Thucydides said:
I'm actually more pleased for reasons not mentioned yet on this board. The very fact that Doug Ford is on the table means that all kinds of issues, many of which the Liberals and deeper down Progressive academics, bureaucrats, media figures and politicians simply don't want to talk about will suddenly be back in play...The current "elites" are not going to let go without a fight, however, given that this is the source of their powers and privileges. It is certain that there will be a fight to the last taxpayer to decide if the Optimates or Populares will prevail.
Maybe. And certainly all institutions need scrutiny and a periodic overhaul. And the Liberals have very clearly fallen prey to "second-term-itis". But I would much prefer that scrutiny and overhaul were done in a logical, measured and intelligent way (you know..."conservative") which examines what is good and what is not.
What I don't want, and what I fear under a populist like Ford (or the likes of Granic-Allen who will probably form part of his tent), is that ithe base will be motivated by ignorance, anger and anecdotally-based beliefs rather than facts. Endlessly squawking about "elites" is usually a warning signal for me, since IMHO it normally refers to those rich and powerful people we DON'T like, as opposed to the rich and powerful people we DO like (or who bankroll our campaigns). It's another dog whistle or bumper sticker. Good for rallying the troops, but solves nothing.
Let me stake out my ground.
I am not an extreme social conservative, in the sense that I find discrimination on the basis of personal characteristics; the dominance of religion (any religion) in politics, and the rejection of science that interferes with somebody's political, religious or economic agenda to all be repulsive facets of what is often passing for populism in many Western countries these days. In my opinion, this strain of populism runs strongly in Ford's camp, and even more strongly in the groups whose votes he will curry over the next few months. I am a social conservative in the sense that I believe in private property, free enterprise and small business, law and order (including capital punishment), the private ownership of firearms with reasonable restrictions, and the concepts of responsibility and duty.
To be fair, we had a Ford-like character elected as the PC premier years ago, when Harris got in. He is still roundly cursed by many for things like the municipal amalgamations and the downloading of Provincial Highways and paramedic services onto the Counties, Regions and Districts. However, Ontario survived him, relatively intact. And, interestingly enough, Harris never privatized LCBO as I'm sure he saw what a cash cow it is.
I remain very, very skeptical.