0010bravo said:I leave in 2 weeks to BMQ. Push ups or sand bags is all the same to me. Not worried..
ambernewton04 said:Here is the new testing they do at BMQ, it's called "FORCE"
-Skeletor- said:This test is currently being done in BMQ? What is your source for this info?
ambernewton04 said:I don't know when this will take effect.
ambernewton04 said:Here is the new testing they do at BMQ, it's called "FORCE"
-Skeletor- said:Than why did you say this?
ambernewton04 said:Why, because someone asked about the physical testing. I simply answered that this will be the new testing. It will either start in January or the new fiscal year.
-Skeletor- said:Do you know for FACT that this new test will start in January or the next fiscal year starting in April? Perhaps it won't start until 2014 for BMQ, etc. That's great that you posted the new test info. But do not go around saying that this new test is what is currently being done at CFLRS as you have no idea if it is or not.
In the rest of the CF this test doesn't even really come into effect until 2014. So for those who do the test in 2013, it doesn't matter if they pass/fail in that year.
PMedMoe said:Big difference saying that the PT testing at BMQ is changing and that it could start now or next fiscal year and saying "Here is the new testing they do at BMQ."
ambernewton04 said:You're right, I don't know exactly when
ambernewton04 said:I was simply saying it COULD start now or the new fiscal year.
ambernewton04 said:This is what I have been told by current serving members, who are both officers and have been serving for 30+ years. I have also been told this by the physical trainers at the Petawawa base.
Cool, didn't know Petawawa PSP had classes for BMQ prep.ambernewton04 said:They are currently training people to get them into shape for BMQ.
Actually you did when you stated that the FORCE test is what is being done now in BMQ and again when you changed your argument to it is being done in January or the next fiscal year.ambernewton04 said:I didn't just pull this info out of my a**.
ambernewton04 said:It is a FACT that the physical testing is and will be changing.
Good to see you understand that now. Watch how you phrase things, especially if you are assuming. For something you didn't know as fact, you sure were stubborn/argumentative in defense.ambernewton04 said:You are right, I should have worded that differently. I apologize for any confusion :sorry:
-Skeletor- said:Correct
First you said that FORCE is what is being done now in BMQ, then you changed your answer to it will either start in January or the new fiscal year.
Did they tell you that BMQ courses will start doing the FORCE test now, or in the new fiscal year? Or did they just say that a new PT test is coming out in the next fiscal year?
Cool, didn't know Petawawa PSP had classes for BMQ prep.
Actually you did when you stated that the FORCE test is what is being done now in BMQ and again when you changed your argument to it is being done in January or the next fiscal year.
It is a fact that yes a new PT test is coming out, I never disagreed.
Good to see you understand that now. Watch how you phrase things, especially if you are assuming. For something you didn't know as fact, you sure were stubborn/argumentative in defense.
ambernewton04 said:I'm not the one that turned this into an argument.
Yes your last post, you said you worded things poorly. That was acknowledged as a good thing.ambernewton04 said:I retracted what I originally said. I incorrectly worded what I meant to say and I corrected that.
ambernewton04 said:FORCE is the testing that WILL eventually be taking place in BMQ, NOT IS ( which I've already apologized for the confusion). The only thing I wasn't sure of was the exact date. I WAS told it would happen either January or the new fiscal year. That information has not been confirmed, so can be assumed hearsay, and that's what I've said. I never said 100% that's when it will happen ( again, I incorrectly worded and corrected ).
ambernewton04 said:So I'm not too sure what your reasoning is to continue to reply to this. Seems like you re the one WHO's looking for an argument, which is silly.