My father joined in 1940, bummed around Borden and England until 1943, training, and at the age of 20 landed in Sicily, Cpl, crew commanding (well would have been if the ship with the vehicles hadn't been sunk and the regiment hadn't been thrown into the line as infantry, but they did get more cars eventually). Prior to the landing he had no operational experience, yes there were lessons being learnt and hopefully passed back, but hopefully that is happening now too.
As well, the vehicles they were equipped with were changing constantly and included turreted vehicles.
If we could do it then, why cant we do it now?
I realize there are two main points to counter this question; it was wartime and needs must, and modern vehicles are much more complex.
To counter the wartime argument I would say that training techniques have improved since then, hopefully we have learnt how to pass knowledge on more efficiently. If we haven't then maybe we should look at improving how things are taught, rather than requiring more teaching. In teaching I include training, people getting experience outside of both the formal classroom and operational environments.
As far as the complexity of the vehicle, isn't technology supposed to make life easier? Reading this thread, and others, I have gotten the impression that crew commanding is mostly about reading traces, navigating, and maintaining SA. If so, once again the tech should aid this.
So the question I have is, how different is cc'ing a Coyote, while it's on the move, as part of a brigade recce unit from cc'ing a Staghound as part of a corps or div recce unit?
D (who has only cc'd a Bison)