The idea that the Militia fought WW2 - or any war for that matter - is an incorrect one. The vat majority of soldiers sent overseas joined for the war. The Militia regiments, broken down, half-empty and bankrupt as they were, were filled up by recruits.
Same goes for WW1. **** , in Korea they didn‘t even bother asking the Militia or the Regs.
The Reg-Res hostility is a major problem in the Army (a problem that is missing for the most part in the Navy and Air Force).
The problem, as I see, is the civilianization of DND and the upper ranks of the CF. Trudeau combined the CF and DND, and added civilian positions and such things to the top ranks. Now, the entire upper echelon is politicized and is filled with polictial appointees - generals promoted by politicians and civvie bureucrats put there by politicians.
The fact we‘ve been ignored for 50 years by Ottawa doesn‘t help much.
The CF is not made to fight. It is simply the sum total of a range of competing polictial interests, including, but not limited too: militia political pull, liberal PR, public opinion, industry, and our allies. The various strengths and weaknesses of the CF are a result of this.
Through a process called "satisficing", in which the lowest common denomiator solution satisfactory to each group is used to create and agreed upon low standard, the CF has been created and managed.
This is not all that different than other nations...except in most nations little things like "national security", "defence", "force projection" and such things come into play.
However, I have no doubt that our Soft Power and human security agenda has just as much impact as a carrier battle group....