Drif10 said:
Mukluks. Pride of '91. Same for the mitts. "They're still serviceable.."
Absolutely!! That's the exact same arctic kit us Army folk get!! There is no new crap other than this. So, you have what you are entitled to. What do you mean by being stuck with the old kit?? This
IS the arctic kit.
Got the new cadpat. Tuque? Balaclave? Neck gaiter? Fleece? Cold weather gloves? "Not entitled"
Tuque, fleece balaclava, neck gaiter, fleece, cold weather gloves ... "not entilted"
100% correct again you are!! It works like this --
Imagine that you are an ARMY guy who's going out to the field in the pouring friggin' rain and you go into clothing stores and ask to exchange your olive drab rain gear for some cadpat raingear. Makes sense right? Well no, you'd NOT be entitled to it ... you see that cadpat raingear is Air Force kit from the Air Force's CEMS (Clothing & Equipment Millenium Standard) project which is bought and paid for using Air Force Budget monies. (Fleece, that includes the balaclava and neck gaiter BTW, -- it's not anti-stat so it's not on the Air Force scale ... is that the Sup Techs fault too??)
Just like the items above are Army CTS (Clothe the Soldier items) project items bought and paid for using Army Budget monies. So you, as an Air Force guy, are not entitled to it ... just like the Air Force won't issue their rain gear to some Army guy in an Army Unit.
Does this make sense to me ... sometimes it does -- you get what your enviornment pays for. Your CO wants to address it -- then he/she should be going after the Air Force to buy it for you. Certainly complaining to the Army that they won't issue you their kit is barking up the wrong tree -- after all, you wouldn't share the raingear.
Even without going north of 60, we live in Canada, ferchrissakes. Think that might be stuff that everyone might need here in the winter? "Not entitled". When every PTE coming in off their threes has all the gear, and someone who's been in twenty can't get it. Same goes for the militia guys. They get it, we don't.
Bud, stop it now. I did 7 months in Alert as the Zippo. The ONLY person on the station who was required to go outside each and every day, regardless of weather, year round. I was outside for hours at a time ... in -64 temps so that there'd be fuel in that day tank to keep everyone toasty warm and with electricity. It was 1998. I didn't have gortex!! I lived to tell about it!! You've got your gortex!! What gear are you talking about?? Mukluks and arctic mitts are the arctic gear and that's what you have!! Wet weather boots are NOT arctic boots -- trust me on that one -- I've actually got them (being that I'm Army and all). Surely to hell, you'll survive in nice old Trenton ... in those artic mitts and mukluks.
We have army guys get posted in, can't draw gear because "the army is supposed to kit you guys".
Army guys serving in Air Ops positions are not entitled to the Army Operational Clothing Scale (D01-301). They are issued their gortex etc by the Air Force. Look around you some more ... they even have CADPAT RAINGEAR; the lucky fellas. An Army girl like me, posted in Trenton, is not entitled to a ruck sack ... tac vest etc (not like I actually had to utilize them there) ...
The stuff in quotes are comments I personally witnessed.
Absolutely. The quotes are correct. If some Army guy on an Air Base ... in an Air Force position wants a rucksack or other Army Op kit ... the Air Force is going to have to build a scale of entitlement and have it approved based on there actually being a requirement for him to have that kit while serving there in that Air Force position.
As for the pte's in supply in Trenton, there's a couple of them that could seriously use some attitude adjusting. Their language and attitudes in dealing with customers has been appalling, to not only their peers but all the way up the rank chain. More than once I witnessed a captain or a sargeant get treated with ignorant comments and derision when trying to get kit exchanged. Because the pte had the power to tell them no, they sucked it up and got through the process, not necessarily leaving with the kit they needed.
I'd have said no to if they weren't entitled to the damn stuff. Saying no does NOT constitute "having a bad attitude" or "being ignorant" ... it just means that you aren't entitled to it -- kind of like what I'd have said to you when you asked for the new arctic kit -- which, hopefully, you now realize DOESN'T even EXIST.
#1 What did you do about it? and
#2 I've yet to meet a MCpl (or a Pte) who needed an attitude adjustment, or a customer for that matter ... it's always the 911ers fault. That's why we have such big shoulders for those who note our bad attitudes to cry on. :
In most cases, the spy techs I've dealt with have been good folks, trying to deal with what looks to be one seriously f%&^%d up system. Sucks that some are poisoning the well.
And the
'emphasis-mine' bit above, only serves to reinforce #2 above. Your damn right I'm confrontational -- especially when people like you attempt to perpetrate the stereotypical myths because you are misinformed and have no desire to educate yourself.
Most clothing stores have a mirror right inside the door ... next time you go over there ... perhaps you should have a look in it and sort yourself out before you choke on your very own little poisoned pill -- just in case the clothing Pte's First Aid qualification may be expired. Tell Rebekah that I said hello ... and be sure to tell her which of her Pte's needs the attitude adjustment.
(Edited to add: never mind -- I'll send her the link to this thread.)
Have a great day.