- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
i was wondering if someone could tell me the order of ranks, i just want to know becuase i am constently getting confused with them, :-[, thanks,
militarygirl88
militarygirl88
Michael OLeary said:It may be that the term "senior NCO" is an unofficial colloquialism used to refer to the sergeants and warrants (easier then saying "the Sergeants and Warrant Officers"), but that it has no official definition. Which would also help to explain why we see varying definitions offered, some, which you note, including or excluding the Warrant Officers.
militarygirl88 said:thanks for the info, it helped, just didnt want to call the wrong officer by the wrong rank, when i go in for my interview next week,
militarygirl88
RCA said:Sgt is the only SNCO rank in the army because all Warrant Officers are separate as actually at one time the were handed Warrents (like a commission scroll). I don't have a ref handy right know.
And if in doubt, approach any CWO and ask him if he is a SNCO. I'm sure he'd be happy to supply you with the appropriate answer. ;D
Therefore Warrant Offices are not considered NCOs.CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS
1.02 â “ DEFINITIONS
non-commissioned officer" means a member holding the rank of sergeant or corporal; (sous-officier)
3.08 â “ MASTER CORPORAL APPOINTMENT
(1) The Chief of the Defence Staff or such officer as he may designate may appoint a corporal as a master corporal.
(2) The rank of a master corporal remains that of corporal.
(3) Master corporals have seniority among themselves in their order of seniority as corporals.
(4) Master corporals have authority and powers of command over all other corporals
RCA said:http://www.forces.gc.ca/admfincs/subjects/qr_o/intro_e.asp
From QR&Os Vol 1 -
There was a msg out clraifying there is no such term as Sr or Jr NCMs and I will try and dig it up
INFANTRY JOURNAL, No 14, Fall 1986
A HISTORY LESSON BY WAY OF BACKGROUND
by LCol W.J. Aitchison, as Commandant of the Royal Canadian School of Infantry
1. In the good old bad old days of the Canadian Army, there were two types of people, called "officers" and interchangeably, "men" or "other ranks". The term "other ranks" was often abbreviated to "ORs". The latter group, that is "men" or "ORs" was subdivided into "men", "junior non-commissioned officers (Jr NCOs)` (note the space between "Jr" and " NCO") and "senior noncommissioned officers (Sr NCOs)". The term Jr NCO encompassed men of the ranks of Private (provided the man held the appointment of Lance-corporal but that's another story) and Corporal. The term Sr NCO included Corporals who has been appointed Lance-Sergeant (see the other story) , Sergeants, and Staff-Sergeants and was understood also to include Warrant officers Classes I and II. (Woe betide, however, the fool who called the RSM a Sr NCO.) Indications to the contrary, although WOs Classes I and II existed (with only the former correctly having been "warranted") the term "Warrant" as we know it today was not used. (For example, the home of all men, Lance-Sergeant and above was called the "Sergeants" Mess.)
MORE RECENT HISTORY - STILL BY WAY OF BACKGROUND
2. Latterly, that is since Integration, the term "Sr NCO" is normally taken to include only sergeants (in which case why not just call them that) and we have adopted the designation "Warrant officers" to describe those holding Warrant officer, Master Warrant Officer and Chief Warrant Officer rank. Not surprisingly, what was formerly known as the "Sergeants", is now known as the "warrant officers' and Sergeants'" Mess. The meaning of the term "Jr NCO" has not appreciably changed, although the creation of the appointment of Master Corporal has confused somewhat the status of the Corporal.
3. Pay attention because the next part is confusing.
PERSPECTIVE
4. The terms "Senior" and "Junior" as they are used in the context above do not relate to either age or time in rank. Rather, they describe the relative status of the included ranks and appointments. Neither in the days of the Army nor those of the Canadian Forces has any term like "Senior OR" or "Junior man" been used except where the reference was to time in rank or age. That is to say that there is no basis in usage or precedent for such terms they were simply never needed.
5. Recently, we have had introduced the term "Non-Commissioned Members". There are two reasons for the introduction of this term, both of which must be understood if the term is to be properly used. The first relates to sexism and the second to sensitivity (though some may be sensitive to sexism).
SEXISM AND TERMINOLOGY
6. "Men" is defined in the National Defence Act to include members of the Forces who are:
a. not officers; and
b. male or female (is there a third choice?).
7. Although the term is not intended to be gender specific, there are 'those' who object to it on the same grounds that 'they' have used in forcing the coining of terms such as "chairperson", "fireperson", "cowperson" and "persons of easy virtue". Enough back-ground to the sexist issue.
SENSITIVITY AND TERMINOLOGY
8. There are others of 'those' out 'there' who feel that the term "Other Rank" is a pejorative one. Again, as it was used in the NDA, it was not intended to be, but rather described someone who was:
a. not an officer; and
b. male or female.
9. If this sounds familiar, remember that I told you in paragraph 1. that the terms 'men' and 'other ranks' were interchangeable.
TERMINOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY
10. The concern ones thought to themselves, "Since major amendment to the NDA is long overdue, why not include the minor amendment of 'what-we-call-our- soldiers-who-are-not-officers-and-who-are-either-male-or-female' in the major amendment and kill two birds with one stone? - so they did. They proposed a number of terms to the CDS and he directed that the term " Non-Commissionned Member" abbreviated "NCM" be adopted to replace the terms "man" and "other rank" as those latter two terms were used in the NDA.
11. What we have then, is the current situation.
WHAT BUGS ME (NOT A LIST)
12. ... as a (hopefully) literate English-speaking person, is INTER ALIA the creation of terms when they are not needed. The Adjutant will attest to this, if attestation is required. I therefore shudder to read, as I too recently have, such group designations as "SrNCMs" and "JrNCMs" and, disgusting as it was, "NCMIC".
THE BOTTOM LINE(S)
13. There is a legal requirement for the term NCM. There will, in time, be wider use of the term based on familiarity. At present, it is too frequently misused. It is not necessary in course reports prepared here at the School where the traditional terms "WO" and "NCO" adequately describe the rank groupings which they include. It is equally unnecessary in PERs where phrases such as "He (or she) is the best Private in the Company" are both correct and descriptive. If you feel it appropriate, by all means use `NCM" to describe Forces personnel who are:
a. not officers;
b. either male or female; and
c. for whom some other equally descriptive term is not available,
B U T
DON'T USE IT IN WORK FOR MY SIGNATURE!