Ahh, it’s nice to shoot the sh!t with fellow “guns ‘n’ bombersâ€!
Acadia University did have a respected military history program until the unfortunate death of James Stokesbury. “Stokes†was killed in a car accident in the summer of 1994, and after his death things were never the same. William “Bill†Carter was brought in for the 1995 academic year, and Michael Ramsay for 1996. After Ramsay returned to Queens/RMC to finish his PhD, the program never recovered.
(Just as an aside, I highly recommend Stokesbury‘s "A Short History of ..." series of books. From the American Revolution to the Korean War, these are probably some of the best survey texts available on the major wars of the past two hundred years.)
Mike Ramsay was one of my Honours advisors in 1996, and he was great. He’s teaching at Kansas State now and just published his PhD in March. It’s called “Command and Cohesion: The Citizen Soldier and Minor Tactics in the British Army, 1870-1918†(hardcover @
www.amazon.ca for $76). A friend of mine who read a pre-release version thought it was great.
I believe Terry Copp is semi-retired now, so I’m not sure what state the military history MA at Laurier is in. My wife was working on her PhD at Waterloo in the late 90s, and she thought it was starting to wind down. A friend of mine was one of Terry’s last students, and he really enjoyed working with him. He actually went on to York to do a semi-military history PhD, but ran afoul of office politics and the realization that maybe he didn’t actually want to be a professor, and he washed out during his comps.
I’ve always thought that Marc Milner is an excellent historian, as are all those on staff at Calgary. I was all set to do my MA at Calgary under John Ferris, but they wouldn’t guarantee me any funding, so I ended up at Waterloo, where I studied early 20th century British foreign policy (specifically Lord Lansdowne’s term as foreign secretary). If Stokesbury hadn‘t died, I probably would‘ve stuck with pure military history, instead of moving into the only slightly more politically correct field of international relations.
The problem with studying military history is that the job market is so small. If you don’t move into museums, film-making, or “strategic studies†the prospects of using your degree are pretty small -- and the DND Directorate of History is such a small group you really have to be well-connected to get even your toe in the door.
I don’t even think the CF places much emphasis on traditional military history anymore, unlike West Point or Sandhurst. Another friend of mine completed his War Studies MA at RMC a few years back, and he had nothing but complaints for the history department. The clique in charge had re-focused on international relations at the expense of military history and strategy, and it (the department, that is) was not a exactly a nice place to work.
That’s really too bad, because the RMC library is absolutely fabulous.