[RESERVIST] So, you've heard it over 30 times in your military life. "CFAT". Now. To me, its hell. I'm really good with english and spatial skills...mathematical not so good. I've been in the military since January '08. BMQ/SQ Qualified. Currently in the Cook trade (not wanting), and currently working as a Veh. Tech (Class B). The irony is that Cook is the lowest on the test, and Veh. Tech is one of the highest. Funny how it works that way eh?
Anyway. So i failed the first time i took the CFAT by 1 mark. I was originally wanting Infantry with CHofO. That didn't turn out so well, my morale was shot, and i didn't have any other options except Cook and Steward. As i wanted neither at the time, i just walked away. The first time i took it I must have been about 16/17, still in High School. The second time around, i decided to retry it a year and a little later. I studied a bit the second time, clearly not as good as I should have so i failed the second time. My morale once again, shot, BUT, I took the Cook position to at least get my foot in the door and deal with the situation later on. I think it was a huge turning point in my life as it was a great strategy because this way I'm still able to do stuff inside the military. So since i joined as a Cook i've gotten BMQ/SQ done, as well as several taskings and exercises completed. As i've stated, I'm currently working as a Veh Tech on a Class B which is rather shocking considering its EME and i'm a SVC BN member as well as a "No-Hook" Private. I'd say as a Private, i lead a rather satisfactory life within the military.
The purpose of this thread was to inquire to methods of going abouts/around the CFAT. I know i'm a smart person, there is no doubt in my mind about it. I can't do written tests for crap, meaning the CFAT being an online test which to me translates as written, i failed to do well in. I'm definitely a hands-on learner. That's how i've done as well i have now. So, i'm wanting to roll over into Armored; Reg Force, but APARENTLY i'm going to have to redo the CFAT. Considering as to how I didn't do well the first/second time, i can't see me doing well now, and personally, if i fail again, its just going to be another mental thrashing and to be honest, it scares me, and it is probably the single most painful experience i've ever had in my life. Is there a way that i'm able to use whatever i've done in the military so far to present to CFRC and explain to them "I've done this and this and this, i work in one of the most difficult trades in the CF, is there a possibility of bypassing the CFAT?"
I come here because instead of going straight to the source, i want to hear other peoples thoughts first before i hear the real answer. People that i've met in the CF enjoy my company as I am always generating very positive morale all around, and that i am a dedicated, and hard worker.
On a sidenote, I would like to share my opinions on the CFAT. Before i start, its not b**ching or moaning. For me, it's expressing my thoughts because i'm not alone in these thoughts.
The CFAT (Canadian Forces Aptitude Test) is taken literally. It shouldn't be. (Pulled from Wikipedia): An aptitude is an innate, acquired or learned or developed component of a competency (being the others: knowledge, understanding and attitude) to do a certain kind of work at a certain level. The innate nature of aptitude is in contrast to achievement, which represents knowledge or ability that is gained.
The way I see it, is that whatever you get on the CFAT, should only be a guideline of what you can and can't do to give you a general idea of what you could possibly succeed at. Needless to say, i think the CFAT is entirely bogus. The CFAT not only lowers morale, but it prevents candidates from doing whatever it is they want to do. For example, I wanted infantry. Based on what i've done in the military so far, i've done the equivalent as that to a DP1 qualified Infanteer. I've had ZERO problems in both Infantry expectations as well as EME Veh Tech expectations. The CFAT cannot and should not limit you to what you can and cannot do. It just isn't fair and it isn't morally right to do it to people. As for me, i've always been bummed I didn't "pass" the CFAT no matter what i've done in the military. As a Cook right now, i don't want the trade. Not because it's no good, it's just nothing i want to do.
As for the Cook trade, it is VERY demanding and requires alot of mathematical skills as well as a large amount of responsibility to follow. No matter what score you get on the CFAT, it should not determine what you do. If you cannot do the trade, it will simply come down to how well you perform during your trades courses. As for me, i've seen what to expect as a cook, infanteer AND Armored. All of which i am able to do with absolute ease. Why can't I try the trades? Because i can't get on-screen math questions right. You can't use a calculator, which in most mathematical situations you get in, you have either a calculator or a friend to help you out. Either way, the problem will be solved one way or another. One thing is for sure, my math mark determined my trade between Infantry, and Cook. As a cook, good math skills are a MUST as you have to convert measurements which can be very tricky. The only time you'll frequently need math (to my knowledge) is for Navigation which I believe you don't do very often . Granted its great and handy to know how to Nav, but anyone can learn it, no matter how strong your skills are.
Lets say you only qualify to be a cook, and you fail at it. The test said that you could do it. Yes, bold statement, but, then again, if you're not able to do infantry, it's because you don't meet the mental capacity. Then why did you fail at the Cook trade even while you were legitimately trying, (because you could say that failure didn't try at all. Lets assume hypothetically he tried his hardest).
So with that said, if you can't get that, why offer any trades at all? You can't fail it per-se. You can just not get what trade you want. But Cook and Steward are ALWAYS available. Why isn't any other trade?
Financial. I'm not a money guy, so admitting, i can't go too far into detail about this part. Based on what i've heard from other people in regards to my argument, "they" state that it's a money issue. They don't want to train people if they're going to fail. As far as i'm concerned, I don't care what you do, any trade you can fail/succeed at, no matter how smart you are.
If there is any input that you fine members of this forum would like to add, please feel free. I'm all ears.
P.S. Do you need to be QL3 qualified in the current trade before switching to the next? (This happened to a friend of mine.)