• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Attempted assassination of Donald Trump 13 July 2024

When gangs and common thugs arm themselves with automatic weapons ILLEGALLY obtained, body armor, and hire people to train them how are the police supposed to react? By asking them nicely to turn in their illegal weapons?

When the judicial system is serious about incarcerating those who use ILLEGAL firearms to commit crimes then MAYBE we can talk about "militarization" of the police.
 
Any thoughts on Sen. Hawley's allegations that a number of the USSS agents protecting Trump were not actual USSS agents? (As fascinating as the off topic stuff about police kit is....)
That’s not what he’s alleging. He’s alleging that some of the police there were not USSS, but instead were Homeland Security Investigations officers drawn from field offices to bolster site security.

No shit.

Hawley’s basically just exposing his ignorance about how protective security at large events happens. There’s a very finite number of officers specifically trained in close protections, and almost universally all that’s needed at such events is a lot of police presence. Investigative officers will get told to throw a suit and their gun on and provide site security. That’s utterly normal. In the various videos of things going sideways in Butler you see a number of them, including several who help escort Trump from the dais to his truck, and some of whom get in a support vehicle to help provide security when he arrived at hospital.

The president himself could be at an event with his full USSS security package, and outside of his immediate vicinity there would be various federal officers and local police all over the site who aren’t close protection trained and are relying on their normal training to be vigilant and engage threats. Since most federal agents aren’t out on the road dealing with dangerous situations very much, that can look fairly rough. Par for the course though.
 
That’s not what he’s alleging. He’s alleging that some of the police there were not USSS, but instead were Homeland Security Investigations officers drawn from field offices to bolster site security.

No shit.

Hawley’s basically just exposing his ignorance about how protective security at large events happens. There’s a very finite number of officers specifically trained in close protections, and almost universally all that’s needed at such events is a lot of police presence. Investigative officers will get told to throw a suit and their gun on and provide site security. That’s utterly normal. In the various videos of things going sideways in Butler you see a number of them, including several who help escort Trump from the dais to his truck, and some of whom get in a support vehicle to help provide security when he arrived at hospital.

The president himself could be at an event with his full USSS security package, and outside of his immediate vicinity there would be various federal officers and local police all over the site who aren’t close protection trained and are relying on their normal training to be vigilant and engage threats. Since most federal agents aren’t out on the road dealing with dangerous situations very much, that can look fairly rough. Par for the course though.
100%
 
Any thoughts on Sen. Hawley's allegations that a number of the USSS agents protecting Trump were not actual USSS agents? (As fascinating as the off topic stuff about police kit is....)

If Hawley said the sky was blue, I’d look outside. He is well known for throwing “boob bait for the bubbas” to get the outrage bus going. Given is extremely elite education, he knows better. He is not a good-faith actor.
 
Back
Top