• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2025 Federal Election - 28 Apr 25

Folks, we've got 2 threads going talking about the same subjects. I'm locking this up until there's a writ dropped and we can lock the other one. Please just quote post and drag any pending replies over to the Liberal Minority Government Thread: Liberal Minority Government 2021 - ????

- Milnet.ca Staff
 
Pulling this from other thread so I can live update: Carney’s speaking outside of Rideau Hall now. He’s pledged a 1% reduction in the lowest federal tax bracket. He’s speaking about affordability, and very specifically said that his generation came up with the bargain that if you put the work in, you get to afford a home and send your kids to school; the generations who’ve come up behind now don’t have that confidence. That’s gonna be powerful with younger voters.

Questions now, I’ll try to update:

Toronto Star. Why now, why not govern longer so Canadians can see what he’s got?
- Done a lot in nine days, protecting workers, retaliatory tariff revenue to protect workers. Poilievre would just use it for a tax cut (the shots start). Canadians want a single Canadian economy, we’ve brought premiers together and have a consensus. Federal commitment to remove these barriers by Canada Day. Highlights again a lot in nine days. But it’s important government has a mandate from Canadians to diversify trade and partners, and to stand up to Trump.

You linked Musk and Trump to Conservatives. Poilievre has said today he’ll stand up for Canadians. How can you compare Can to US Conservwtives?

- Easy, first language mirrors. Second, intentions match. U.S. says eliminate foreign aid, then Poilievre goes to Nunavut, ignores local leaders and says the same. Proposals are ‘uncannily familiar’ to Trump admin. Different from our approach to build housing market; today we announced expanded dental care for more Canadians; Poilievre pretends they don’t exist while we expanded it by 4.5m Canadians.

Question from Ashley Burke. I missed it because the other thread locked while I edited. Carney talking about new trade corridors, clean and conventional energy, building new homes, in nine days government has put many foundations in place and is asking for a mandate to continue.

- Mostly repeating same in French. It’s not superb French but it’s passable.

You’re new but 10 years of liberals. Why should Canadians believe you’re change?

- You’ve seen changes in both words and action. Tax regime, more to come on housing in the next week, change to external trade and security partnerships, changes to healthcare coverage. Change to scale of ambition in creating one Canadian economy. I recognize the need to act dramatically and rapidly to build strong economy, control what we can control, and build for us. We have very strong members of caucus and ministers, recruiting exceptionally strong candidates, this is a renewed government. Proof is in the action.

Chris Nardi NatPoat: What’s your response to Danielle Smith and can you work with her?

- We’ll work with all stakeholders. Provinces, indigenous, unions, workers. Unanimous consensus at First Ministers’ meeting. I take note of her alignment of Poilievre with Trump, that’s a decision Canadians need to make- unified and standing up or division and Americanism, seems that’s what Poilievre is offering endorsed by premiers of Alberta. Now repeating in French and struggled a bit to start but got his groove. Jokes about about it’s hard to jump into French.

Will you be lowering, maintaining or increasing immigration?

- Post Covid there was a surge in immigration; TFW and students plus permanent. We have not lived up to the bargain with them; inadequate housing, not everyone who came for education is getting one. As a consequence, new caps are much lower levels. Those caps need to remain in place until we’ve expanded housing, transformed the levels of immigration that have happened. No predetermined point for cap changes. Carries on in French; WRT Quebec, issue is integrating immigrants and making them part of Wuebec society. Need for a pce that can let that happen.

You’re a Catholic, went to Church this morning. Do you explicitly support a woman’s right to choose? (He interrupt “absolutely”)

- Absolutely, unreservedly support right to choose and will proudly and consistently defend it. Will defend the Charter. I don’t speak about my personal faith or spirituality, but what’s relevant is it informs my sense of responsibility and service; I should serve my country as best I can. I felt at the turn of the year as crisis bore down on us that I should put my hand up and be part of that change. Much more needs to be done and that’s why I’m standing in front of you.

Why Nepean, what was involved in your decision, and what about Chandra Arya? What’s the situation involving him being disqualified? Don’t live in this riding?

- Decision of candidate approval is a party committee; basic candidate due diligence. I’m not a member of that committee. He was disqualified from leadership race due to certain factors, that informed recommendation he be disqualified of candidate. I’ve been a resident of Ottawa for 20 years other than when in London. Grew up in Nepean, know area well. It’s representative of many of the aspects of this country; median income little less than Nat avg, very diverse, opportunities and challenges we face as a country represented there. Repeating in French.

Final question in French from Le Devoir: You want to make Public Service more lean and mean; which programs would you like to cut?

- If there’s a program to accelerate housing, each government dollar should bring a dollar from private sector. It’s not a question of cutting.

You still haven’t spoken to Trump. Do you intend to meet him and do you feel you can stand up to him?

- Absolutely I can stand up to him, but he must recognize Canada is a sovereign country. He has to say and accept that before we can have a discussion about a trade agreement. There’s no planned meeting yet.

Done.
 
Last edited:
Pulling this from other thread so I can life update: Carney’s speaking outside of Rideau Hall now. He’s pledged a 1% reduction in the lowest federal tax bracket. He’s speaking about affordability, and very specifically said that his generation came up with the bargain that if you put the work in, you get to afford a home and send your kids to school; the generations who’ve come up behind now don’t have that confidence. That’s gonna be powerful with younger voters.

Questions now, I’ll try to update:

Toronto Star. Why now, why not govern longer so Canadians can see what he’s got?
- Done a lot in nine days, protecting workers, retaliatory tariff revenue to protect workers. Poilievre would just use it for a tax cut (the shots start). Canadians want a single Canadian economy, we’ve brought premiers together and have a consensus. Federal commitment to remove these barriers by Canada Day. Highlights again a lot in nine days. But it’s important government has a mandate from Canadians to diversify trade and partners, and to stand up to Trump.

You linked Musk and Trump to Conservatives. Poilievre has said today he’ll stand up for Canadians. How can you compare Can to US Conservwtives?

- Easy, first language mirrors. Second, intentions match. U.S. says eliminate foreign aid, then Poilievre goes to Nunavut, ignores local leaders and says the same. Proposals are ‘uncannily familiar’ to Trump admin. Different from our approach to build housing market; today we announced expanded dental care for more Canadians; Poilievre pretends they don’t exist while we expanded it by 4.5m Canadians.

Question from Ashley Burke. I missed it because the other thread locked while I edited. Carney talking about new trade corridors, clean and conventional energy, building new homes, in nine days government has put many foundations in place and is asking for a mandate to continue.

- Mostly repeating same in French. It’s not superb French but it’s passable.

You’re new but 10 years of liberals. Why should Canadians believe you’re change?

- You’ve seen changes in both words and action. Tax regime, more to come on housing in the next week, change to external trade and security partnerships, changes to healthcare coverage. Change to scale of ambition in creating one Canadian economy. I recognize the need to act dramatically and rapidly to build strong economy, control what we can control, and build for us. We have very strong members of caucus and ministers, recruiting exceptionally strong candidates, this is a renewed government. Proof is in the action.

Chris Nardi NatPoat: What’s your response to Danielle Smith and can you work with her?

- We’ll work with all stakeholders. Provinces, indigenous, unions, workers. Unanimous consensus at First Ministers’ meeting. I take note of her alignment of Poilievre with Trump, that’s a decision Canadians need to make- unified and standing up or division and Americanism, seems that’s what Poilievre is offering endorsed by premiers of Alberta. Now repeating in French and struggled a bit to start but got his groove. Jokes about about it’s hard to jump into French.

Will you be lowering, maintaining or increasing immigration?

- Post Covid there was a surge in immigration; TFW and students plus permanent. We have not lived up to the bargain with them; inadequate housing, not everyone who came for education is getting one. As a consequence, new caps are much lower levels. Those caps need to remain in place until we’ve expanded housing, transformed the levels of immigration that have happened. No predetermined point for cap changes. Carries on in French; WRT Quebec, issue is integrating immigrants and making them part of Wuebec society. Need for a pce that can let that happen.

You’re a Catholic, went to Church this morning. Do you explicitly support a woman’s right to choose? (He interrupt “absolutely”)

- Absolutely, unreservedly support right to choose and will proudly and consistently defend it. Will defend the Charter. I don’t speak about my personal faith or spirituality, but what’s relevant is it informs my sense of responsibility and service; I should serve my country as best I can. I felt at the turn of the year as crisis bore down on us that I should put my hand up and be part of that change. Much more needs to be done and that’s why I’m standing in front of you.

Whipping the crowd into a CPA-like frenzy ;)

Sleepy Jimmy Fallon GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon
 
Snapshot of the days just before the election writ was dropped, as a "before" ....
Screenshot 2025-03-23 101749.jpg
Let the Running of the Snakes officially begin!
1742750909395.png
 
Their entire campaign is going to be Poilievre equals Trump despite Trump saying the opposite. Oh, and the statement that Trump feels a Liberal government would be better is not the endorsement people think it is. Trump feels it's better because it's going to be the weaker option. Narcissists don't like strong opponents, only weak ones they feel they can gain an advantage over.
 
And this is the point where I feel all of our politicians are going to start sounding the exact same...


We have a housing crisis. Each party is going to pledge to fix that crisis.

We have an immigration problem, which in turn is causing other problems. Each party is going to pledge to review the numbers, and drastically lower them to make it easier to fix the other issues.

We are in a "trade war against Trump" - and each party is going to vow to stand up to Trump, eliminate internal trade barriers, and put Canadians first.


Every politician will say they are pro choice, because no Canadian politician is going to campaign on eliminating a woman's right to choose what happens with her own body.

Every politician will pledge to 'work towards the 2%' on NATO spending.

Every politician will pledge to eliminate red tape & expand support for workers, especially at a time of "unprecedented crisis"

And every politician is going to pledge to build more homes, and offer both builders and buyers incentives to lower the cost of housing.



There may be variations of the above from each party leader, but be prepared to hear the same stuff over & over again for the next month or so until the election happens folks...
 
And this is the point where I feel all of our politicians are going to start sounding the exact same...
If I was running this is what I'd say:

I am going to do nothing except collect money and eat til I am tired and sleep til I am hungry.

It might work.
 
Wasn't expecting Poilievre to call getting a security clearance a "politically motivated process", a statement like that makes me think he will be like Trump and not have a good relationship with the Canadian intelligence apparatus, or possibly ignore it.
 
Wasn't expecting Poilievre to call getting a security clearance a "politically motivated process", a statement like that makes me think he will be like Trump and not have a good relationship with the Canadian intelligence apparatus, or possibly ignore it.
I expect a future PM to be fully cleared and reading and UNDERSTANDING what is going on, and act on that intelligence in an appropriate manner.
 
Wasn't expecting Poilievre to call getting a security clearance a "politically motivated process", a statement like that makes me think he will be like Trump and not have a good relationship with the Canadian intelligence apparatus, or possibly ignore it.
It’s certainly a choice. Probably one he’ll keep hearing about.
 
Agreed and his statement does not make me think he will be serious on national security
Even the Liberals or die crowd within my friends and family do not think this is an issue at all. Talking to some of them, they are most concerned with someone who can fix the economy (and by default housing, one young Liberal pointed out her theory to me) and go toe to toe with Trump.

I was at a Regenerative Grazing seminar yesterday with lots of university students present (many were enrolled in environmental management programs) and there was ZERO faith in Carney and the Liberals amongst this crowd. Like not one.
 
Back
Top