FJAG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 12,942
- Points
- 1,160
I agree in part. It was a fetish when we started down this road. The idea of rapidly deploying quick reaction forces around the world to failed state scenarios were all the rage at the turn of the century when both the Stryker and LAV III came into vogue. It's a bifurcated thing these days.It is not a fetish, it simply is a decent platform we have that is built domestically.
That's kind of the "Johnny has a water pistol. Why can't I?" thing. One needs to have a close look at the tactical needs of the force and go with that.Most of the world runs Wheeled armored vehicles. So why cant we continue to do so?
I'm fully with @KevinB on the issue that heavy armoured forces need tracked IFVs. I formed that opinion on numerous live-fire battle runs with the Germans in Shilo using Leos and Marders. No one can change that belief in me.
On the other hand, I do see the utility of the LAV 6.0. IMHO while I would strongly advocate for tracked IFVs for our Latvia brigade and at least one additional brigade back in Canada I would equally argue for keeping all the LAVs to equip at least two brigades back here in Canada and further that we have at least one light brigade. I think LAV 6.0 is good and you should never throw out good. You should just ensure it is used in a way commensurate with its functions. I even feel that way about the TAPV which has an anticipated life-cycle until appx 2042 or thereabouts.
I'm 100% on board with a tracked IFV but not as a replacement for the LAV 6.0. As an additional system.If we buy a track system then so be it. But we don't so we need to buy systems to adapt to what we have.
I saw the article last fall. Not sure if the new production ever happened. An insitu repair/refit contract for Ukraine was awarded this spring. Regardless, its a range and terminal effects issue of the 105mm projectile for me. Comparable range and effects can be obtained by 120mm mortars which , IMHO, what a battalions mortar pl should be equipped with (preferably mounted on an ACSV chassis.)My understanding is that BAE is restarting production of the M119.
Artillery gets its strength from being able to mass its fire across a broad front. Tat's even more important in an ADO environment. Our artillery should be equipped to do that within a divisional framework.
![Clinking beer mugs :beers: 🍻](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f37b.png)