• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Wikileaks and Julian Assange Mega-thread

Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act.

Wikileaks: Pakistan rejects US fears on nuclear arms
1 December 2010 Last updated at 07:08 ET

LINK

Pakistan has dismissed fears expressed in US diplomatic cables, released by whistle-blower website Wikileaks, that its nuclear material could fall into the hands of terrorists.

High Commissioner to the UK Wajid Shamsul Hasan said the material had a "foolproof control and command system".

The cables warn Pakistan is rapidly building its nuclear stockpile despite the country's growing instability.

There is also scepticism about whether Pakistan could cut links to militants.

Separately, Interpol has issued a notice asking for information on the whereabouts of Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange.

'Sovereign nation'

Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Hasan said the fears expressed in the cables came "off and on" but added: "We have always been telling them straight forward that [the nuclear weapons] are in secure hands, they don't have to worry about it and we will protect them.

"They are the dearest assets that we have and we'll not allow anything to fall into any adventurer's hands."

In domestic political terms, some of the most damaging material may be about the Pakistan government's stance on the controversial CIA drone programme, targeting militants in the tribal belt.

In public, officials oppose the drone strikes which have killed hundreds - including an unknown number of innocent civilians.

In private, it's a different story, according to a cable from US ambassador Anne Patterson. It says Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani had no objections to a planned drone attack.

"I don't care if they do it, as long as they get the right people," he said. "We'll protest in the National Assembly (parliament) and then ignore it."

In one of the latest cables to be released by Wikileaks, senior UK Foreign Office official Mariot Leslie told US diplomats in September 2009 that Britain had "deep concerns about the safety and security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons".

In another cable seven months earlier, then-US ambassador Anne Patterson told Washington: "Our major concern is not having an Islamic militant steal an entire weapon but rather the chance someone working in the government of Pakistan facilities could gradually smuggle enough material out to eventually make a weapon."

Another cable concerning a US intelligence briefing in 2008 said: "Despite pending economic catastrophe, Pakistan is producing nuclear weapons at a faster rate than any other country in the world."

Mr Hasan said that since the government of President Asif Ali Zardari had come to power 27 months ago "we have had a very successful, foolproof control and command system looking after the nuclear arsenal".

Mr Hasan admitted the leaks were harmful.

"You are dealing with the relationship with states. You have built them over the years and all of a sudden something gets out - it's top secret, it's classified, it harms the relationship," he said.

Mr Hasan also said Pakistan would not accept any US help on nuclear security "because we are a sovereign nation".

Pakistan foreign office spokesman Abdul Basit told Agence France-Presse news agency the fears expressed in the leaks "were misplaced and doubtless fall in the realm of condescension". He said they reflected "historical biases against Pakistan".

In the leaked material Ms Patterson also said there was "no chance" of Pakistan "abandoning support for [militant] groups".

The Pakistan government, she added, saw militant groups "as an important part of its national security apparatus against India".
The cables question Mr Zardari's relationship with the military
The US also expressed concern about tensions between the powerful Pakistani army and Mr Zardari.

In material from March 2009, US cables noted that army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani might "however reluctantly" put pressure on President Zardari to step down, although he "distrusted [opposition leader] Nawaz [Sharif] even more".

The BBC's Aleem Maqbool in Islamabad says military officials here believe the Wikileaks disclosures are being used as a stick with which to bully Pakistan into giving up its nuclear programme.

But he says there are many observers who will see the concerns raised as valid, particularly considering the tens of thousands of people here whose work is connected to the nuclear programme.

'Red Notice'

The US has condemned the Wikileaks disclosures, published by the UK Guardian newspaper, as an attack on the world community.

On Wednesday, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who is in Kazakhstan for the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) summit, said she had raised the issue with the leaders she had met and none had expressed any concerns about continuing diplomatic work with the US.

The communications between the US state department and its embassies and consulates around the world were sent between 1966 and 2010.

Wikileaks has so far posted only 291 of the 251,287 messages it says it has obtained. However, all of the messages have been made available to five publications, including the New York Times and the Guardian.

No-one has been charged with passing them to Wikileaks, but suspicion has fallen on US Army Private Bradley Manning, an intelligence analyst arrested in Iraq in June and charged over an earlier leak of a classified video.

The cables release is the third mass Wikileaks publication of classified documents; it published 77,000 secret US files on the Afghan conflict in July, and 400,000 documents about the Iraq war in October.

Meanwhile, Interpol has issued a "Red Notice" asking people to contact the police if they have any information about Mr Assange's whereabouts.

It said the Australian was wanted for questioning in Sweden over an alleged sex offence, which he has denied.

 
More on the latest from Interpol (also attached if link doesn't work):
Sweden authorizes INTERPOL to make public Red Notice for WikiLeaks founder

ASSANGE
Julian Paul

LYON, France - INTERPOL has made public the Red Notice, or international wanted persons alert, for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at the request of Swedish authorities who want to question him in connection with a number of sexual offences.

The Red Notice for the 39-year-old Australian, which was issued to law enforcement in all 188 INTERPOL member countries on 20 November, has now been made publicly available by INTERPOL following official authorization by Sweden.

All INTERPOL National Central Bureaus (NCBs) have also been advised to ensure that their border control agencies are made aware of Assange's Red Notice status, which is a request for any country to identify or locate an individual with a view to their provisional arrest and extradition.

Many of INTERPOL's member countries however, consider a Red Notice a valid request for provisional arrest, especially if they are linked to the requesting country via a bilateral extradition treaty. In cases where arrests are made based on a Red Notice, these are made by national police officials in INTERPOL member countries.

INTERPOL cannot demand that any member country arrests the subject of a Red Notice. Any individual wanted for arrest should be considered innocent until proven guilty.
 
I remember when they first called him a child molester. Poor translation from the Swedish. Turns out he was dating two women at once in Sweden. After the two talked to each other charges were laid and them promptly dropped after a very brief investigation. Swedish authorities allowed him to exit the country.  He hasn't been charged and no one bothered to call his lawyer(they had the number) to ask him to a appear for an interview.

Turns out the next leak is a Bank of America hard drive from a senior executive.
 
Ironically, the best thing I'm getting out of this, is where to go for my news. I get to either choose an objective news media hat publishes what they're given, analyzes what they're given, and realizes the overall effect on the world is minimal - having done nothing but shaken up world diplomacy a bit (which it needed); or, I can choose the media that avoids directly confronting the issues, and instead only comments on what cables relate to themselves or has some juicy gossip about Canadians (CBC), or avoids it altogether and instead focuses on demonizing the source (CNN). CNN has Assange as its front page - and spent a good 12-24 hours discussing how he's been placed on Interpol's "Most Wanted List".


If you fail to provide a transparent government, someone else will make it transparent for you.
 
hold_fast said:
CNN has Assange as its front page - and spent a good 12-24 hours discussing how he's been placed on Interpol's "Most Wanted List".
lol. He's only wanted for questioning.
 
Assange faces 'assassination risk'

LONDON - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is at risk of being assassinated over the release of secret U.S. documents and will remain in hiding for his own security, the website's spokesman said Wednesday.

Spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said the Australian's safety was at stake after U.S. politicians called for him to face treason charges and an adviser to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper reportedly said he should be killed.

"We have had threats from governments and commentators, some of them totally preposterous, even calls for the assassination of Julian Assange," Hrafnsson said during a debate at the Frontline Club in London.

"He is justified in being concerned for his safety. When you have people calling, for example, for his assassination, it is best to keep a low profile," he added.

Hrafnsson said Assange's whereabouts would remain secret. He is known to have recently spent time in Sweden and London and is the subject of an Interpol arrest request over a rape allegation in Sweden.

He has faced calls from the United States for his arrest, with Mike Huckabee, a former Republican presidential hopeful, reportedly saying that those responsible for the leaks were guilty of treason and should face execution, CNN reported.

Separately, Tom Flanagan, an adviser to Canada's prime minister, said flippantly in a television interview that Assange "should be assassinated" and that U.S. President Barack Obama "should put out a contract and maybe use a drone."

Hrafnsson, an Icelandic former journalist, defended Assange's decision to remain in hiding and not to face up to the Swedish arrest warrant, saying the timing of the Interpol alert was "curious".

"He is in a secret location and working on the project with a group of our staff. It is necessary in the circumstances to keep his location secret," Hrafnsson said.

The spokesman also pointed to the fact that WikiLeaks was suffering repeated cyber attacks as evidence that it was being targeted.

"We know the interest of the U.S. government in bringing down WikiLeaks," he said.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton accused WikiLeaks on Monday of an "attack on the international community" by releasing the documents, but Hrafnsson insisted that WikiLeaks had done nothing illegal.

"There has been a lot of talk about legal actions taken against Wikileaks and Julian, about how we have done something illegal, that we are criminals, but we have not seen any reference to how we are supposed to have broken the law," he said.
LINK
                                          (Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act)
 
WikiLeaks revelations? Or, burnin’ rubber
http://unambig.com/wikileaks-revelations-or-burnin-rubber/

A lot of smoke, very little fire.  This is what Spiegel Online (Der Spiegel is one of the major media recipients of material from Assiduous ******* Assange) manages to highlight today, focused on Russia...

INTERACTIVE ATLAS
0,1020,3344029,00.jpg

http://www.spiegel.de/flash/flash-24861.html
...

So now a hatred-driven, mainly single target site, rather than a principled one aimed at tous azimuts. Thanks to that AAA fellow.

The Guardian also has an interactive map:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cables-wikileaks

And the NY Times lists cables on Canada here:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/28/world/20101128-cables-viewer.html?ref=wikileaks#report/canada-04OTTAWA3115

Mark
Ottawa
 
Actually, some of these leaks are quite comical.
As soon as something or another tarnishes in the least the Americans
they get all hyper about it and start sending out "secret wires" one to the other ;D

I enjoy the wire on anti-American Canadian TV ;D
PRIMETIME IMAGES OF US-CANADA BORDER PAINT U.S. IN
INCREASINGLY NEGATIVE LIGHT

Quote:
"When American TV and movie producers want action,
the formula involves Middle Eastern terrorists, a ticking
nuclear device, and a (somewhat ironically, Canadian) guy
named Sutherland. Canadian producers don't need to look so
far -- they can find all the action they need right on the
U.S.-Canadian border."

But.....hey
American TV colourfully paints whomever they want.
Are the middle eastern countries sending out "hot wires" saying that the U.S. is tarnishing them ?
I guess that is why in the U.S. they say "Don't tread on me" (while I tread on you) :nana:

 
Defence staff warned to steer clear of WikiLeaks docs
Article Link
By Tobi Cohen, Postmedia News December 2, 2010

OTTAWA — Defence Department staff have been warned against using government computers to sift through secret documents released by WikiLeaks.

An email dubbed "Wikileaks Notice" in the subject line says military computers are "not to be used to visit the Wikileaks (sic) site or any other websites containing such information."

The memo from the assistant deputy minister for information management says doing so amounts to "unauthorized use" under the department's "acceptable use of the Internet, Defence Intranet and other electronic networks and computers" directive.

Canadian Forces IT staff "may monitor attempts to view this site's material and will report attempts to the affected chains of command," it adds.

The department fears accessing the site could expose government computers to "malicious search engine poisoning attacks" and that third parties might "collect and exploit visitor data or deliver malicious software through downloaded files."

As some of the information may be classified, downloading it onto or viewing it from government computers could also be a breach of security policy, it says.

Staff were also warned to consider the similar risk of contamination to personal computers, smart phones and flash drives that access the site. The memo notes transferring data from such devices to department computers is "not authorized."

Defence spokesman John MacLean said a similar warning was issued in July after the whistleblower website released thousands of war logs concerning Afghanistan.
More on link
 
Yep, Wikileaks documents are well known to contain worms. For an org that is so against the things they leak, they sure do a lot of it themselves.
 
Through the Canadian looking-glass in the WikiLeaks war
http://unambig.com/through-the-canadian-looking-glass-in-the-wikileaks-war/

Jack Granatstein shrinks us in the Ottawa Citizen:

    Alice in Wonderland is right...

Mark
Ottawa
 
HavokFour said:
Yep, Wikileaks documents are well known to contain worms. For an org that is so against the things they leak, they sure do a lot of it themselves.

Please cite something of merit to back this up, because I'm pretty convinced it's complete bull.
 
Interesting.

Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act.

Ex-Harper adviser should be charged: Assange


03/12/2010 12:46:49 PM
CTV.ca News Staff

LINK

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says a former adviser to Prime Minister Stephen Harper should face criminal charges for suggesting that the Australian whistleblower should be killed.

During an online interview with London's Guardian newspaper, Assange commented on Tom Flanagan's recent suggestion that he "should be assassinated" for his role in the public release of U.S. diplomatic cables.

"It is correct that Mr. Flanagan and the others seriously making these statements should be charged with incitement to murder," Assange told the Guardian website on Friday.

Flanagan, who previously served as Harper's chief of staff, has already apologized for the controversial remarks he made earlier this week while appearing on a political talk show.

During the show, Flanagan suggested that U.S. President Obama "should put out a contract or maybe use a drone or something" to kill Assange.

Appearing on the same program a day later, Flanagan apologized for his "thoughtless, glib remark about a serious subject."

Flanagan said he "never seriously intended to advocate or propose the assassination of Mr. Assange."

Assange has come under fire in recent days after WikiLeaks began publishing an initial wave of diplomatic cables to its website on Sunday. It plans to put 250,000 such documents on the Internet over time.

At the moment, Swedish authorities are seeking to question Assange "in connection with a number of sexual offences," according to an Interpol news release. The 39-year-old has denied that he has done anything wrong.

Additionally, the United States has made notice that it has "an active, ongoing criminal investigation" into the release of its diplomatic cables.

With files from The Canadian Press


 
hold_fast said:
Please cite something of merit to back this up, because I'm pretty convinced it's complete bull.
Assange and lots of the wikilinks "freedom fighters" are former or active hackers. Assange is well documented for it. Why is it hard to believe they have worms in the docs?

Honest question.
 
George Wallace said:
Interesting.

Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act.

Ex-Harper adviser should be charged: Assange


03/12/2010 12:46:49 PM
CTV.ca News Staff

LINK

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says a former adviser to Prime Minister Stephen Harper should face criminal charges for suggesting that the Australian whistleblower should be killed.

Ironic is a more appropriate word.

Ironic that a self proclaimed champion of free speech would advocate criminal charges for what other say. Ironic as well that he hasn't come forward to face his own criminal charges at the same time.
 
ModlrMike said:
Ironic that a self proclaimed champion of free speech would advocate criminal charges for what other say. Ironic as well that he hasn't come forward to face his own criminal charges at the same time.
and it's also hypocrisy that he proclaims that his location ought to be secret when he felt it was in the "greater good" to publish names of Coalition contacts in Afghanistan whilst the war is ongoing. 
 
Tea with the Economist. Julian Assange

http://www.economist.com/blogs/multimedia/2010/07/wikileaks_and_afghan_papers?sort=desc#sort-comments
 
Container said:
Assange and lots of the wikilinks "freedom fighters" are former or active hackers. Assange is well documented for it. Why is it hard to believe they have worms in the docs?

Honest question.

Because they've consciously avoided illegal activities and to put a worm in a document that would search out and actually CAUSE leaks would be illegal. What they're doing now is essentially not illegal, as they weren't the ones who leaked the material.

And because as far as I know, you can't put a damn worm in an HTML file that's encoded so simply. To say that there's viruses in the documents they're releasing is blatant fear mongering without a basis aside from your conspiratorial thoughts.

Lastly, demonizing someone for being a "former or active hacker" is pretty lame, considering many 'hackers' (I'd venture to say the majority) are actively engaged in network security operations - especially the most famous former hackers who have served time. For example - the hacker who blew the whistle on Bradley Manning, Adrian Lamo. See also Mitnick, Poulsen, Abene, Tappan Morris, etc. etc.
 
For every white hat you can name, I bet you'll find there are 5 black hats you don't know about who they are trying to defend against.

Assange has made it his mission to gather information, and he clearly doesn't care that its classified material. Yes, some of the leaks were intentional, but I really doubt the corporate ones that he has (if he has any) were just given to him. He got them somehow, and dollars to donuts it was through a computer.
 
Back
Top