- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 530
My point is, and has been before, is people are already giving all of that up, for free and voluntarily, to companies. The same companies who, 95% of the time, have a stipulation in the EULA that they are free to do whatever they want with the data you give them. Including selling it for profit. And just because a company is a good corporate citizen and doesn't do that, if they sell out to another company, that data now belongs to the company who bought them out and whatever their EULA is.MilEME09 said:Back in the days before technology, something about the old ways just have their appeal still. Tracking apps are going to bring up huge privacy concerns, how is the data stored, and for how long? what data is being given? name? address? every place you go? how long you are there, if other people have the app, now you could be tracking communities, social networks, etc..... I would not be surprised if problems came up from the privacy commissioner or the courts.
Facebook isn't valued at $500 billion simply because it pops ads for cat litter up beside the kitty picture you clicked like on...
Tinder isn't valued at $1 billion because of all the people paying for their premium subscription...
Alphabet (parent of Google) isn't valued at $1 TRILLION because they give good search results and free email...
President's Choice doesn't give you free groceries simply because you're a loyal customer and get good discounts with their app...
Shaw isn't being nice by having all those free hot-spots all around Canada where you can get free WiFi...
Your cellphone company has the data of every where you go, how long you spend there, who you call/text in each location, can aggregate everyone else who was at the same location at the same time who are also customers...
Ancestry doesn't offer cheap DNA tests out of the goodness of their hearts...
For people to be suddenly screaming, "Oh no! The government want's to track me with a COVID app!!" is ignoring the reality of what they have already voluntarily agreed to just because it is convenient.
Again, not saying the CAF, or any level of government, should be able to compel anyone to install any kind of software, just saying people need to take a hard look at what they are already doing before they start expressing outrage about the PM musing about recommending that people install something voluntarily.