• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Que. school worker outed as porn star, suspended

I like to line up to take some pictures of Selena Gomez. >:D.....she's a hotty....Bebier doesn't know how good he's got it....
 
How would the CF treat this?

It hits the news that Pte Candy who works for the Canadian Forces makes hardcore pornographic films. Would the CoC get involved or just ignore it?  Would it be distracting in the world place or a non-issue?
 
Grimaldus said:
It's just how society is. Like  45 year old women lining up for Justin Bebier signed pictures (and going crazy over him) compared to 45 year old men lining up for Selena Gomez pictures. Same same but different  ;D

Probably best I don't respond to that... :nod:
 
lol

You guys love her like a love song. Don't worry no one will judge that!
 
CDN Aviator said:
Don't be a hater......i would be in the line up to meet her.

The porn star or Selena?  Or both?  :bowing:
 
Nevertheless, I'll wager the former Secretary enjoys going to work nowadays. 
 
jollyjacktar said:
Nevertheless, I'll wager the former Secretary enjoys going to work nowadays.
Having glanced.....just momentarily ....at one of her videos (bless you Google), yes, she does seem to enjoy her work.  :nod:


I don't think she's quite ready to be a Volvo-driving soccer mom just yet.  ;)
 
Journeyman said:
Having glanced.....just momentarily ....at one of her videos (bless you Google), yes, she does seem to enjoy her work.  :nod:


I don't think she's quite ready to be a Volvo-driving soccer mom just yet.  ;)

Volvo?

Is this a typo?
 
Blackadder1916 said:
Volvo?

Is this a typo?
Google the band, Everclear, pondering the philosophical question of where do all the porn stars go.  ;)
 
Grimaldus said:
How would the CF treat this?

It hits the news that Pte Candy who works for the Canadian Forces makes hardcore pornographic films. Would the CoC get involved or just ignore it?  Would it be distracting in the world place or a non-issue?

Is it legal?

A friend of mine was once charged by the CF. She was a stripper after working hours. She won. Kingstonians may recall her. Hard to hold someone accountable for doing something 100 percent legal in this country and claim 'moral standards' when you choose not to hold the opposite sex who also wear the uniform accountable for their viewing the same stuff. If itès not OK for one to do, nor should it be good for the other to watch ... you know 'optics' and all that.
 
ArmyVern said:
Is it legal?

A friend of mine was once charged by the CF. She was a stripper after working hours. She won. Kingstonians may recall her. Hard to hold someone accountable for doing something 100 percent legal in this country and claim 'moral standards' when you choose not to hold the opposite sex who also wear the uniform accountable for their viewing the same stuff. If itès not OK for one to do, nor should it be good for the other to watch ... you know 'optics' and all that.
To carry on the tangent, perhaps, and not related to any specific employment, but is having any second job supposed to go through the CoC?  Pizza driver, stripper, whatever?
 
Technoviking said:
To carry on the tangent, perhaps, and not related to any specific employment, but is having any second job supposed to go through the CoC?  Pizza driver, stripper, whatever?

Yes, you are correct. We have already had a CF member do the porn thing too. Perhaps you met him in Oka as I know you were there too ...  >:D
 
Technoviking said:
but is having any second job supposed to go through the CoC?  Pizza driver, stripper, whatever?

Yes thats how it should work but, IMHO, it would make an interesting legal challenge if the CoC said "niet".
 
ArmyVern said:
Yes, you are correct. We have already had a CF member do the porn thing too. Perhaps you met him in Oka as I know you were there too ...  >:D
:rofl:
No, he was on the north side by Oka proper, I was near Kanawake (sp?) on the south shore.  (My story, and I'm sticking to it!)  :whistle:
 
It is in QR&O Vol 1, Art 19.42 - Civil Employment
19.42 – CIVIL EMPLOYMENT
(1) Subject to paragraph (3), no officer or non-commissioned member on full-time service shall engage in any civil employment or undertaking that in the opinion of the member’s commanding officer:

(a) is or is likely to be detrimental to the interests of the Canadian Forces;
(b) reflects or is likely to reflect discredit upon the Canadian Forces; or
(c) in the case of members of the Regular Force, is continuous.

(2) No officer or non-commissioned member on full-time service shall authorize the use of the member’s name or photograph in connection with a commercial product, except so far as the member’s name may be part of a firm name.

(3) Except that an officer or non-commissioned member shall not engage in any civil employment or undertaking that reflects or is likely to reflect discredit upon the Canadian Forces, this article does not apply to a member who is :

(a) on leave immediately preceding release; or
(b) on leave without pay.

It would be interesting if this went up against the Charter.
 
ArmyVern said:
Is it legal?

A friend of mine was once charged by the CF. She was a stripper after working hours. She won. Kingstonians may recall her. Hard to hold someone accountable for doing something 100 percent legal in this country and claim 'moral standards' when you choose not to hold the opposite sex who also wear the uniform accountable for their viewing the same stuff. If itès not OK for one to do, nor should it be good for the other to watch ... you know 'optics' and all that.

I couldn't agree more. I'm a huge proponent (Is that the right word?) of everyone being held to the same standard and someone not receiving worse treatment because they fall out of favor with "the crowd".

In the case of your friend I'd support her 100% but I would also remind her offline that while what she is doing may be legal she's going to face an uphill battle at work and if the CoC has it's sights on her because of that every little thing will be blown up.  Me and you could roll in a minute late now and then and no one would really make an issue. She rolls in 30 seconds late and gets a warning. Then they start to pick up on other little things that are all but unlocked in others. Hey are those boots a little dirty? Dress and deportment. Platoon *someone* has dirty combat boots, bring your DEUs in tomorrow for an inspection. (all eyes go to your friend).
 
dangerboy said:
It is in QR&O Vol 1, Art 19.42 - Civil Employment
(2) No officer or non-commissioned member on full-time service shall authorize the use of the member’s name or photograph in connection with a commercial product, except so far as the member’s name may be part of a firm name.

Would selling pornographic movies/pictures not be in violation of this?
 
Back
Top