- Reaction score
- 1,960
- Points
- 1,060
i fail to see what the difficulty will be for the CPC's. They will in all likelihood have in excess of 200 seats. Do it and do it quick and get it over with. To not do so risks fracturing the conservative vote again
Just some semantics but that wasn't a 'ban'. There was no OIC or declaration that the Swiss Arms Classic Green or CZ 858s were prohibited by name, rather they were reclassified to accurately follow Canadian law by the firearms lab. The CZ 858s as converted autos and the Swiss Arms as converted autos/550 variants.The CPC's Bill C-42 in 2014 lifted the ban on the Swiss Arms Classic Green Carbine. So, yes, they have reversed bans in the past.
The issue is that the legislative process in both houses is not quick and the Liberals (through the Independent and Progressive Senators Groups) still dominate the Senate.i fail to see what the difficulty will be for the CPC's. They will in all likelihood have in excess of 200 seats. Do it and do it quick and get it over with. To not do so risks fracturing the conservative vote again
Well unless they dont plan on passing any legislation at all, theyre going to have to suck it up and deal with it.The issue is that the legislative process in both houses is not quick and the Liberals (through the Independent and Progressive Senators Groups) still dominate the Senate.
My point exactly... The CPC has never really done anything to "bring stuff back".
The Swiss Arms Class Green was a complicated and niche situation, and how many Canadians did that even effect? Not many, maybe a couple hundred if that?
As far as owning interesting stuff, the only real advantage of the CPC for gun owners is they won't ban anything additional while they're in power. That's literally about it. They'll let the LPC do the banning and attack them for going after "law abiding gun owners" and then just kind of do nothing about it.
PPC?So who should gun owner vote for ?
Don’t start that shit, again.PPC?
So who should gun owner vote for ?
but we werent talking about the next election but the one after in which the CPC had failed to reverse the Liberal gun bansDon’t start that shit, again.
Gun owners should vote Conservative, this next election, to help destroy the Liberal Party for a generation.
When the Liberals are trying to rebuild, if they are crazy enough to keep the “open voting” system for party leader, someone from the firearms community should run for leadership of the Liberals. If even 10% of firearms owners in Canada vote, we could capture what’s left of the Liberal Party with a single issue leader.
That would be awesome….
‘Revenge on Society Crimes’
This is how people in China label these attacks.
In November alone, three took place: A man struck people at an elementary school in Hunan province, wounding 30, after suffering investment losses. A student who failed his examination stabbed and killed eight at a vocational school in the city of Yixing. The most victims, 35 people, resulted from a man mowing down a crowd in the southern city of Zhuhai, supposedly upset over his divorce.
Keeping a tight lid on the killings
A decade ago, media outlets could report an incident as it developed and even share a suspect’s name. Nowadays, it’s rarely possible.
During the 24 hours before the death toll was released in the Zhuhai slaying, state censors were quick to remove any videos of the incident and eyewitness accounts shared online. In the case of the Hunan elementary school attack, authorities shared the number of the wounded only after the court sentencing, nearly a month later.
A tally of violent attacks can be documented in other countries; notably, the U.S. had 38 mass killings so far this year, according to an Associated Press database. But in China, a lack of public data makes it hard to decipher mass killing trends.
Society has been conditioned by politicians and high ranking LEOs not to step in and attempt to help. One guy with a knife? Yeah me and a few others might get cut - bad - but damned if I am going to stand by and watch.Knives and cars only. The knife attacks are particularly interesting when comparing the number of puncture wounds and effective strikes by one individual in a panicked crowd to similar events with magazine fed weapons.
Society has been conditioned by politicians and high ranking LEOs not to step in and attempt to help. One guy with a knife? Yeah me and a few others might get cut - bad - but damned if I am going to stand by and watch.
Society has been conditioned by politicians and high ranking LEOs not to step in and attempt to help. One guy with a knife? Yeah me and a few others might get cut - bad - but damned if I am going to stand by and watch.
OIC's are not going away, they are a fundamental tool of day to day governance. My understanding is that the current Firearms Act is written in such a way that firearms cannot be moved from the Prob/Restricted category to NR by OIC, it's a one way trip with this legislation. So the whole Act needs replacing. On the first day in, they can freeze any actions that harm gun owners while they await legislation changes.