikes within Russia, continues to drive concerns that Putin might use nuclear weapons,” according to the assessment.
He is a performative support for the party’s most essential command.They do not. Musk is a clown; he’s not the least bit well qualified for that work, or to identify who should do it. The U.S. has some of the best cybersecurity professionals in the world working in various agencies. These are tasks for the pros. However, it will start with the cyber security equivalents of “is it plugged in? Is it turned on?”
They haven’t been shit-canned by DOGE yet?The U.S. has some of the best cybersecurity professionals in the world working in various agencies. These are tasks for the pros. However, it will start with the cyber security equivalents of “is it plugged in? Is it turned on?”
Well, that aged well.We are currently clean on OPSEC
No, but for a billion dollars stipend he can convince the easily convinced that the reporter (or Biden, or Hilary, or Trudeau, or Greenland) actually hacked into the super-secret conversation.Do they really need Elon Musk to invent a new solution to a problem that doesn't exist if they just use existing IT and security protocols? Tabernak this guy is a grifter.
They did but they required some parts from some Aussie F18’s in order to fly.Did the F18s win?