New "HLVW" type Mercedes Truck in Gagetown?
- Thread starter honestyrules
- Start date
Bomber said:
What are you basing your conclusion on?
I'm interested in your opinion because I am the trial officer for a potential gun tractor (and limber) replacement, what you've hit on is only a fragment of what has to be measured, but I am just wondering aloud, what makes you think it is an "awesome truck"?
- Reaction score
- 8,198
- Points
- 1,160
I don't want to divert this discussion but your "limber" reference intrigued me. Are limbers still in use or is it a case of an old idea being new again? The last gun that I was aware of with a limber was the old 25 pdr.
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
I remember the old L5 pack howitzer that 5 RALC used to carry in the box of the 2 1/2
Having seen 10 ton PLS in use within the CF and commercial variants in all sizes, I always wondered why "the guns" never opted to have a tilt bed ammo and stores unit for a 2 1/2, 3 or 5 ton gun tractor.
Having seen 10 ton PLS in use within the CF and commercial variants in all sizes, I always wondered why "the guns" never opted to have a tilt bed ammo and stores unit for a 2 1/2, 3 or 5 ton gun tractor.
geo said:
Oddly enough Geo, that's exactly what we trialed last Sept., an HLVW PLS carrying 3 small sea containers modified to be used as a SEV for a gun tractor.
BTW I use the term "limber" very loosely, it could mean another vehicle carrying primarily ammo, or in the traditional sense, i.e. a kind of small trailer hauling an extra load.
But the whole SOR for the gun tractor is a complicated issue, and remains to be resolved, this is happening soon.
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
Heh....
Yeah - you shoulda seen how complicated it waas with the L5 in the back of the 2 1/2.
They had this big "A" frame on the front bumper, feeding a winch cable thru the cab thru the box to the gun's towing ring. There were rails / tracks that they would store on the vehicles side. Going into action, they would have to lay down the ramps and run down the gun to bring it into action ...... almost like a "keystone cop" commic strip... BUT things got real interesting if the tow ring got caught on the tailgate/ truck bed as it was winched back inside. the operator was in front of the vehicle and unable to see what was going on out back.... saw one instance where cable was pulled tighter and tighter till it snapped, broke all the bows and carved a neat grove in the cab roof & hood - also scaring the bejesus out of the winch operator.
Ah yes - there's no life like it.
Yeah - you shoulda seen how complicated it waas with the L5 in the back of the 2 1/2.
They had this big "A" frame on the front bumper, feeding a winch cable thru the cab thru the box to the gun's towing ring. There were rails / tracks that they would store on the vehicles side. Going into action, they would have to lay down the ramps and run down the gun to bring it into action ...... almost like a "keystone cop" commic strip... BUT things got real interesting if the tow ring got caught on the tailgate/ truck bed as it was winched back inside. the operator was in front of the vehicle and unable to see what was going on out back.... saw one instance where cable was pulled tighter and tighter till it snapped, broke all the bows and carved a neat grove in the cab roof & hood - also scaring the bejesus out of the winch operator.
Ah yes - there's no life like it.
George Wallace
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 97
- Points
- 560
ringo said:
Although the Grizzley was used to tow the C1/2/3, it had two rear doors, not a ramp. The Ramp on the LAV III would negate towing any arty piece. Add on the spare tire and there is no way that the crew could mount or exit the LAV.
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
WRT using the LAV or any other kind of MOWAG based vehicle would be the problem with ammunition and stores. the Inside box of this class of vehicle is just too darned tight to fit staff & stores at any one time - which means that a "gun" would require LAV AND TRUCK.
geo said:
Which is the Status Quot with the M777 at the moment, ie a LAV II (Bison) and an up-armoured HLVW.
2 vehicles has been the norm for Artillery units deployed on Ops (the exception being in Kabul) for about 10 years now, yet our doctrine hasn't actually supported this, it has only 1 vehicle doing the job, and so the second vehicle has had to be "borrowed" from other units. This doctrine is in the middle of being changed right now.
But this will lead to a problem of what to give the low readiness (and Reserve) units if a 2 vehicle combination like that is what is acceptable (needed), and right now all they have is one vehicle; the problem being can we afford that and, if not, is there a compromise if force generation is to equal force employment. It's not likely this new truck, by itself, will be meet the requirement of FG=FE.
There's a lot more to all this, but in the Arty world that's the crux of it, and we'll have to wait and see what the new year brings.
Cripes, Master Gunner, we've gone back a hundred years. At the end of the nineteenth century a gun detachment - called a sub-section at the time - consisted of a gun and limber towed by a six horse team and a wagon and limber towed by another six horse team. The wagon et al waited a distance behind the guns to come forward to resupply ammunition, hence the term 'wagon lines' instead of A1 echelon that used to be used in the artillery.
lol
it's not that bad sir
That's just the issue with the towed gun part of our capability, a right now problem that deals with what I thought the topic was about, namely new trucks we've seen around.
There are other future capabilities being kicked around, but the Army hasn't quite made up its mind yet with what they should be (HIMARS, unmanned munitions, NLOS-C et al), I just didn't want to hijack the thread too much with Arty stuff. But I guess I just did. ;D
it's not that bad sir
That's just the issue with the towed gun part of our capability, a right now problem that deals with what I thought the topic was about, namely new trucks we've seen around.
There are other future capabilities being kicked around, but the Army hasn't quite made up its mind yet with what they should be (HIMARS, unmanned munitions, NLOS-C et al), I just didn't want to hijack the thread too much with Arty stuff. But I guess I just did. ;D
Similar threads
