• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Latest Threat to CF in Combat: Smoke Breaks?!?

Hey Vern,

There was a time when our Messes were the hub of society and social life (full of smoke and stale beer which soaked into the carpets), now they are all but dead. I have been to the 6RAR Long Tan SGT's Mess once, and they have torn down our beloved ANZAC SGTs Mess.

At Mess Dinners, there are now options of water, orange juice or port for the 'kangaroo court'. My how times have changed.

Cheers,

Wes
 
Wesley  Down Under said:
Hey Vern,

There was a time when our Messes were the hub of society and social life (full of smoke and stale beer which soaked into the carpets), now they are all but dead. I have been to the 6RAR Long Tan SGT's Mess once, and they have torn down our beloved ANZAC SGTs Mess.

At Mess Dinners, there are now options of water, orange juice or port for the 'kangaroo court'. My how times have changed.

Cheers,

Wes

Wes, I'm talking about the Mess Hall where the living in troops eat their meals each day. Wow, some of the stuff served in them. Let's get rid of the red meats, the ice cream, the many fatty deserts, the poutine, the french fry option at every meal ... etc etc and go with fish and salads only.

After all, it all comes down to promoting the health of the soldier, or so they'd say. I'm good with that, if it's done for one and all, not just the target group of the month decade ...again.

Funny thing about all that is I love my rare steak, my chocolate ice cream dripping in hot fudge sauce, and a side of poutine. It's got nothing to do with the fact that I'm a smoker; it's got to do with the myth that someone HAS to look after me and my smoking for the benfit of my health ...  but doesn't feel the need to HAVE to provide that duty of care to myself for my bad eating habits, or to a non-smoker for their bad eating habits or Timmies addiction habits; all of which are affecting our health.
 
ArmyVern said:
And non-drinkers get hit by drunk drivers. Drunk driving also happens to be illegal, there are a whole lot of families out there in Canada that would argue that someone having a drink does indeed have the ability to effect someone who doesn't.
Well, obviously. I'm not talking about things that are already illegal as there's nothing to discuss. It does raise the point that someone smoking in a car is at least partially distracted and cannot maintain both hands on the wheel. Does that make a more dangerous driver? Certainly not as bad as a drunk one, but I'd still say yes.

ArmyVern said:
Smoking affects my task-worthiness? I'm NOT smoking while I'm working (we are not allowed to!!); I'm smoking while the nonsmokers are sitting in the canteen drinking coffee. 
I'm not going to refer to you in person here, but in general, yes. The health damage is clear and known for decades. It WILL affect a soldiers effectiveness by simply reducing their fitness.

ArmyVern said:
Smoking affects my task-worthiness? I'm NOT smoking while I'm working (we are not allowed to!!); I'm smoking while the nonsmokers are sitting in the canteen drinking coffee.  Enemy party in the field?? NVGs?? Yes absolutely. And as was already discussed, the NVGs are just the latest on this ... read the prior posts on the sniper-checks while lighting smokes from many many years ago. This is not new. If that tell-tale glow showed up to the naked eye at night, the logical assumption is that it would therefore show up really good to eyes being aided by NVGs.
You don't have to be able to see it with the unaided eye for nvgs to show it. That's the issue. As soon as darkness falls it is impossible to know. The old trick of hiding the lit ciggie in a 50cal expended cartridge doesn't work anymore. It still shows up and you will never know, nor will your buddies who can't see it, but the enemy OP will be well aware...

FWIW, I'm not out to ban it in total, just keep it away from work, and discourage it in general. As much as I would not want someone drinking on duty (or showing the effects of previous drinking), I wouldn't want them smoking either.
 
Benny said:
Well, obviously. I'm not talking about things that are already illegal as there's nothing to discuss. It does raise the point that someone smoking in a car is at least partially distracted and cannot maintain both hands on the wheel. Does that make a more dangerous driver? Certainly not as bad as a drunk one, but I'd still say yes.
I'm not going to refer to you in person here, but in general, yes. The health damage is clear and known for decades. It WILL affect a soldiers effectiveness by simply reducing their fitness.
You don't have to be able to see it with the unaided eye for nvgs to show it. That's the issue. As soon as darkness falls it is impossible to know. The old trick of hiding the lit ciggie in a 50cal expended cartridge doesn't work anymore. It still shows up and you will never know, nor will your buddies who can't see it, but the enemy OP will be well aware...

FWIW, I'm not out to ban it in total, just keep it away from work, and discourage it in general. As much as I would not want someone drinking on duty (or showing the effects of previous drinking), I wouldn't want them smoking either.

Good lord, where to begin??

1) The jump made between illegal drunk driving is akin to the argument in this thread that suggested that smokers addiction to that legal substance led to addictions to illegal substances. Now, alcohol can be an addiction, therefore the leap to someone who consumes alcohol legally ... being susceptible to committing that next phase in the process which is drunk-driving.  Give it up. Most of us are smart enough to obey the law. A smoker is no more susceptible to move up to using illegal drugs than a drinker is to committing drunk driving. That's the comparison there.

2) Yes!! Two hands on the wheel at all times. Let's ban all those issued blackberries and cell phones while we're at it!! Just so we can ensure they never have a hand off the wheel.  ::)  Geez, better yet, let's just be smart about it and practise that defensive driving that the CF teaches us OK?? Oh, and BTW, last time I checked, one couldn't be driving a military vehicle while on duty and smoking at the same time ... that would be illegal wouldn't it?

3) The health damage is clear and known for decades. When the heck did I ever say it wasn't?? But hell, so is cholesterol (which, I believe, is under no threat of ban for use by CF members ~Timmies would lose a friggin' fortune wouldn't they?) Red meat is available in a Mess Hall near you right now and it's known to be bad for you. As is sugar. As are calories. All available for soldiers consumption during duty hours. Do you get the point yet??

4) It will affect a soldiers effectiveness by simply reducing their fitness?? Is that your reasoning for the ban? Because if that's all you've got and you think that justifies it, I got a little tidbit of info for you here ... I am in shape. Much better shape than a heck of a lot of nonsmokers I know. So, I'm going to cut them off the Timmies and the cholesterol (because that must be the cause of it). But now I can't really be too sure about exactly what the cause of it is ... because they aren't overweight. Don't worry, I guarantee you'll never have to hump my ruck or parts of my kit for me, but this evil smoker has done just that for some others ... including a couple male nonsmokers. Want to talk cardio?? Ante up your end-time for a 5km swim (no breaks ... no touching the walls or the pool bottom) and we'll see who comes out on top. The assumptions you make about someones fitness level amaze me. 

5) Good gawd, the night vision thing again?? Have you actually read the posts?? Smokers know when to smoke and when not to, just because we smoke doesn't mean that we're going to risk your life to the enemy. Get a grip, we are more professional than that and, as I said before, it's a tired old argument. We decided many posts ago that this has been widely known by us CF members for years now and is really nothing new.

6) OK just keep it away from work ... that's a switch up, but guess what?? It still doesn't address the underlying issue of the Mess Halls serving up proven-to-be-unhealthy-items 3 times a day to the troops living in. It's the same damn thing. And, I hope you're not a Timmies S/S, D/D, or T/T (or whatever combo preferred) drinker either because by default, they should also be kept away from the workplace and discouraged.
 
Smoking = bad, check
drinking = bad, check
drugs = bad, check
cursing = bad, check
fast food = bad, check
coffee = bad, check
over/under sleeping or eating, hyperactive, underproductive = all bad, check
porn = bad, check
masterbation = bad, check (do we really want blind troops now??)
"insert missing vices here" = bad, check!
I think I got the vices down pat. ALL BAD. Got it.
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but, as long as I'm in shape, keep my vices to the confines of the law and designated times and places deemed acceptable by "society".....well am I not signing up to be shot at and (god forrbid) killed by some bullet?? Have most of you not signed up under the exact same pretense?

Slightly redundant, in my minds eye, that you are not supposed to do or have these things, but you are to lay your life on the line. I don't remember anywhere in the phamplet along the lines of "we live by the bullet and die by the bullet, nothing else".
Pretty sure most people would turn around if that were the case.


 
ArmyVern said:
2) Yes!! Two hands on the wheel at all times. Let's ban all those issued blackberries and cell phones while we're at it!! Just so we can ensure they never have a hand off the wheel.  ::)  Geez, better yet, let's just be smart about it and practise that defensive driving that the CF teaches us OK?? Oh, and BTW, last time I checked, one couldn't be driving a military vehicle while on duty and smoking at the same time ... that would be illegal wouldn't it?

You must of missed the class on driving the ML with out spilling your coffee  ;D
 
Back
Top