Future Armour

[KevinB]

I see your Sqn per Bde and would raise you a Cav Regt under 1 Can Div.

Which I would accept if you guys did anything at the Div level anymore. I tend to believe that the CA is foolish enough to make DIV resources on in theory these days.

I would be less irritated by the TAPV if it had an ATGM to allow longer covered bounds. In its current form it’s a non issue. The better options could fill pages, but I like the Jaguar myself.

As much as I like to complain about off-road mobility on the LAV, I could easily fill pages about trying to conduct any sort of tactical mobility off road with the TAPV. The ground pressure on those 4 tires means it’s going to sink into a lot of terrain.

The M1117 works down here, simply for what it is used for - convoy escort and airfield security, both which are fairly road bound.

 

[PrairieFella]

[...] I could easily fill pages about trying to conduct any sort of tactical mobility off road with the TAPV. The ground pressure on those 4 tires means it’s going to sink into a lot of terrain.

To say the least it's sketchy as shit and is not suitable offroad in any sort of adverse terrain. Man do drivers get good at picking good ground though.