Citing the spinoffs of the investigation has approximately the same value as citing the popular vote does for Hillary's loss in the 2016 election. People who don't like that the Steele Dossier, the Alfa Bank server rumour, and the letter by 51 intelligence community luminaries (for example) were used to salt misleading claims don't care about some guy's false statement or financial fraud. They think the system is dirty, because dirty people on the outside of investigative and media agencies were able to get dirty and gullible people on the inside of the agencies to carry political water and throw up a bunch of political dust. As long as people think the system is dirty, every appearance of electoral impropriety is going to look like fraud to them. The blame for that distrust lies firmly with the people who exploited the system or allowed themselves to be exploited, and is unlikely to vanish until the guilty parties have received some sort of adequate comeuppance and people are no longer seen to be trying to shape election results by fighting processes which tend to safeguard election integrity.