• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Bob Fowler Kidnapped in Niger (Dec 2008-Apr 2009)

From CanWest News Service:
A second video of two Canadian diplomats and their driver who were kidnapped in Niger in December has been passed to the Canadian and Malian authorities, a Malian source said Thursday.

"A second cassette showing this time not only the two Canadian diplomats Robert Fowler, the UN Secretary General's special envoy to Niger, and Louis Gay but also their driver (Soumana Moukaila) exists," the source said.

The source, who previously revealed the existence of the first video, said he had viewed the tape in which Fowler was seen speaking French.

Moukaila's family had also seen the tape, he added.

Earlier this week the same source said that an Algerian leader of Al-Qaeda's North African branch was holding the two Canadians as well as four European tourists who were kidnapped on the Mali-Niger border last month.

The hostages were in the hands of Moctar Ben Moctar, one of the leaders of al-Qaida in the Islamic Magreb in the southern region....

...and from Reuters:
Al Qaeda's North African arm has demanded 20 of its members be released from detention in Mali and other countries as a condition for releasing six Western hostages, an Algerian newspaper reported on Saturday.

Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb has said it is holding two Canadian diplomats seized in Niger in December, including the U.N. special representative to the West African country, and four European tourists kidnapped nearby in Mali in January.

Algerian newspaper el Khabar quoted unnamed Algerian security officials as saying al Qaeda had demanded 20 Algerian, Mauritanian and Moroccan members detained in Mali and elsewhere be freed as a condition for releasing the Western hostages.

The newspaper said middlemen had met an al Qaeda leader, Yahia Djouadi, at an unspecified location in Mali in an attempt to check the six hostages were all in good health and were all indeed being held by Djouadi's militants, after some media reports that they were being held by a different cell.

Djouadi, sometimes written 'Jawadi', has been identified by U.S. officials as one of the Algerian leaders of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, which was formerly known as the Group for Salafist Preaching and Combat (GSPC)....

And the Google English version (from the Arabic version) in el Khabar - note what appears to be Algerian security forces/commandos being sent to nearby foreign embassies to beef up security:
....Informed source revealed part of the conditions of al-Qaeda in exchange for the release of Western hostages held by the six, where he requested the release of 20 detainees from the nationalities of his followers came from the Algerian, Moroccan and Mauritanian.  According to the same source for the''News''that the Algerian authorities have sent a few days ago, additional security elements from the Special Force of the Directorate of Information and Security, to Mali, Mauritania, Niger, within the action plan to strengthen security in the Sahel countries embassies.   The official declined to a security source, the link between this action and the forthcoming presidential elections.  The elements are known for their high combat efficiency, and trained to respond to the hijacking of aircraft, in the embassies of Algeria states: Mali, Niger, Mauritania and Burkina Faso....
 
... hopefully his flight home won't be routed through Montego Bay...
 
This, from the UN News Centre:
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon today welcomed the release of his Special Envoy for Niger, Robert Fowler, and three others who had been abducted in recent months in West Africa.

Mr. Fowler and his aide Louis Guay, both from Canada, had gone missing while driving near the West African country’s capital Niamey in mid-December 2008.

Mr. Ban expressed gratitude to the authorities in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger for their efforts to secure the safe release of the abductees, according to a statement released by his spokesperson.

“He particularly appreciates the role that Canada has played in ensuring that Mr. Fowler and Mr. Guay would be released unharmed, and is grateful that those efforts have resulted in success,” the spokesperson said.

The Secretary-General reiterated his belief that UN staff members carry out valuable work around the world, “which they should be able to do without fear of harassment or intimidation,” according to the statement.

Scan of statement attached in case links don't work
 
And the speculation begins. At about 1753 today on CTV Newsnet Craig Oliver, who is a self-admitted close friend of Bob Fowler, while qualifying his remarks that no one in Ottawa would confirm it, claimed that JTF2 were all over the area where the release took place.

Mind you, I have it from a very reliable source that 22 SAS have a bulletin board on which they post all the wild press clippings about their exploits, real and imagined. The ski team might have an addition to theirs, if they do the same.
 
Old Sweat, I found this article that 'mentions' but minimizes JTF2 involvment. I suspect they played a much larger role:

Al Qaeda 'Abused' Canadians

http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/622994

Good news that they're safe; hope they'll be okay ...


 
Operation Diplomat
How Canada mounted the most complex rescue mission in its history to free Robert Fowler and Louis Guay from the clutches of al-Qaeda
COLIN FREEZE From Friday's Globe and Mail April 24, 2009 at 2:00 AM EDT
Article Link

A rotating team of three dozen Canadians worked tirelessly in West Africa over the past four months to secure freedom for two Canadian diplomats, sources say. Drawn from the ranks of the foreign service, Mounties, spies and other agencies, they ran the most sophisticated rescue operation Canada has ever known.

Using the wizardry of modern surveillance, calling in favours and exerting pressure on African governments, the team considered every option, up to and including a military raid.

Robert Fowler, a distinguished Canadian civil servant and a former ambassador to the United Nations, and his colleague Louis Guay, also a senior diplomat, were captured on a desert road in eastern Niger just before Christmas. Today, the two men are expected to fly out of Bamako, Mali, on their way to be reunited with their families.

While the full story of the mission may never be known, it's clear the stakes for the rescue were high.

To add to the complexities, The Globe and Mail understands, there was suspicion that people in Niger had tipped a criminal gang to the Canadians' travel plans. When the UN jeep was stopped at gunpoint, the kidnappers knew they had prized assets.

The hostages were “traded up” at least twice, sources say, before ending up in the hands of Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, or AQIM, a group that emerged from the civil war in Algeria. The ransom demand that came to Prime Minister Stephen Harper's attention included the freeing of AQIM members imprisoned in neighbouring Mauritania.

“The longer it went on, the more it seemed likely that there might be a positive resolution, because clearly they had value to whoever was holding them. Whether it was political or financial, they had value,” said Gerald Ohlsen, a retired senior diplomat and long-time colleague of the captured men. “There were clearly an awful lot of people involved in the negotiations.”

Geography, intergovernmental relations and quality of intelligence all factor into decisions made by Ottawa in terms of what can be done. Each kidnapping is different and officials stress that the fact that the targets were two former ranking diplomats was not material to the scale of the response.

The first challenge for Canada was found in the vehicles carrying the hostages. Cellphones the Canadians had been carrying were left behind, sources say, indicating the kidnappers were aware signals intelligence could be used to triangulate a phone position.

The Canadian military, Mounties and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service were mobilized. A rich contributor to the Malian infrastructure over the years, Canada has forged close relations with the government. This gave the rescue team a considerable advantage, allowing for relatively easy transfer of Canadians in and out of the sovereign country.
More on link
 
More grist for the mill, if you're inclined to believe AQ in the the Islamic Maghreb's latest statement (original in Arabic here, Google English translation here, .zip file attached to this post of .pdf Arabic poster if you don't want to link to a terrorist web page).
.... We declare in this statement of the public opinion that was only the praise of God and the release of four prisoners of our fighters in exchange for the release of four of the abductees to the organization, namely: Canadians (Robert Fuller and Lewis Guy), German (marianne petzold), and Swiss (gabriella burco greiner) ....

Scarier part, though, for those still held....
.... Therefore we call on Britain's release of Sheikh Abu Qatada the Palestinian Madhloum conservation of him, compared to its national release of the British and Nmhlha period of twenty days from the issuance of this statement, and the end of the period, the British hostage executed Mujahideen did not find that in response to the demand, due notice ....
 
This from CanWest News Service:
.... Neither has spoken publicly of their ordeal, but, now that they are back and appear to be at least physically well, though slimmer, questions are being asked about the diplomatic cost to Canada.

An early shot across the bow came Wednesday from Algeria, which says it will assess the implications of the reported release from a Malian jail of four members of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), a faction of which held the Canadians.
(....)
AQIM announced in a statement Sunday that Fowler, Guay and two women it had been holding among a group of four European hostages were released in exchange for four of its "mujahedeen" fighters. Regional sources with security service contacts confirmed the release.

"There is intense co-operation between all the states in this region, including concerning fighting (against) the terrorists," Khaled Guettiche, deputy director of media relations of Algeria's Foreign Ministry said from Algiers.

"But we are going to confirm this information, and then we are going to study what we can say."

The "prisoner exchange" marks the first time AQIM has succeeded having its demand met for its militants to be freed after grabbing Western hostages on two previous occasions since 2003, one regional analyst said ....
More on link
 
Part one airing tonight and part two airing Wednesday night on The National:  Living with al-Qaeda: the Robert Fowler Story

http://www.cbc.ca/national/blog/video/internationalus/living_with_alqaeda_the_robert_1.html



Kidnapping Stemmed From Inside Leak, Diplomat Tells CBC

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Qaeda+kidnapping+stemmed+from+inside+leak+diplomat/1972236/story.html

(Posted in accordance with the Fair Dealing provision (29) of the Copyright Act.)
Ottawa Citizen: September 8, 2009

A Canadian diplomat who was kidnapped and held captive for four months in Niger has told the CBC he believes his al-Qaida captors were tipped off prior to his abduction.


In a CBC interview, Fowler said the heavily armed captors seemed "unsurprised" when he made them aware of his identity and position with the United Nations. "I know somebody shopped me," Fowler said in the CBC interview. A spokesman for the UN bristled Tuesday at the suggestion one of its operatives tipped the kidnappers to the Fowler party's itinerary, and effectively called on its former Niger envoy to produce any evidence suggesting otherwise.


"We have no information to indicate a leak from our side," said Farhan Haq, spokesman for the UN in New York. "Obviously, any such indication would be of serious concern. If anyone has any information, we would appreciate that they share it with us, so that we can look into it thoroughly."


Fowler was a UN special envoy to Niger on Dec. 14, 2008, when the vehicle he and another Canadian UN diplomat, Louis Guay, were travelling in was approached by a group of militants. With their personal effects left behind in their abandoned vehicle, Fowler and Guay were held for 130 days and were eventually released on April 22. He told the CBC that he marked each day of captivity with a thorn scratch on his belt. Fowler, who was part of a group trying to iron out a battle over resources between local government and rebel groups by trying to establish an agreement over royalties, told CBC that there was a lot of opposition to his mission. Fowler was on the job for five months before the kidnapping took place.


He told CBC that during his second trip as special envoy the Niger government seemed "offended" that the UN would dispatch an envoy to the area. Speculation soon arose while he was still in captivity that there may have been government involvement. The area where Fowler's group — which was not travelling with a security detail — was kidnapped was considered safe by UN standards, he said, telling the CBC that it was a common area for diplomats to hold picnics.​
 
This, from the Globe & Mail:
Canada wants to bring the al-Qaeda militants accused of kidnapping Robert Fowler and Louis Guay out of Africa and into Canadian courts.

The test case would showcase the long arm of Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act.

RCMP officers were among dozens of federal agents sent to Africa last spring in hopes of facilitating a rescue of the two Canadian hostages, and still hope to lay charges over the abduction of the Canadian diplomat and his aide.

With their sudden and unexpected release, Canada is now moving into a new phase with reports Ottawa is hoping to charge Mokhtar Belmokhtar, a leader of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, and militants associated with him with kidnapping and being members of a terrorist organization ....
 
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20091010/qaeda_report_091010/20091010?hub=Canada

Al Qaeda members freed in return for diplomats: report
By: The Canadian Press
Sat. Oct. 10 2009

TORONTO — Four al Qaeda members, including a bomb-maker, were released from prison in the African country of Mali in exchange for the freedom of two Canadian diplomats this spring, a newspaper reported Saturday.

The diplomats, Robert Fowler and Louis Guay, were kidnapped in Niger last December and held for more than four months by an al Qaeda offshoot, known al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb or AQIM.

In a report from Mali, the Globe and Mail said the prisoner release was confirmed by government sources and by a local intermediary involved in negotiations to free the diplomats.

It also said Ottawa is maintaining that it played no part in the release of the al Qaeda members.

The newspaper said the released prisoners were Mauritanian members of AQIM. It added that one of them, known as Sidi, was a bomb-maker who was involved in an explosion in Mali last year.

Fowler, the United Nations special envoy to Niger, and his aide Guay were taken at gunpoint Dec. 14 while driving on a main road about 40 kilometres northwest of the capital, Niamey.

Fowler was on a mission to mediate between the Niger government and a rebel movement, fighting over resource royalties.

Following the kidnapping, the Niger government appeared unco-operative but denied any involvement. The diplomats were ultimately freed in Mali on April 21.

Fowler was Canada's longest-serving ambassador to the UN, holding the post from 1995 to 2000.

He was ambassador to Italy for six years after that and is considered an expert on Africa.
 
.... here:
Four terrorists, including a bomb-maker, were released from prison in the African nation of Mali in exchange for the freedom this year of Canadian diplomats Robert Fowler and Louis Guay, high-ranking government sources in Mali have confirmed.

The released prisoners were members of al-Qaeda’s increasingly powerful branch in the Sahara region of northern and western Africa. Two of them had been arrested in the northern Mali desert town of Gao last year after an accidental explosion while they were manufacturing a bomb, the sources say.

The prisoner release, which the Canadian government maintains it played no part in, was confirmed by government sources in Mali and by a local intermediary who was intimately involved in negotiations to free the Canadian hostages from the Sahara terrorist group, known as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). The group, formed in 2006 after a merger between al-Qaeda and an Algerian-based terrorist group, seeks to expel Westerners and set up an Islamic theocracy in Africa.

Several sources said three of the released prisoners were Mauritanian members of AQIM, which has members from across West Africa and North Africa. One of the prisoners, known as Sidi, was a “chemist,” a bomb-maker, who was involved in last year’s explosion. A second prisoner, known as Tayoub, was a logistics expert who was caught after the same explosion.

A fourth prisoner, Mohamed, was in the process of being released, but was killed in a car accident during the transfer.

In addition to the prisoner release, Malian sources support earlier reports that several million dollars in cash was given to the kidnappers, although the exact origins of the money remain unclear ....

More on link
 
Here, reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act from today’s Globe and Mail is more about how Mr. Fowler’s release was effected:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/the-shadowy-negotiator-who-freed-fowler-and-guay/article1320522/
The shadowy negotiator who freed Fowler and Guay
He’s Mali’s go-to man for haggling with terrorists and he brokered the deal that set two Canadians free

Geoffrey York

Bamako, Mali

Sunday, Oct. 11, 2009 10:23PM EDT

When the kidnappers freed Robert Fowler and Louis Guay after a gruelling 130 days of captivity this spring, Prime Minister Stephen Harper expressed his gratitude to a long list of people: presidents, diplomats, allies, even the United Nations.

But he omitted any mention of the most important man of all: the mysterious negotiator from the wilds of the Sahara who brokered the deal that bought the freedom of the Canadian hostages from their al-Qaeda abductors.

It was a crucial omission, and it revealed the distrust and controversy that still swirls around the shadowy negotiator. Did he walk away with some of the money himself? Is he playing both sides? Is he a little too close to the terrorists with whom he bargains?

The questions are unanswered. But every insider admits that the negotiator, Baba Ould Sheik, was the essential man for the job. Since his first hostage deal in 2003, he has been the region's go-to man, the wheeler-dealer with the connections and toughness to haggle with heavily armed terrorists in the sand dunes of the Sahara.

Baba_Ould_Sheik_273748gm-a.jpg

Baba Ould Sheik, the shadowy negotiator of the deal that bought the freedom of Robert Fowler and Louis Guay from the hands of al-Qaeda.
Serge Daniel for The Globe and Mail


Until now, he has never spoken publicly of his pivotal role in freeing Mr. Fowler and Mr. Guay. He is a man who has always preferred the shadows. But now, in an interview with The Globe and Mail, he describes how he brokered the deal, how he communicated with to the terrorists, how he shared his carpet in the desert with Mr. Fowler, and how he drove through a sandstorm to get the Canadians back to safety.

He also says that he was never thanked by Canada for his three months of work to free the Canadians, and was never compensated for his substantial expenses. Yet he acknowledges that even his own colleagues assume that he was paid – and are accusing him of failing to share the money.

Canadian diplomats Robert Fowler, right, UN special envoy to Niger, and his assistant Louis Guay are pictured as they meet with Mali President Amadou Toumani (out of camera range) after they were released along with two European tourists by al-Qaeda-linked captors after months as hostages, in Bamako on April 23, 2009.

Mr. Ould Sheik, who wears a white robe and a brown turban, speaks in a polite matter-of-fact voice as he relates his story. He is a wealthy businessman and Arab community leader from northern Mali whose only official title is mayor of Tarkint, a district in the Sahara. But in elite circles in Mali, he is famed for his ability to negotiate with terrorists, a role he has been playing for the past six years, beginning with helping to free 14 European hostages in Mali in 2003.

After the two Canadian diplomats were kidnapped in Niger last December, it quickly became clear that they had been smuggled across the border into Mali's northern deserts. Mali's President, Amadou Toumani Touré, repeatedly asked Mr. Ould Sheik to help negotiate with the kidnappers. He says he refused twice, then finally agreed after the third request, which came in January.

Within the Malian government, the mood shifted when Mr. Ould Sheik agreed to take the assignment. “If Baba Ould Sheik is involved, there will be a happy ending,” one government official said. “He is a very efficient man.”

Mr. Ould Sheik formed a delegation of eight respected community leaders to meet the kidnappers. As time went on and the work became tougher in the Sahara's fierce heat and wind, only two or four of them would do the negotiating, always led by Mr. Ould Sheik.

It was difficult for him to contact the terrorists, who never kept the same satellite phone number for more than a couple of days. Sometimes he had to drive for days through the desert, then wait at a designated location for three or four days until someone came to him with a phone number for him to call, and then he would be told of another meeting point. Sometimes he had to drive nearly to the Algerian border, a distance of some 700 kilometres through the Sahara from his base in the northern town of Gao.

Negotiating with the radical kidnappers was equally hard. “Sometimes I had to explain to them that what they wanted was not possible,” he said. “Sometimes I had to beg them to accept what we were offering.”

Yet it is clear that Mr. Ould Sheik has a good relationship with the terrorists. He spoke often to their Algerian leader, Mokhtar Belmokhtar, whom he defends as “not a bad man.”

He said he carried an “Ordre de Mission” to prove that he was representing Mali's President in the negotiations, and the kidnappers respected him. “These people know that I won't lie to them,” he said.

Back in Mali's capital, Bamako, he held many meetings with Canadian diplomats and other officials. At their request, he brought emergency supplies to the hostages, including medicine and clothes, he said.

In the beginning, he said, the kidnappers were interested mostly in money – lots of it. But later they became obsessed with seeking the freedom of several al-Qaeda members who had been arrested and jailed in Mali. “It would have been a stain on their names if these men were imprisoned,” he said. “It's okay for them to die in battle, but not to be imprisoned.”

Mr. Ould Sheik brought back at least two videos from the kidnappers to prove that the Canadian hostages were still alive. The first video was made just five days after the Canadians were captured.

In the second video – made on Feb. 3, about seven weeks after the kidnapping, and recently viewed by The Globe and Mail – the two Canadian diplomats sit on the floor of a tent while four kidnappers stand behind them, holding machine guns and masking their faces with black turbans. Also on the tent floor is their United Nations driver from Niger, who was later released. Behind the kidnappers is an Islamic jihad banner, in black and white, proclaiming “God is Great” in Arabic.

In the video, Mr. Fowler and Mr. Guay speak in French, explaining that they have been captured by the terrorist group known as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). They thank their families, and Mr. Guay expresses regret at missing the birthdays of his children, while Mr. Fowler praises his “magnificent” family.

“I regret that I caused them such pain, and I am eager to see them very soon,” he says. “We live in the desert, the conditions are not easy, but we are treated very well.”

One of the masked kidnappers, standing behind Mr. Fowler, holds a sword in his hands. But their attempt to appear menacing is undercut when a bandolier of bullets slips off the shoulder of one kidnapper in the middle of the video, tumbling to the floor with an embarrassing clatter.

In a third video, some weeks later, the atmosphere is much more terrifying. The Canadians are blindfolded, with their hands behind their backs, while the kidnappers recite a long ultimatum, threatening to execute their captives. Mr. Fowler later said he wasn't sure if he would live or die.

Mr. Ould Sheik was impressed by Mr. Fowler's courage as the death threat was made, and he said the kidnappers were impressed that he did not cry or show emotion. “He faced this terrible time as a real man. Even they recognized that this was a real man.”

Mr. Ould Sheik confirmed Mr. Fowler's own assessment that about 100 AQIM fighters were involved in the two terrorist cells that captured the two Canadian diplomats and four European tourists in December and January. The leaders were Algerian, and their food and vehicles came from Algeria, but their rank-and-file members included scores of recruits from Senegal, Ghana, Nigeria, Mauritania and Benin, he said.

Mr. Ould Sheik was reluctant to talk about specific details of the negotiations or say much about the involvement of Canadian officials. Several Mali government sources have confirmed that the final deal with the kidnappers, negotiated in mid-April, included the release of three AQIM members from Malian prisons, along with a cash payment of several million dollars.

Also freed at the same time as the Canadians were two women tourists from Germany and Switzerland who had been kidnapped in January. But for AQIM, it was clear that Mr. Fowler and Mr. Guay were the most valuable prize. The two women were in poor health, and the kidnappers feared that they might die if they were not released, Mr. Ould Sheik said.

After the Canadians were freed about April 19, they had to wait in the desert for the arrival of the two Europeans, who were held by a different AQIM cell. Then the freed hostages and the negotiators, driving together in two pick-up trucks, embarked on the 700-kilometre journey through the Sahara to the northern town of Gao. There were no roads, just desert trails or wide-open sand. When they slept at night on the desert sand, Mr. Ould Sheik said, he shared his carpet with Mr. Fowler.

At one point, as they drove through the desert, a wind blew up and their vehicles were swallowed in a sandstorm. The Canadians were afraid that they would be lost.

“Even if you know the desert, there is always the wind,” the negotiator said. “But when the wind stopped, I knew exactly where we were.”

Mr. Ould Sheik insisted that he accepted the three-month hostage assignment because of his sense of duty to the President. He denies receiving any profits from the ransom. But several Malian officials laughed when told of his claim. There are even rumours that he might be arrested or snatched by U.S. special forces in their attempts to locate the AQIM cells.

“Since 2003, Baba Ould Sheik has been at the centre of all hostage releases in Mali,” said Serge Daniel, a journalist in Bamako who is writing a book on the hostage dramas. “In every case, there is money involved.”

Mr. Ould Sheik said the Canadian diplomats promised to give him a financial payment as a “gesture” for his expenses and his time. “They promised me many things, but to this day, I don't even have a piece of paper from Canada to thank me,” he said.

“I don't regret that I fought for Fowler's liberation, but I'm not happy with Canada. I thought they would at least give me a letter of thanks. The Canadians said that since I had used many people in the negotiations, and many vehicles, there would be a gesture for everyone. But it never came, and this caused a conflict among us. Everyone understood that Mali is poor, but we thought that Canada would help us.”

Even today, he said, his fellow negotiators are upset with him. “They think I was given something and didn't give it to them.”


It’s hard to know what to make of sorts of these fellows except they are, at least they were, ubiquitous in North Africa and the Middle East – they are ”locals” who have ”connections” with those who do their ”business” on the fringes of society and outside of society’s norms. Baba Ould Sheik was paid, that ought to be enough.

 
Here, reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act from today’s Globe and Mail is more on al Qaeda in Maghreb:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/diplomat-robert-fowlers-kidnapper-has-powerful-terrorist-links/article1322382/
Diplomat Robert Fowler's kidnapper has powerful terrorist links
Ten months after the kidnapping, there are reports that Algeria is offering Mokhtar Belmokhtar an amnesty

Geoffrey York

Timbuktu, Mali

Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2009

On the northern edge of Timbuktu, the ancient mud buildings disappear and there is nothing but endless desert, stretching for nearly 1,000 kilometres to the border of Algeria and beyond.

This forbidding landscape, populated only by a few bands of nomads and smugglers, is the stronghold of Mokhtar Belmokhtar, the elusive commander of the terrorist cell that kidnapped two Canadian diplomats and held them hostage in the Sahara for more than four months.

The 37-year-old Algerian-born radical, trained in Afghanistan and still closely linked with al-Qaeda, has a fearsome reputation in the Algerian media. His legend is fuelled by nicknames such as “The Uncatchable” and “The Emir of the Masked Battalion.”

fowler1003_276621gm-a.jpg

This image of Mokhtar Belmokhtar was circulated by Interpol in 2002
The Globe and Mail


A more accurate portrait would begin with another nickname, given to him because of his lucrative cigarette-smuggling activities: “Mr. Marlboro.”

His true value to the Sahara terrorists is his ability to deliver money and weapons to his allies in Algeria and Mauritania, known as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). Rather than leading his men on dangerous missions or in battle, he prefers to lead from behind, relying on support networks in northern Mali that evolved from his trafficking of drugs, stolen cars, cigarettes and hostages.

By marrying at least four wives from the desert communities of northern Mali, including the famed blue-robed Tuareg nomads, Mr. Belmokhtar has entrenched himself in the Sahara region, giving him the protection he needs to survive.

“Unlike some of the other AQIM leaders, literally through marriage he has found his way into the social fabric of Mali and Mauritania,” said Peter Pham, a U.S.-based expert on terrorism in Africa.

Crucially, Mr. Belmokhtar is believed to have forged close links with senior government officials in northern Mali, allowing him to operate freely in the Sahara in exchange for refraining from attacks on Malian targets. The arrangement created a safe haven that has proven useful to his allies in their kidnap-for-ransom operations over the past six years.

When Canadian diplomats Robert Fowler and Louis Guay were kidnapped in Niger last December, they were promptly whisked across the border to Mali, where the hostage-takers clearly felt much safer. Similarly, two Austrian tourists kidnapped in Tunisia were taken to Mali and held there until their release. In both cases, Mr. Belmokhtar was the key figure in negotiating the final ransom. The revenue from the kidnappings, believed to be many millions of dollars, added to the financial wealth of “Mr. Marlboro.”

Among the people of the Sahara, Mr. Belmokhtar is known more as a trader than a terrorist – someone with whom they can do business. “He is not a bad man,” said Baba Ould Sheik, an Arab leader from northern Mali who negotiated with Mr. Belmokhtar to obtain the release of the Canadians. “He's simple. He's not nasty. It's possible to talk to him.”

Canadian taxpayers have spent millions in a clandestine operation initially aimed at freeing Mr. Fowler and Mr. Guay from Mr. Belmokhtar, and which is now focused on bringing him to justice. Dozens of federal diplomats, spies and police travelled to West Africa last spring in hopes of rescuing the two Canadians, who were released in April in exchange for four AQIM members imprisoned in Mali. The mission continues today, with the RCMP still hoping to lay charges against Mr. Belmokhtar and his accomplices.

Born in central Algeria in 1972, Mr. Belmokhtar was a teenager when he became obsessed with the Islamic militants who were fighting against Soviet troops in Afghanistan in the late 1980s. By 1991, at the age of 19, he was travelling to Afghanistan to train with the Islamic fighters. He says he attended a notorious al-Qaeda training camp in Jalalabad and fought in battles across Afghanistan.

Returning to Algeria in 1993, he joined the Islamic extremists who were battling Algeria's military regime. He became the leader of the “southern zone” of the insurgency, obtaining weapons and supplies through smuggling networks in the Sahara, although he also occasionally led attacks against Algerian and Mauritanian security forces.

Mr. Belmokhtar, also known as “The One-Eyed” because he is blind in one eye, was a key intermediary between the Algerian radicals and the leaders of al-Qaeda. By 2006, his group had merged with al-Qaeda and rebranded itself as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, tapping into the global Islamist ideology.

His trafficking activities, meanwhile, remained a major source of arms and equipment for the Algerian terrorists. “His ability to supply jihadi elements in northern Algeria reliably has been critical to the ability for these groups to sustain their activities,” wrote Andrew Black, a U.S.-based risk management consultant, in an analysis for the Jamestown Foundation.

Ten months after the kidnapping of Mr. Fowler and Mr. Guay, there is no sign that the RCMP has moved closer to its goal of prosecuting Mr. Belmokhtar. Instead, there are persistent reports from Algiers that the Algerian authorities are giving him a new option: an amnesty agreement that might put him beyond the reach of Canadian prosecution forever. “If it's up to him, he might accept the amnesty,” Mr. Ould Sheik said.


I wish to reiterate my objection, as a matter of practicality, to spending huge sums of money on bringing Belmokhtar to justice. There is nothing to be gained by prosecuting him in any open court. The better options are:

• Capture him and milk him for information and then use that information to steal al Qaeda’s money (and the money of other, similar groups) and to assassinate al Qaeda’s members (and the members of other, similar groups; or

• Kill him – extra legally – pour encourager les autres.

This is work for a secret intelligence operations service, not for law enforcement.
 
E.R. Campbell said:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/the-shadowy-negotiator-who-freed-fowler-and-guay/article1320522/

It’s hard to know what to make of sorts of these fellows except they are, at least they were, ubiquitous in North Africa and the Middle East – they are ”locals” who have ”connections” with those who do their ”business” on the fringes of society and outside of society’s norms. Baba Ould Sheik was paid, that ought to be enough.

And that is one of the shortcomings with the manner in which Canadian officials conduct business in the third world.

While it can be taken as a given that (Ali) Baba (and his forty thieves) 'wet his beak' somewhere along the line from the ransom paid, it is also very conceiveable that he didn't receive a "gesture" from the Canadian government.  It is understandable why the Canadian government wants to distance itself from the payment of the ransom and release of prisoners in exchange for Fowler and Guay, but "losing face" should not be associated solely with oriental business practices.  Showing proper "respect" is equally important when doing business in Africa (as well as in the rest of the world).

You may know for a fact that an intermediary will receive a commission from the other party in a transaction; you may be certain that he will skim off the top anytime cash changes hands; however, you should not assume that any bribes you paid are being divided among underlings or other parties (except maybe a taste to the one who suggested it).  If you sit at the table and are involved in ordering the meal then you have to pay a "pourboire" to the one who brings it.  Though (if judged by some government scandals) it may seem easy to (temporarily) hide under the table payments, Canadian government rules do not really condone "baksheesh" and our representatives abroad are not noted for being free and easy with cash.

Mali will probably receive some future "official" consideration for their assistance in this matter, the government officials involved will take their usual cut, though that is unlikely to include anything for Baba Ould Sheik. The article noted that he has been the negotiator of choice for most hostage takings for several years.  While he has mostly remained in the shadows till now, previous hostage takings in the region have not involved as high a profile individual as Fowler.  Maybe, like most "professionals", Baba just wants recognition for his skill (of course, he probably wants more money too, like most professionals).  In the custom of that region, if Canadian officials had any direct contact with him and had even "suggested" that his expenses would be taken care of, then he would be correct in his assumption that he should receive that "respect" direct from Canada.
 
Your points are very well taken. I was thinking of the political embarrassment in Canada when, inevitably, any "thanks" we might offer would become public.
 
E.R. Campbell said:
I wish to reiterate my objection, as a matter of practicality, to spending huge sums of money on bringing Belmokhtar to justice. There is nothing to be gained by prosecuting him in any open court. The better options are:

• Capture him and milk him for information and then use that information to steal al Qaeda’s money (and the money of other, similar groups) and to assassinate al Qaeda’s members (and the members of other, similar groups; or

• Kill him – extra legally – pour encourager les autres.

This is work for a secret intelligence operations service, not for law enforcement.

Actually we have a whole list of Canadian gang figures who need this kind of justice.  If not, in a few years, you will be able to substitute Canada for Africa in all these newspaper clippings......
 
E.R. Campbell said:
Your points are very well taken. I was thinking of the political embarrassment in Canada when, inevitably, any "thanks" we might offer would become public.

Seen.

And that is why many representatives in Africa use "consultants".  It is taken as a matter of fact that the consultant's "fee" includes any "minor expenses" that he may be required to distribute.  The contract does not usually include any wording that lists what (or what not) may be "expenses"; such clauses generally being able to be used as evidence should such practices be contrary to the legislation of a representative's (or consultant's) country.  Also, it is assumed that if a party to a negotiation directly mentions to another individual "reimbursement of expenses", then the one mentioning it becomes responsible for those costs, not the consultant; they are usually very knowledgeable about the local rates for bribes tariffs, they don't want the naive and stupid cutting into their profit margin. Though there is much of a "wink, wink, nudge, nudge" to this cut-out process, that's how it works.
 
Back
Top