- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 110
I was just wondering what you men and women in the army thought was the most likely target.
It only gave me five options, I picked the biggest cities and the capital.Che said:You missed the entire atlantic region.
*phew* I'm safe
yeah, that'll work. Couldn't possibly backfire in any way. : Never mind that's immoral, illegal, and a whole hockey-sock of negative-sounding "i" words, it's silly. By making things better for those suffering under oppressive regimes (bullies, by any definition), we take away any real interest (a positive "i" word) in their attacking us. All we're doin' right now, is rippin' off a band-aid. Me, I prefer to do it quick and get it over with. You let it sit too long, it gets infected.Nielsen_Noetic said:This may sound a bit vindictive in nature but maybe the western world should fight fire with fire. Would it be possible for a western nation to fund christian fundamentalists to launch attacks against the east and get away with it?
Probably not eh, well I guess it's for the better, this way we can claim to be morally superior while we bomb their countries. Well while the U.S. does so anyways.
that's why you use the li'l smiley faces. Like at the end of your last post. Nice use of the word "impalpable", by the way. You never really see it any more. ;D Although, I don't think I explained much of anything in the way of humour or irony, I just jumped your shit,is all.Nielsen_Noetic said:Thank you for explaining all the impalpable irony and humour in my post I'm sure everyone benefited from your obvious assesment. :
Nielsen_Noetic said:Well while the U.S. does so anyways.