Brad Sallows
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 8,761
- Points
- 1,040
Why? My point is that politicians fear-monger, which covers a lot more ground than the single plot you've staked out for yourself.Ok, you’re included in my cordial invitation:
Why? My point is that politicians fear-monger, which covers a lot more ground than the single plot you've staked out for yourself.Ok, you’re included in my cordial invitation:
Peterson has “escape velocity”, he won’t be negatively impacted by this financially. In fact, I think you’re right, he’ll gain in popularity. But this isn’t about him. It’s about sending a message to everyone else who doesn’t have the escape velocity Peterson does, and the message is this: if you go against the narrative we‘ll wreck you.This is only going to boost JP popularity and fame. Keep or lose his license, he will gain even more of a larger following. Its a win for JP either way.
Why? My point is that politicians fear-monger, which covers a lot more ground than the single plot you've staked out for yourself.
Peterson has “escape velocity”, he won’t be negatively impacted by this financially. In fact, I think you’re right, he’ll gain in popularity. But this isn’t about him. It’s about sending a message to everyone else who doesn’t have the escape velocity Peterson does, and the message is this: if you go against the narrative we‘ll wreck you.
He's almost like J.K Rowling, too big to be cancelled... The rest of us though, we are easy pickings for the "mob", aided by bureaucrats interested in preserving themselves.Peterson has “escape velocity”, he won’t be negatively impacted by this financially. In fact, I think you’re right, he’ll gain in popularity. But this isn’t about him. It’s about sending a message to everyone else who doesn’t have the escape velocity Peterson does, and the message is this: if you go against the narrative we‘ll wreck you.
The part that amazes me is his opinions by and large wouldn’t even cause a ounce of outrage 20 years ago. Not saying I agree with everything he says, but he certainly makes good points on many topics.The amount of outrage Peterson causes in his wake is hilarious. People act like any contradiction of what they feel is the truth is persecution against them.
No credible threat of success, but a legitimate attempt.There was never a credible threat of these people overthrowing the govegovernment.
Please, Please, Please: EVERYONE read and understand this.If the "threat of overthrowing the government" is the issue, then we seriously need explanations and for the press to do its job, which is to educate the public.
Earlier in this forum ,someone mentioned the removal of the "duly elected government" of Canada. That is an impossibility as we do not and have never in our history elected a government. The Government of Canada is headed by the King, and he appoints someone as Prime Minister and asks her/him to form a governement of the day, but the actual "Governement" composed of King, ministers and public servants is permanent - there must always be one. If we elected governements, Erin O'Toole would be PM because he garnered the most votes across Canada.
We only elect our Members of Parliament and their only powers against the governement are to (1) hold the various ministers accountable to Parliament (something in short supply and disappearing fast as political parties have usurped Parliaments powers) and (2) withdraw their confidence in a siting Prime Minister, causing the King to either replace him/her with someone else who does have the confidence of the lower chamber or call a general election.
To overthrow the Government of Canada, they had better be circling and manifesting around Rideau Hall ... or Buckingham Palace. But then what? Create a Republic?
At most, they disrupted the operation of Parliament (and even that did not really happen as they never moved in to take control of Parliamnet hill or directly threaten any of the MP refusing to do their biding. Their anger was directed at the decisions of the siting PM and his ministers. They could call for his removal, but only the King or the House of Commons could effect such removal. Yet, even that would not be overthrowing governement. It would be continuation of the governemetn under a new PM and council of ministers.
So while asking for removal of the PM and his replacemetn by a group that included them, they were basically exercising their freedom of expression - loudly and annoyingly - in a situation where it was impossible for them to succeed.
I'd say that "asking" and demanding under threat of "choking out" a city are fundamentally different actions.So while asking for removal of the PM and his replacemetn by a group that included them, they were basically exercising their freedom of expression - loudly and annoyingly - in a situation where it was impossible for them to succeed.
That’s the part the government is so bad at, and I don’t think it’s by design.Peterson has “escape velocity”, he won’t be negatively impacted by this financially. In fact, I think you’re right, he’ll gain in popularity. But this isn’t about him. It’s about sending a message to everyone else who doesn’t have the escape velocity Peterson does, and the message is this: if you go against the narrative we‘ll wreck you.
I don’t think the stated intent was ever to oust the PM, or usurp the PM with their own person & use the powers inherent within the PMO to “blatantly swing like a club.”I'd say that "asking" and demanding under threat of "choking out" a city are fundamentally different actions.
But honestly, the thing I can't get past is the hilarious irony and lack of self-awareness in a group of people trying to combat tyranny by attempting to extort their way into power, with the stated intent of wielding that power like a club to commit a ridiculously blatant and sweeping act of Federal over reach.
Most of his opinions are even new (and he points this out himself); they are largely just reframed versions of the stoic philosophy from 2400 years ago.The part that amazes me is his opinions by and large wouldn’t even cause a ounce of outrage 20 years ago. Not saying I agree with everything he says, but he certainly makes good points on many topics.
Asking people to clean their own rooms first is the first step in self-responsibility and begins the journey away from victimhood and without that, what control does the Progressive Left have on people?Most of his opinions are even new (and he points this out himself); they are largely just reframed versions of the stoic philosophy from 2400 years ago.
I read his stuff to see what the controversy was and don't really get it
…neither slave to, nor abused by…The system is supposed to work for the people, the people aren’t supposed to be slaves to the system.
Not all.I don’t think the stated intent was ever to oust the PM, or usurp the PM with their own person & use the powers inherent within the PMO to “blatantly swing like a club.”
I don’t even think they had a person in mind to take over that position, had that even been their intent.
And the document was worth about as much as when I say that "I should be God"......Not all.
But the Bauder/MOU faction explicitly called for their installation on a ruling council (actually called a committee) with the senate and GG, and that said ruling council would unilaterally enforce their (MOU faction's) pseudo legal interpretations of everything regarding Covid measures across all levels of elected government -Federal, Provincial, Municipal.
They tried to force the senate/GG to enable them to dictate to all levels of elected government in the country, as well as the judiciary.
The result of a successfully enacted MOU would have been orders of magnitude more tyrannical than anything the Federal government did related to Covid.