- Reaction score
- 35
- Points
- 530
Excerpt from the BBC:
So....if 25% of 4,000 dead are civilians, that means that 75% are combatants, and based on released death tolls by NATO, we can extrapolate that 2,500+ dead were Taliban.
In addition, in context with the earlier part of the article, the "violence that has surged in recent weeks, with the onset of spring", has been primarily due to spring offensives by NATO forces.
1) How did this journalist ever write such a misleading article?
2) How did the editor allow it to be published?
[insert your choice of favourite expletives here]
Unbelievable....
Matthew.
Helmand fighting
In the south, Operation Silicon aims to drive Taleban fighters from their stronghold in the Sangin valley in Helmand province - the biggest poppy-producing area in the world for opium.
It is part of the wider Operation Achilles launched in March to prepare for reconstruction work in the area by the Afghan government.
The BBC's Alastair Leithead, who is with troops in the area, said the fighting has developed into a major battle on several fronts.
Apache helicopters and dozens of British armoured vehicles moved in at first light and heavy fighting went on for hours, he says.
Across Afghanistan, bloodshed has returned to levels not seen since the fall of the Taleban regime in 2001. Some 4,000 people are believed to have died last year in the insurgency - about a quarter of them civilians.
About 30,000 coalition troops and another 10,000 US-led ones have been battling to reduce violence and boost the authority of President Hamid Karzai.
Violence has surged in recent weeks, with the onset of spring.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6606535.stm
So....if 25% of 4,000 dead are civilians, that means that 75% are combatants, and based on released death tolls by NATO, we can extrapolate that 2,500+ dead were Taliban.
In addition, in context with the earlier part of the article, the "violence that has surged in recent weeks, with the onset of spring", has been primarily due to spring offensives by NATO forces.
1) How did this journalist ever write such a misleading article?
2) How did the editor allow it to be published?
[insert your choice of favourite expletives here]
Unbelievable....
Matthew.