This is like the dumbass stunt like destroying Nikes or Bud Lights because they don’t agree with their stance on something.
Why is this sensible?
That would be an excellent and reasonable policy.
Well now you've totally jinxed it.
I will agree with that.
Some foods are taxed. It depends on how advanced the conversion of ingredients from raw to table-ready is. Some other things that are absolute necessities to the people who use them are subject to GST, too. "Necessity" isn't a universally respected criterion, so it shouldn't be used to justify GST exemption. If we're going to be compassionate, we first ought to agree not to leave anyone out.
More precisely, it’s certain ‘basic grocery’ (non-junk) items, but the conversation didn’t call for a great deal of precision. For those interested in knowing more, and exact guide us here.
I agree with you - perfection isn't an excuse to take no steps at all - but I'd prefer to see a movement rather than a single stride. I've almost stopped supporting other people's good ideas because once they get what they want they seem to always range from indifferent to hostile to my interests.
Big picture, there's not enough people buying it to destroy to counteract the number of regular consumers longer buying it at all. Bud Light lost a billion dollars from the boycott.
Or maybe people just realized it was shit beer …Big picture, there's not enough people buying it to destroy to counteract the number of regular consumers longer buying it at all. Bud Light lost a billion dollars from the boycott.
Bud Light boycott likely cost Anheuser-Busch InBev over US$1 billion in lost sales
The world’s largest brewer may have lost as much as US$1.4 billion in sales because of the backlash to its brief partnership with a transgender influencer to promote Bud Light beer.www.ctvnews.ca
It and full strength Bud were my camping beer, because they taste the same warm or cold... terrible.
Unsurprising.
I've been boycotting it for years, because it's sex in a canoe.
Because the activist pushing this do not want equality. I know two gay couples M/M & F/F. Both couples reflect a quiet majority of gays not busy protesting. What most of the quiet majority wanted was to marry the person of their choice, share benefits and not get the crap beaten out of them regularly. They have achieved this goal and are content and there are few people who have a major problem with those 3 goals. The activists however must ensure the "Revolution continues" Without the constant push, they lose their purpose and possibly their paycheque.
