If Hamas, Hezbollah, or any group or person exploded electronic devices in Israel and killed children, it would be described by the entire Western media class as a horrific act of wanton evil sadistic terrorism. Israel does it and it's seen as an epic based move to be celebrated. There is no way that what Israel just pulled in Lebanon is not a war crime. It is 100% a war crime. It is an act of terror and attempting to justify it by saying the target was Hezbollah when they killed children, medics, doctors, civilians is not going to work. Horrific.
...
That’s by no means a sure thing, and not even necessarily likely. We here are not equipped with the information to assess that.
What jumps at me is that this was clearly intelligence driven. Pagers are antiquated technology, it’s an anomaly that they were being used at all. If reports that Hezbollah has ordered it’s people to reduce tech are true, and if Israel had actionable intelligence of a pager procurement by and for Hezbollah, it’s absolutely plausible that a claim could be made that this was targeted with sufficient precision at Hezbollah personnel, that those carrying these pagers were largely valid military targets, and that the identification of these pagers as specifically a Hezbollah C2 tool made the strike precise enough.
Zero civilian casualties is an aspirational goal but it’s not a legal standard. Necessity, proportionality, discrimination.
It’s likely that a lot of working professionals in Lebanon are ‘dual hatted’, filling both a civilian role and working for Hezbollah on the side in direct military, or political or logistical roles.
While it’s right to be critical about and to question the precision and discrimination of this means of attack, that critical eye also needs to be in good faith. Israel may have successfully stricken a wide array of, in some cases, reasonably senior Hezbollah leaders, and a bunch of (validly targeted) lower ranked members/enablers. Some civilian collateral casualties, while awful, can be generally expected and justified if they weren’t disproportionate.
I don’t have the answers to call this one conclusively, but you don’t either.