- Reaction score
- 22,358
- Points
- 1,360
…because Canada was a responsible Defence partner then…It seems they made them better than the original and that's why they were desirable. How they got permission from the OEM I don't know.
…because Canada was a responsible Defence partner then…It seems they made them better than the original and that's why they were desirable. How they got permission from the OEM I don't know.
In addition to @Good2Golf ‘s very valid comments, the US had moved past both those platforms and the OEM had no interest in continuing the lines at that point.Canadair sold licensed copies of the F-86 Sabre, some even to the U.S. They also sold the CF-104 and I think there are others I'm forgetting right now.
Canadair Sabre - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
It seems they made them better than the original and that's why they were desirable. How they got permission from the OEM I don't know.
I think Diefenbaker and Mulroney deserve some credit there as well (gotta leave something for the devil)In addition to @Good2Golf ‘s very valid comments, the US had moved past both those platforms and the OEM had no interest in continuing the lines at that point.
Canada of 2022/23 Isn’t the Canada of the 1950 and 60’s. PET and spawn have ensured that.
Mulroney increased industry in this country. We had more auto plants because of him etc. Yes some small branch ops closed but in the long run they would have anyways. The current Gov has seen more industry close than any before it.I think Diefenbaker and Mulroney deserve some credit there as well (gotta leave something for the devil)
Up until about 3 years ago, FMF Cape Breton had a barrel rifling machine, capable of creating naval gun barrels. That capability was divested/scrapped after the Navy realized that we hadn't used it in over 20 years.
Suppose...just suppose....FMF Cape Breton had instead been hired to build a bunch of new 105mm gun barrels?
Now that capability is gone.
It would cost us dearly to get it back in today's world.
Sounds like it would have been perfect for a our coming soon 127mm'sUp until about 3 years ago, FMF Cape Breton had a barrel rifling machine, capable of creating naval gun barrels. That capability was divested/scrapped after the Navy realized that we hadn't used it in over 20 years.
Suppose...just suppose....FMF Cape Breton had instead been hired to build a bunch of new 105mm gun barrels?
Now that capability is gone.
It would cost us dearly to get it back in today's world.
There is a company just outside Edmonton with the old Lathes to make tank barrels. They said they have not missed a beat since WWII.Up until about 3 years ago, FMF Cape Breton had a barrel rifling machine, capable of creating naval gun barrels. That capability was divested/scrapped after the Navy realized that we hadn't used it in over 20 years.
Suppose...just suppose....FMF Cape Breton had instead been hired to build a bunch of new 105mm gun barrels?
Now that capability is gone.
It would cost us dearly to get it back in today's world.
Making a barrel requires a lot more than a lathe. The lathe is the easiest and cheapest of the components needed to make a rifled barrel. It deals with external profile and (depending on setup type) possibly chambering.There is a company just outside Edmonton with the old Lathes to make tank barrels. They said they have not missed a beat since WWII.
Not sure Meaford is templated for 155. Any updates out here?starting to think, there are a lot of canons and canon balls sitting in various museums around Canada.
Time for an inventory check and refurbishment planning, to bring these relics back to service because there seems very little chance of a new 105mm anything being purchased or the ones in system now being refurbished, or updated.
I said a long time ago that the chance of new guns were slim to nothing.
Res Units are already sharing COs, RSMs and guns.
Ontario alone has 6 Res RCA units or did I miss count?
7 Guns in Toronto has the ceremonial role for Toronto ( need for working guns )
30 FD in Ottawa has the ceremonial role for Ottawa ( need for working guns ) but 2 Horse in Petawawa could do it, they have done local communities Remembrance Day Parades with 105mm firing blank rounds
33 Brigade has 3 Units of the RCA.
That is a lot of gun required to operate
Pool what guns are left after the Ceremonial Units are kitted out with guns able to fire blank rounds.
Non Repairable guns are left in the Armouries to be used as training aids and for dry fire training on the parade square or what ever.
Working guns are pooled at Petawawa or Meaford with a service crew to maintain them made of Reg and Res Force members.
Units close to Petawawa or get funding to send troops from outside the area to work with 2Horse to learn how the M777 works and train to be part of the gun crew on their exercises so the troops are trained and deployable if the guns are ever needed to be forward deployed again.
The same can be done at Gagetown, Wainwright, and at Shilo.
Only other way I can see the Res RCA units getting guns is buy used guns from the USA Army as they seem to have more current guns and usually have spares or war stock.
from the above article
"For instance, France has debated replenishing artillery stocks after sending 16 CAESAR howitzer cannons to Ukraine this summer, but it has faced limits on production capacity. “Simply, there are not that many companies in Europe that are capable of doing a gun barrel,” Grand said."
a universal problem it seems
Yes and no. France will never buy something that would require someone else to tool up a factory. They would just pump money into NEXTER instead.Sounds like a business opportunity.
Agreed. But I'd add ammo to the list. Ammo consumption is ALWAYS higher in war than projected. Domestic production capability of your key munitions will keep you in the fight (logistics wins wars).Yes and no. France will never buy something that would require someone else to tool up a factory. They would just pump money into NEXTER instead.
This is going to be one of those times everyone pours money into artillery manufacturing just to see it all dry up in a few years.
I would never invest money for Canada to have a manufacturing capacity for howitzers.
If I was CAF king I would buy something off the self. But invest heavily in the C2, software and IT tech to make it work in the future battle space.
The under reported part of the Ukraine war I feel is massive amount of intelligence, control and targeting on the Ukraine side. The data flow from US, UK and NATO assets and Ukrainian sources has got to be on an unheard of scale. Just seeing the flight tracker of JSTARS, AWACS, P-8, etc give an idea of the size.
oh yes to making the ammo. Of all types.Agreed. But I'd add ammo to the list. Ammo consumption is ALWAYS higher in war than projected. Domestic production capability of your key munitions will keep you in the fight (logistics wins wars).
Many companies have actually put on multiple shifts and doubled if not tripled production. Few are admitting it publicly, as they don’t want a glut in the market and the price driven down for any negotiations.NATO actually needs a plan on munitions and war stocks for every member. Right now no company is stepping up until they have firm contracts which makes sense. Does Canada need its own artillery munitions production? It doesn't seem to make sense that we would need to make our own artillery considering we'd be lucky to buy 150 towed and SP combined