Bruce Monkhouse said:
I'm failing to see how you think your linguistic shortcomings make you any less "Canadian" or if anyone implied that.
This is a funny one!! ;D We used to say here in Quebec that Chretien wasn't proficient in english nor french!! Hehe, this is shortcomings...
Infanteer said:
No, no Bruce, I wasn't targeting what you said, I was only putting my thoughts on how we relate Language and being Canadian.
If I was born in BC and was raised in a French household, would I be a Francophone or a French Speaking Canadian? Is there something about the mythical line that surrounds the Belle Province that changes someone's status based upon what their mother tongue is?
Coming from Quebec, I relate 'extensively' to my province since there's a language diffence moreover. So you're born in Alberta, Albertan, Ontario, Ontarian, and so on...
I think for the language, you're mother tongue (and household when you were raised) indicates the roots, be it english, french, german, etc. But if you can't relate to it anymore, nor speak, forget it, you're were 'insert tongue-one...' and not anymore. It's not based on the province you come from. You were born in Alberta and learn french as mother tongue and speaks very well english (of course), you're Franco-Albertan if you use the language. If you can relate to the language as a certain identity, then why would it be more complicated than that?
Remember Chantal Hébert? She's colomnist at the
Star. Lot of people think she's québécoise. But she's born in Ontario and is Franco-Ontarian, only her parents are from Quebec. Now she lives in Québec, wanted to know her roots, but always related to herself as Franco-Ontarian.
Infanteer said:
2. On the flipside, if going with one tongue is too divisive, then I fully support Bilingualism in all schools (English to the French, French to the English) - as we will no longer have to worry about printing forms in both languages, having French/English military units, or signage; any Canadian should be able to pick either up and figure it out.
Here I disagree. You can't eliminate a language from forms or any other official communications. I would mean to exclude this language. Maybe I don't understand the point. As far as I know, Francophones are more bilingual (in the proportion of 47%) than Englos (9% says themselves as bilingual), which is normal anyway. Francophones of North America are in an ocean of Englos... really, not that much of a challenge to learn it. The thing is that it's important for a language health to keep it 'live', in all sorts of communication. You can't say you're a whatever-speaker if you don't use the language. Just a litteral reality.
Infanteer said:
Every Canadian, regardless of heritage, should be able to speak both English and French. Sure, some may argue that they have no need to learn it in Alberta, but perhaps something like this would do wonders in getting the French language out of Fortress Quebec and into mainstream Canadian (meaning across Canada) culture where it should be if we are to be a truely bilingual nation.
This is good!! That would be so much for me. It doesn't hinder any nationalism based on language, rather the other way around, it promotes it and would makes Canada stronger as its people understand what the other says and how he tends to think, would be so a great drive for unity and cohesion of Canada.
delavan said:
I'm a quebecer myself, and i agree with Bruce on that law. This is a bad thing. I"m glad that i joined the army ,so now it doesn't apply to me anymore. I've been able to put my little one in a 100% english school. She'll be glad i did when she'll grow up....
Even though I'm not bilingual myself, I can do really more than communicate in English and I didn't need any 100% english school to achieve that. Your results will be so much good as the effort you put in.
Cheers all,
Edited for quote problems.