Not really a new story, so my apologies if its already been posted here (did a search and found nothing).
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080122.wafghhack0122/BNStory/International/home
It is ridiculous and unfortunate that some people have chosen to attack the practice of dog fighting as a reason that Canadian soldiers shouldn't be in Afghanistan. However, this perversion of justice presents more of a problem. While it is unrealistic to think that Afghanistan will flower into a liberal democracy (that's not why we are there anyways), a man being handed down a death sentence for possessing a document that supports women's rights is a step in the wrong direction to say the least. No one wants to dictate to the Afghans how they should live, but Canadian soldiers are dying to support the Karzai government, while this very same government is allowing such things to happen. Apparently the Canadian government has "strongly objected" to this man's imprisonment and death sentence, but is that enough? I know there are definite risks in linking a military policy too directly with a political policy (if Vietnam was a lesson), but perhaps the Canadian government should make it clear that there will be consequences if this is not resolved soon. Anyways, this development is disturbing to say the least.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080122.wafghhack0122/BNStory/International/home
It is ridiculous and unfortunate that some people have chosen to attack the practice of dog fighting as a reason that Canadian soldiers shouldn't be in Afghanistan. However, this perversion of justice presents more of a problem. While it is unrealistic to think that Afghanistan will flower into a liberal democracy (that's not why we are there anyways), a man being handed down a death sentence for possessing a document that supports women's rights is a step in the wrong direction to say the least. No one wants to dictate to the Afghans how they should live, but Canadian soldiers are dying to support the Karzai government, while this very same government is allowing such things to happen. Apparently the Canadian government has "strongly objected" to this man's imprisonment and death sentence, but is that enough? I know there are definite risks in linking a military policy too directly with a political policy (if Vietnam was a lesson), but perhaps the Canadian government should make it clear that there will be consequences if this is not resolved soon. Anyways, this development is disturbing to say the least.