Women are not built to fight as well as men
explain. I would argue that the women currently fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq (on both sides) seem to be built well enough to fight. After all, they're doing it. (no argument, there still built different)
You stated that women are not "built to fight as well as men". I asked you to show me how. You still haven't done so, and now have attempted to 'downgrade' your arguement to "there still built different". Well, they're certainly built differently, thank heaven, but you originally said they are not "built to fight as well as men". Prove it.
We are a different beast then women built and designed different for different jobs or are you one of those creationists?
my opinions on the creation of life, and how it got to this point, have no relevance to the topic.
I have no argument that the current women in I or A are not doing well, read my post I said the Russian women units had great success.
so how, then, are they not doing as well as men? After all, that is the crux of your argument, is it not?
(I'm talking about the decision to trigger inside the brain not the actual trained decision to pull trigger, subtle difference but enough to keep you alive)
what on earth are you babbling about? "the decision to trigger inside the brain not the actual trained decision"? What is that supposed to mean? There is no "decision to trigger inside the brain" in a properly trained individual! Nor is there an "actual trained decision to pull trigger"! There is a threat and the trigger is manipulated.
as proven conclusively in the American and British militarise right now in Iraq, and the various LEO agencies across North America (that proves nothing).
so, lemme get this straight: the
fighting women in two Theatres of War, and the women who are
fighting on the streets of our continent, prove nothing about the abilities of women to
fight? Sure, makes sense. If I beat myself over the head repeatedly with a blunt object, anyway.
I would argue that having a woman present to posture for, would cause a young alpha-male fight harder.(well you would be wrong)
how so, Oh Dispenser of Wisdom? You state that young men will posture more for each other than for a woman? When science (and innumerable bar fights) says the exact opposite?
The only solution if you want women in combat IMHO is to form all female units, they will fight and will do well. this has proven to be a disaster (by what country, Russians were very successful).
were they now? But, I thought you say that women are not built for fighting?
That's why the Israelis folded theirs. (Thats not why they folded theres)
So, then, why did they fold them? The reports I read, released by the Israeli army, state other-wise, but edify and enlighten me.
Numerous studies conducted in the '80s and '90s have shown that the best mix of male to female front-line soldiers is 70% to 30% (in canada I was part of the study the study does not prove your point it is out of context).
How is it out of context? Were we not discussing the effectiveness of women in battle? Were we not debating the effectiveness of all-female units?
And this study you were a part of, was it before or after your Deep-Combat Experience where you were the envy and awe of SpecOps? And was it despite, or because of, your suffering from Depleted Uranium Poisoning, PTSD, and Agent Orange Poisoning?
If you read the whole argument I think women can fight and very well just not as well as men pound for pound on equal comparison yes yes there are always exceptions to the rule we are not talking about the 5% that are built capable and have the drive we are talking about the entire group. The issue is not enough of the equal ones to fill an army thats the problem and the point.
you have no point. You have argued for and against both sides of this issue, and neither very well. Stop back-pedalling. Make a point and stick with it. Then, try to debate that point in a common-sense manner. Or else, go put your big red nose and floppy shoes back on.
And for the love of all that is sacred and profane, man: use proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation. You write like a junior high school kid. The occasional typo is to be expected, but you have claimed to be an Officer of The Crown (and a very Rambo-ish one, at that, the epitome of professionalism). At least attempt to get your points across like someone with a degree. If I can do it, with my Alberta Grade 12, I'm certain that you can, as well.