ArmyVern said:
I was referring to civilian populace - ergo why my statement said "nor is it the majority belief in my family etc who are not related to the military (just to make it real clear and obvious for you).
I've walked by the Parliament buildings ... I've never had opportunity to inhale the scents you have.
My home city is Ottawa and spent a lot of time in the downtown area which includes the Parliament. Also attended various events, watched politicians do their thing at the house of commons, had meetings with some MPs or munches at their offices, etc. Then there is the fact Parliament Hill is fun the walk around and hang out during the summer, saying to the Parliament cats, check out the view around back and such. So yes, had many opportunities to get acquainted with our Parliament, and in turn the occasional scents of pot which I have unfortunately familiarized just before high school.
Again, irregardless of your links (there's links that show other wise here in this thread) ... where is your link to the fact that the majority of Canadians want this legalized ... I'm still waiting. :
I never made that claim. I just said pot is prevalent in our country from my experience, and not just with the company I keep.
You get called in for a drug test and you have THC in your system, you'll have lots of explaining to do. There's a whole heck of a lot of pers here on this site who've been there and done that testing ... and we aren't turning up even a little (let alone in droves) with THC in our systems --- again --- perhaps it's the company you keep.
Apparently medical has not found any in my blood either (unless they did not check with the blood sample they took).
PLEASE: Link me to the forum guidelines (ie the site rules) where it states that I can't respond to a point YOU made in one of your posts? I eagerly await it --- I must have missed it during my time as a site mod.
Conditions as in the ones given to me by Directing Staff. Something to do with not seeking attention and being responsible for thread closures.
You want to discuss anything that differs with your point of view view PM?? THEN send your PoV via PM vice posting on threads.
You started discussing me in the personal, not the topic of the discussion and thread. I start responding to comments of the personal here, then next thing I know there is a dogpile, thread gets close, public and PM warnings by the DS, and potentially banned.
that's how it works for everyone else, yet apparently you seem to believe that you are special in that people can't make comments about what you post.
They can comment, as you have, to what I say in relation to the topic at hand, but start discussing me and making outright assumptions in the personal, referencing other things not related to the topic in this thread, leads to problems. I am trying to be responsible and not to respond to them. Next time, I will just completely ignore and just focus on the parts that is actually related to the discussion.
You are free to snap into reality anyday now; until then ... and until you show me the "rule" I broke by commenting on your comment ...
Whole thing about being civil, not starting dogpiles, and such.
*post edited to fix quoting function
the 48th regulator