- Reaction score
- 10,327
- Points
- 1,260
dapaterson said:But no valid fitness test in the year will mean your file will not be seen by the merit boards.
Duckman54 said:No, Obedientwhateverguy...
That's fair you're entitled to your opinion and being a Kinesiologist with 15 years experience you must know a lot about this stuff.Just that all the back-n-forth, especially earlier in the thread, about the specifics of what will/should be tested, and how to train for it, came across to me as trivial.
Okay but what about stacking oranges compared to blocks? The temperature you're going to store them. What types of oranges.Kinda reminded me of an old Sesame Street skit... "Gee Burt, I don't know how to count blocks, I only know how to count oranges!"
Ya know? Getting hung up on details, not really seeing the end goal.
So you're saying if a recruit or someone goes for a light 2.4km jog a few times a week then they will have no problems completing a timed force march wearing helmet, rifle vest and rucksack with weight in it? How many 13KM marchs with rucks have you done out of curiosity? In my experience you get better at rucksack marches by marching with rucksacks. Just 'doing something' helps but it doesn't train someone to succeed and I've seen people fail tests (physical, practical, knowledge) because of just that.Same with running. Just go. Don't worry if next year's test is 2.4 km, or 10 km, or a 13 km march with a ruck... just do some kinda aerobic exercise regularly, and stamina WILL improve.
Maybe I took the context of your post wrong, if so I apologize. It just sounded like someone with no military experience was calling the input and concerns of experienced serving and retired members silly.THAT was my point that was apparently missed. NEVER meant to belittle consequences of pass/fail on one's career.
Tank Troll said:Does any one know if this new test to be done in FFO or PT strip?
Haggis said:Once the research began and the results started to show the linkage to the common tasks, the RCAF bought into the FORCE test as being applicable to them. I have heard that the RCAF have decided to retain the services of PSP for the FORCE test.
I was at the gym the other day and listened to the PSP staff explain the upcoming tests with some folks.gelan said:Anyone have details on this new test? I've heard some folks are being tested with it now.
Adding PPE & load carriage would raise the threshold of the test, so it would not be possible to do the test in FFO and claim it to be the same thing. But, from Army Combats to NCDs, everyone does have some for of operational clothing. As the new test reflects tasks that would have to be done in operational clothing, it would seem appropriate to do the test in that clothing.AmmoTech90 said:Considering it is a CF test and not everyone has combats, let alone FFO, I would say PT strip.
MCG said:If we are smart, the option will be left open for the chain of command to decide between operational clothing or PT clothing because that will not be the difference on a pass or fail.
jollyjacktar said:For me it's the 20 meter rush test. I'm damned if I can visualize my completing that GD test in the allotted time. For the older beasts out there like me, how did they seem to fair with the up and down nonsense?
perhaps the new test is not a sign that "they" are setting conditions for mass failure. Suggesting something nefarious is silly. Instead, perhaps the "sticker shock" at this new test is a sign that the old test itself was too easy and as a result unable to identify many pers who lacked the physical ability to perform the common tasks.jollyjacktar said:How did you find that test in practice? I know I need some tinfoil but it seems to me with these new tests that they're setting up many people for a mass cull when they don't make the timings and get multiple fails.
And that is why I said I needed some tinfoil. Because those who need tinfoil are clearly not to be taken seriously as life is usually not a conspiracy. I think :Tin-Foil-Hat:MCG said:perhaps the new test is not a sign that "they" are setting conditions for mass failure. Suggesting something nefarious is silly. Instead, perhaps the "sticker shock" at this new test is a sign that the old test itself was too easy and as a result unable to identify many pers who lacked the physical ability to perform the common tasks.
jollyjacktar said:How did you find that test in practice?