I know there is a thread on it, but couldn't find it....please move this if you find the proper thread....
Canadian soldier acquitted on charge of sexually assaulting female subordinate
By: Martin Ouellet, The Canadian Press 08/22/2014
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/canadian-soldier-acquitted-on-charge-of-sexually-assaulting-female-subordinate-272295001.html
QUEBEC - A Canadian Forces warrant officer threw himself into his lawyer's arms and his friends let out whoops of joy as he was acquitted Friday on a charge of sexually assaulting a female subordinate.
Andre Gagnon, 48, was on trial for the alleged sexual assault of then-corporal Stephanie Raymond in December 2011 at an armoury near Quebec City.
His court martial was overseen by a colonel in front of a panel of five male soldiers who reached the verdict.
Gagnon's lawyers said the sex was consensual, while the Crown argued that he used his superior rank to coerce Raymond, 30, into carnal acts.
One of Raymond's lawyers, Lt.-Col. Marylene Trudel, accused Gagnon during the court martial of using her client as an "open bar'' for his sexual gratification.
Gagnon faced one count under Sec. 130 of the National Defence Act as well as the Criminal Code section corresponding to sexual assault.
Raymond, who served under Gagnon, testified that he made advances, engaged in sexual touching and attempted to get oral sex after a holiday party.
Raymond, who was not present for the verdict, said she initially went along with his actions because she feared later reprisals.
The panel did not give reasons for its verdict, but Maj. Philippe-Luc Boutin, who defended Gagnon, said his client testified in a very clear and precise manner.
"He didn't try to hide or diminish his own involvement in the sexual exchange that was carried out," Boutin said.
"At the end of the day, I don't think Ms. Raymond had the same approach. She was very evasive on many issues . . . so the jury, I think, had serious doubts about the truthfulness of her story."
Raymond's lawyers said they will review the evidence and decide whether to appeal the verdict within 30 days.
more on link
- mod edit of thread title to better reflect more recent developments -