- Reaction score
- 19,291
- Points
- 1,280
Fair - and in all of the services the Army (and especially the Combat Arms) that would be the most appropriate use of the term, even if I fundamentally disagree with it.Me too but for different reasons.
In my opinion everything from the get go is about establishing a hierarchy and pecking order. Kids on their infantry DP1 will brag about being "rifleman number 1"
In a light infantry battalion it's rifle company -> jump company-> recce platoon -> sniper or pathfinder.
I see the "you're a warrior" stuff as low hanging fruit the CoC uses for that we'rebetter than X stuff. Years later I recall an infantry OC giving that warrior speech to us while on an American base prior to an attack. I looked over and seen the kid who didn't bring his jacket or sleeping back to the desert/mountains sitting there picking his nose and eating it and thinking to myself "yeah, right".
But how about the techs fixing aircraft? The FSAs processing claims? Or, in the US, the Space Force folks? I would argue that while they have a place in the overall “warfighting” culture, they are not warriors nor warfighters, and should not be termed so.
Should the Space Force Have a Warfighting-Centric Culture? | Aerospace Center for Space Policy and Strategy
The Space Force plays a significant and unique role in securing U.S. national interests. How should warfighting fit into the Space Force culture?
csps.aerospace.org