H
hayder.aqiqi
Guest
I took a Class B mata/pata backfill which was 50weeks long. As soon as it finished, without skipping a heartbeat I was (with my permission of course) renewed on another mata/pata backfill for another 7 months.
If you're an expert you'll no doubt know that both of these B's had "no move auth" listed.
I recently came across a document on the directorate of pay and benefits administration ( I think it is ) Addendum A9.06 which clearly states that someone who was on contract for a period less than 1 year, but who is extended beyond that first year to anywhere less than 3 years, may very well be entitled to a move auth.
I've already submitted a memo, which got denied, stating that because I am on two separate Class B's it doesn't qualify.
I'm asking a few questions here.
If that is correct, and I'm SOL...what real chance do I have to redress this?
If that is not correct, what scenario WOULD allow that A9.06 to come into effect.
As a husband, double parent of a 2yr and 1 month old, and a sole provider, I'm beginning to feel very frustrated by how Reservists are treated. I'm expected to do everything the mbrs around me are doing, but am being left out of a fair bit...not to mention have to fight hard for what is mine.
IF THE REASONING BEHIND THE MEMO DENIAL IS CORRECT my redress point is mainly, flexibility/modification. It's not as though I'm going to another base and working another contract. I'm at the same unit, doing the same vital duty...just because the two contracts are separate shouldn't negate me from that entitlement?
If you're an expert you'll no doubt know that both of these B's had "no move auth" listed.
I recently came across a document on the directorate of pay and benefits administration ( I think it is ) Addendum A9.06 which clearly states that someone who was on contract for a period less than 1 year, but who is extended beyond that first year to anywhere less than 3 years, may very well be entitled to a move auth.
I've already submitted a memo, which got denied, stating that because I am on two separate Class B's it doesn't qualify.
I'm asking a few questions here.
If that is correct, and I'm SOL...what real chance do I have to redress this?
If that is not correct, what scenario WOULD allow that A9.06 to come into effect.
As a husband, double parent of a 2yr and 1 month old, and a sole provider, I'm beginning to feel very frustrated by how Reservists are treated. I'm expected to do everything the mbrs around me are doing, but am being left out of a fair bit...not to mention have to fight hard for what is mine.
IF THE REASONING BEHIND THE MEMO DENIAL IS CORRECT my redress point is mainly, flexibility/modification. It's not as though I'm going to another base and working another contract. I'm at the same unit, doing the same vital duty...just because the two contracts are separate shouldn't negate me from that entitlement?