• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canadian Foreign Interference (General)

That also has most of corporate America in that pic.
Because all of us in North America love cheap stuff and China makes it cheap. IF China were to pay wages similar to what North American workers receive, we wouldn't be buying from China.
And don't get me started on their "justice" system.....
 
And then there is the Russians and harder interference.


One of the most dramatic Russian espionage cases in Britain has concluded with guilty verdicts. Three Bulgarian nationals associated with Wirecard fraud mastermind Jan Marsalek, who settled in Russia in 2020, have been found guilty of espionage. These convicted spies carried out a surveillance campaign against Bulgarian-born Bellingcat journalist Christo Grozev, who exposed grizzly details about Russia’s 2020 poisoning of opposition leader Alexey Navalny.

Despite the exodus of Kremlin-connected Russians from London and the stiffening of Britain’s National Security Act in 2023, the threat of Russian espionage looms large. In October 2024, MI5 chief Ken McCallum warned that Russian intelligence agencies were on a mission to create “sustained mayhem on British and European streets.” McCallum asserted that Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) had carried out arson attacks and sabotage operations in Britain as revenge for British support for Ukraine.

How does Russia carry out espionage on British soil? Through a wide variety of conventional and unexpected means. The most predictable stream of espionage runs through the scaled-down Russian Embassy in London. In May 2024, Britain expelled the Russian Embassy defence attache for being an undeclared military intelligence officer. Russian diplomatic properties Seacox Heath in Sussex and the Trade Defence Section in Highgate historically served as launchpads for Russian spying operations.

Another form of espionage results from the recruitment of disgruntled British government employees. In February 2023, Royal Air Force (RAF) veteran David Smith was jailed for thirteen years for passing on the names, phone numbers and addresses of his colleagues at the British Embassy in Berlin to a Russian general. A MI5 sting operation derailed Smith’s scheme but Russia’s recruitment efforts remain a clear-and-present danger.

Aside from these time-tested methods, Russia has experimented with a diverse array of new espionage tactics. The first is cyber-espionage. Russia has used spear-phishing to access information about British citizens and organisations. The FSB-linked Star Blizzard actor has targeted British politicians, NGOs and academics since 2019. It reels in unsuspecting targets with customised email outreaches and exports malware to carry out data harvesting on British nationals. FSB Centre 18, which oversees the Star Blizzard hacks, has stepped up its political interference campaign in Britain and leaked some secret political documents.

The second is to capitalise on the proliferation of private intelligence and security consultancy firms in Britain. In January, the Home Office warned private security professionals to avoid accepting work from Russia, China and Iran, and urged greater due diligence against unwittingly providing information to these hostile actors. The cluster of former British intelligence community personnel who work for these companies make them ripe targets for Russian spies.

The third is to recruit sympathetic foreign nationals. Marsalek preyed on Bulgarian national Orlin Roussev’s fascination with espionage and experience in signals intelligence to convince him to do Russia’s bidding. Roussev found a beautician, painter and decorator, and mixed martial arts fighter from the Bulgarian diaspora to assist in Marsalek’s Kremlin-directed surveillance efforts. Marsalek and Roussev developed schemes to sell US drones to Russia and China, and to target Ukrainian forces training at US facilities in Stuttgart.


What is the difference between UK law and Canadian law in these matters?
 
And then there is the Russians and harder interference.







What is the difference between UK law and Canadian law in these matters?
To put it quite simply the British and their Judicial system take these crimes far more seriously.
 
Back
Top