Y
Yes Man
Guest
it posted 2x
Its not that they could not use the new buildings, its that they would have to build two. Two different showers cost more than one big one. Also about the uniforms I have said this a few times, it would not that big of a deal, its just a small factor.Originally posted by willy:
[qb] Yes Man: I don‘t think you‘ve said a single thing here that makes any sense. The CF couldn‘t use the new buildings they‘d have to build because they were originally built for women? Take a screwdriver, change the sign to read "Men", and I don‘t see the problem. There would be a backbreaking cost issue for uniforms? Quite simply, no there wouldn‘t be. There is already quite a size range in the CF as it stands.
[/qb]
It is a fact,on average women are better shots than men.Originally posted by Tyrnagog:
[qb] maybe not, but how does gender choose who is the better shot?
I mean, if this were WW1, I would say men, because the tech wasn‘t as good as it is now, and it did sometimes get down to hand to hand combat.
With todays tech, though, it rarely gets to that point (ideally). [/qb]
A woman would still have to succeed at basic training, even if she was drafted. It‘s not like you‘re going to have 5000 clueless cheerleader types, who freak out and can‘t handle shooting at someone running around screaming or something.Well I think you are pretty fixed on your position, but one last question. If you could only field 10,000 random soldiers and it would be those soldiers who determined the fate of not just your life but the life of everyone in the country, would you go for a 50/50 split or would you make them all men?