- Reaction score
- 9,296
- Points
- 1,260
"First-hand experience" is not necessarily actual service with a particular unit. By being in the a specific branch of the military, one has experience in working with other trades; this is why all soldiers can debate issues regarding branches that they are not a member of, but have some sort of experience in dealing with due to their duties. As well, official information that a soldier is privy to will come down the pipeline regarding JTF-2 and other topics. There is a body of common knowledge that is available to those who serve through a variety of sources that allow them to speak with some degree of authority.
As well, belonging to a military gives one a common background with others in with the same duties, allowing them to communicate about each others experiences. I have in some extent encountered members of some Special Operation Forces in my time such as the JTF-2, Navy SEALS, etc. Although the information is second hand and must be treated as such do to the fact that it is related by someone else, it can be taken as pretty accurate do to the qualifications of the source.
As well, academic sources may have varying degrees of authenticity due to the fact that they will (try to) make objective studies of readily available official facts and information
Do your claims meet any of the above criteria? If they don't (which I am quite sure of) then all they accomplish here is a waste of everybody's time in having to correct misinformation and explain why your posts are pure BS.
As well, belonging to a military gives one a common background with others in with the same duties, allowing them to communicate about each others experiences. I have in some extent encountered members of some Special Operation Forces in my time such as the JTF-2, Navy SEALS, etc. Although the information is second hand and must be treated as such do to the fact that it is related by someone else, it can be taken as pretty accurate do to the qualifications of the source.
As well, academic sources may have varying degrees of authenticity due to the fact that they will (try to) make objective studies of readily available official facts and information
Do your claims meet any of the above criteria? If they don't (which I am quite sure of) then all they accomplish here is a waste of everybody's time in having to correct misinformation and explain why your posts are pure BS.