LPC leadership race - 2025

[Remius]

Would you consider them contestants though?

Yes. Why wouldn’t they be?

Gould openly talked shit about the Liberal Party in her vote for me emails to party members. She's since toned down and it's as if everyone is reading off the same page. Kind of like they're trying to give the impression of choice for the next party leader.

That may also be language issue as maybe none of them are that comfortable in French to do that. Either way I prefer parties debate policy with themselves rather than self destruct and provide their opponents fodder in a larger election run.

I can see a slip up on wording speaking French but Carney completely flipped his positiin on using emergency powers when speaking in Quebec. THAT didn't seem very accidental.

Speaking on both sides of the language isle isn’t new.

 

[Remius]

You realize he wants to use Canadian tax payers money to rebuild Gaza? Terrible idea. I don't know if he brought it up last night (I only caught the highlights)

Didn’t hear that. But his plan for economic ties with UK, NZ and Australia caught my attention.

 

[ArmyRick]

Didn’t hear that. But his plan for economic ties with UK, NZ and Australia caught my attention.

I am all for opening global trade outside the USA, not China or Russia (If you listen to Pierre Poilievre, this is what he stated as part of his plan weeks ago)

Frank a few weeks ago talked about this (rebuilding Gaza). Take note Montreal has a large number of Palestinian refugees/immigrants

 

[Jarnhamar]

Yes. Why wouldn’t they be?

I've still still convinced they've been told who the next party leader is and they better go along with it.

The Liberals, known for the importance they put in ethics, really rushed Dhalla out of there before she could speak at the debate.

That may also be language issue as maybe none of them are that comfortable in French to do that.

Sure but even Carneys team admitted to "mixed messaging" and not a wrongly translated word when speaking about pipelines. That was intentionally disinformation they got called on.

Either way I prefer parties debate policy with themselves rather than self destruct and provide their opponents fodder in a larger election run.

Did they end up disagreeing about anything?

 

[Remius]

I've still still convinced they've been told who the next party leader is and they better go along with it.

The Liberals, known for the importance they put in ethics, really rushed Dhalla out of there before she could speak at the debate.

Possibly. Dhalla though was not a serious candidate in any reality.

Sure but even Carneys team admitted to "mixed messaging" and not a wrongly translated word when speaking about pipelines. That was intentionally disinformation they got called on.

I was referring to his Hamas I speak. But yes. I hear mixed messaging all the time from all sides so not overily concerned. I’d like there to be none but that’s a pipe dream.

Did they end up disagreeing about anything?

Not really. How to handle Trump a bit. But nothing earth shattering. And some pushback on Freeland’s experience in dealing with Trump. Gould and Carney. Oth saying the Trump of today isn’t the same Trump today.

Honestly I suspect you are looking at Carmey and his top cabinet ministers at that debate.