- Reaction score
- 1,936
- Points
- 1,060
Do we not think Mark Carneys opening on whatever American talk show it is is a bit of an own goal as well?
Say what now?Do we not think Mark Carneys opening on whatever American talk show it is is a bit of an own goal as well?
Do we not think Mark Carneys opening on whatever American talk show it is is a bit of an own goal as well?
hes on john stewartSay what now?
clubbed him like a baby sealApparently he debated Poilievre in 2021.
Who clubbed who from your point of view?clubbed him like a baby seal
OH! Pierre clubbed Carney.Who clubbed who from your point of view?
Not really a debate. You don’t debate when called to committee, you answer questions.Apparently he debated Poilievre in 2021.
I think calling Klaus Schwabb a Nazi is a bit much. The mans' been awarded a prestigious prize by Israel in the past. What information made you come up with that label for him? If you are referring to his father - how is this different than Freeland and her Grandfather? Its been pointed out here that a child should not be held accountable for the sins of their father/grandfather. While I'm not overly 'happy' about Freeland's grandfather and his prior actions in WWII, I don't label her a Nazi or Nazi collaborator.So I do admit, he is a lot more charismatic & charming than I expected. I hadn't seen him in a casual interview setting before.
But Trudeau was quite charismatic & likeable too, and look how he's turned out...
Bottom line - Carney is a huge champion of the carbon tax, opposes pipelines being built, openly states in the interview with Jon Stewart that he's basically against the oil & gas industry, and is a huge proponent of The Fourth Industrial Revolution (a very anti-human agenda first published by no other than the world's most high profile Nazi, Klaus Shwabb)
He's a high ranking member of the WEF, is connected to Chrystia Freeland in some pretty close ways (Godfather to her kids I believe?) and is basically a WEF globalist hack who will continue the path that Trudeau & Freeland have sent us down.
......
Remember folks, within 48 hours of being appointed to lead an economic task force (in which he is the only person on the task force) he promptly arranged for a $2 billion dollar loan to his buddy who owns Telesat.
He also suggested the country pay him $10 billion to run our pension funds for us.
Did you see him with John Stewart last night?Not really a debate. You don’t debate when called to committee, you answer questions.
But I don’t think Carmey is going to be very good in any real debate.
I don’t disagree with the sentiment to some degree, but any state investment in private industry needs to be 100% transparently verified as not having any linkage whatsoever to adversarial influence. It can’t look like a good idea on the surface and have ties back through a chain of discrete paths to another state intent on controlling Canadian industrial expertise. I think there is reasonable enough grounds in the cases of *Nortel and RIM, that Canadians are justified in not being so quick to celebrate statements of intent to invest/increase influence of key industrial/technological elements of Canadian business.As for Telesat, its close to being the ONLY significantly large high tech firm that this country has left and I personally am not adverse to it receiving state sponsored support if it means that Canada has at least 1 remaining globally significant high tech company, especially in the field of space.
Did you see him with John Stewart last night?
I think he will do fine in a debate. A debate is very different than a formulaic Q Period tit for tat.
There is also the fact that he has held actual positions of responsibility and authority, and run very large institutions.....
I haven’t yet but plan to.Did you see him with John Stewart last night?
Agreed that it isn’t like QP. Remains to be seen though and open to the idea he could do ok. We’ll see in the leadership run what that could look like.
I think he will do fine in a debate. A debate is very different than a formulaic Q Period tit for tat.
I don’t question his credentials. I think he’s quite capable and to be honest might be the only real shot (albeit long) among the LPC contenders in a general election.There is also the fact that he has held actual positions of responsibility and authority, and run very large institutions.....
We’ll start seeing that in the leadership run. But unless he does a massive re-set on a lot of policy planks it will be a bigger hurdle to convince Canadians that he is the guy.There is one thing - he's a more capable human than any of the other Liberal front runners. Now onto what really matters, his policies...
There is one thing - he's a more capable human than any of the other Liberal front runners. Now onto what really matters, hispoliciesFrench ...
There, FTFY
Liberal officials say it’s ‘essential’ their next party leader is bilingual - National | Globalnews.ca
Current and former Liberal party officials, both French and English speakers, say the next Liberal leader replacing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should be bilingual.globalnews.ca