Lone Wolf AT said:
Besides doing 19 push ups vice 18 doesn't make one a better soldier over the other.
I agree; it means that 1 of 2 was
barely capable of meeting the
minimum standard and that the other 1 of 2 couldn't even do that.
As already said, the PT test does nothing towards towards determining who will make a "good" soldier or not, but it does seem to show who, at least, had an ounce of personal drive in their body to 'try' to meet the minimum fitness standard for the CF - knowing full well that they: 1) applied to join the military; 2) may be going combat arms, (!! <--- BIG hint that one needs to be in shape!!); 3) will be reporting for various courses; and 4)
will be tested to ensure that they can meet that bare minimum "known" standard at the outset of their career. Most of them have had "months", at the minimum, to prepare for this and get themselves into shapr after applying to the CF. Apparently, some don't have enough drive to do even that.
This testing isn't a surprise to them and they are well aware of what they need to achieve. There has to be a minimum standard set somewhere along the line and this is currently where it's at.
At the end of the day, I'll take the guy who at least made effort to attain the minimum fitness result over the one who didn't because "good" soldiers also need to exhibit personal drive, determination, an ability to overcome difficulties, personal responsibility and accountability, and an ability to work on their own in an effort to achieve results. One of them managed to that - and the other did not despite having months to prep. Désolé, I hope the door doesn't hit the others' ass on the way out because his "
failure" demonstrates many more defecient areas than "just" fitness.