• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Base closures?

2 PPCLI in Winnipeg would be a good example; As long as Lloyd Axworthy help his seat in Winnipeg and the Liberal were in power, they were safe. Once Axworthy and the Liberals were gone, so was the Battalion.
The Liberals lost Winnipeg South Centre in 2011 (Liberals stayed home) after the decision was made to close Kapyong.

That really depends on the base. Some bases are regarded by the local powers that be to be more valuable used for other things, or are even considered a nuisance. The closure of St Hubert was robustly supported by local Montreal-area politicians, as it was felt that the redevelopment would be of greater value.
My understanding is this is what happened to Kapyong Barracks. But instead it is now an urban First Nations reserve. I bet the neighbours are happy about that! I hope they build the biggest, gaudiest casino there between Vegas and Niagara Falls! 😁
 
My understanding is this is what happened to Kapyong Barracks. But instead it is now an urban First Nations reserve. I bet the neighbours are happy about that! I hope they build the biggest, gaudiest casino there between Vegas and Niagara Falls! 😁
Its a grass field right now. And probably will be for years to come
 
Umm what? Maybe nuke , please clarify what I consider to be an off the wall statement.
Not nuclear, the Meaford proposal is pumped-storage hydroelectric.

 
I’d close Meaford tomorrow and move the training centre to Petawawa. No reason to keep a base open so we can make our members move yet again. I’d do the same thing to Wainwright if it weren’t for the training area.
 
I’d close Meaford tomorrow and move the training centre to Petawawa. No reason to keep a base open so we can make our members move yet again. I’d do the same thing to Wainwright if it weren’t for the training area.
What training area space in Petawawa would you gain to accommodate the move? If you haven't looked at the DRSOs lately, Petawawa RTA is slammed 8-10 months of the year.
 
What training area space in Petawawa would you gain to accommodate the move? If you haven't looked at the DRSOs lately, Petawawa RTA is slammed 8-10 months of the year.
You actually don’t need a whole lot of space to run a DP1. If possible run them so they offset with the Bde’s training cycle. Or if that’s not doable, still close Meaford but move the school to Gagetown.
 
You actually don’t need a whole lot of space to run a DP1. If possible run them so they offset with the Bde’s training cycle.
It’s not really the brigade that’s the problem (although in my opinion Petawawa’s infrastructure was never really upgraded enough when 1RCR moved from London). The bigger issue is that Special Operations units train a lot.

Petawawa might not currently have enough manoeuvre and range space to properly accommodate the needs of 2CMBG, CSOR and CSOTC. Adding a divisional training centre doesn’t seem possible.
 
Additionally, Meaford is a very large resource for our Army Reserve folks who need a place to train as well. Not everyone is within driving distance to Petawawa in 4XX

Keep the real estate, keep a few commissionaires to unlock the gates as needed to use the training areas, but close the outsourced base operations and the training centre.
 
Petawawa also used condemned buildings to run paradym or whatever it was called. There's no accommodations or empty training buildings to hold DP1 and they're actively trying to take down old buildings to save money. You're not moving anything to Petawawa without a billion dollar infrastructure update, which wouldn't even address the rest of the archaic buildings there.
 
Petawawa also used condemned buildings to run paradym or whatever it was called. There's no accommodations or empty training buildings to hold DP1sand they're actively trying to take down old buildings to same money. You're not moving anything to Petawawa without a billion dollar infrastructure update, which wouldn't even address the rest of the archaic buildings there.
While infrastructure on most bases is old every time I visit Pet it feels like I am in the ghetto of CAF.
 
While infrastructure on most bases is old every time I visit Pet it feels like I am in the ghetto of CAF.
A decade ago the CAF did an infrastructure survey and it had the 2nd oldest average building age in the CAF behind Kingston which still operates 18th century forts.
 
Additionally, Meaford is a very large resource for our Army Reserve folks who need a place to train as well. Not everyone is within driving distance to Petawawa in 4XX
Meaford is convenient only to Reserve units of 32 CBG and a bit of 31.
 
Meaford is convenient only to Reserve units of 32 CBG and a bit of 31.
I've gone there for a 2 week exercise from Kingston. Very much worth the road move for a relatively quiet training area during the week.
 
Meaford is convenient only to Reserve units of 32 CBG and a bit of 31.
31&32 CBG actually have numbers to justify keeping it, though.

When the QOR and RHFC combined parade more soldiers on a Thursday night than all of 33CBG Infantry "Regiments" combined, you cater to their needs.
 
Petawawa also used condemned buildings to run paradym or whatever it was called. There's no accommodations or empty training buildings to hold DP1 and they're actively trying to take down old buildings to save money. You're not moving anything to Petawawa without a billion dollar infrastructure update, which wouldn't even address the rest of the archaic buildings there.
There’s no transient quarters ? Run it out of a tent city until course shacks can be built. Good god people we can actually built, move, and repurpose things. What is doesn’t have to be what will be.
 
There’s no transient quarters ? Run it out of a tent city until course shacks can be built. Good god people we can actually built, move, and repurpose things. What is doesn’t have to be what will be.
Tent city in the winter isn't going to work that well. I'm all for finding funding solutions but this isn't a "fix it tomorrow" problem. Base closures need to be deliberate and coupled with planned infrastructure spending at the new home. Since we're not going to get new infra money any base closure should be a non starter. I could flippantly suggest we shut down Shilo and move it to Wainwright or vice versa but I think it creates more problems than money it saves.
 
Back
Top