Staff Weenie
Full Member
- Reaction score
- 157
- Points
- 630
While I may be naive on this issue - I've never fully understood the rationale of the US embargo. I believe that all people in the world suffer from some form of greed/jealousy - not necessarily in a bad way - they just 'want things'. In essence, they want what their perceived neighbour has.
For Cubans - this means an envy for things taken for granted by most North Americans - two cars in the driveway, a fridge full of food, etc. Let's admit it, we're pretty much at the apex of the pyramid for individual material wealth in the world.
By placing an embargo on Cuba, the US sets themselves up as the proverbial bad-guy. They are blocking the flow of these goods into Cuba, and Castro becomes their protector, the guy who fought to apportion out equally what meagre resources were left to the benefit of all. And, when you control all the media, it's easy to reinforce that impression.
Had the US taken the opposite approach, and tried to flood their market with material goods and rampant consumerism, then Castro would have been the sticking point, and his people would have seen that he was the one preventing them from getting what they want, and their anger would turn on him.
Probably an oversimplification, I know, but it's something plausible.
For Cubans - this means an envy for things taken for granted by most North Americans - two cars in the driveway, a fridge full of food, etc. Let's admit it, we're pretty much at the apex of the pyramid for individual material wealth in the world.
By placing an embargo on Cuba, the US sets themselves up as the proverbial bad-guy. They are blocking the flow of these goods into Cuba, and Castro becomes their protector, the guy who fought to apportion out equally what meagre resources were left to the benefit of all. And, when you control all the media, it's easy to reinforce that impression.
Had the US taken the opposite approach, and tried to flood their market with material goods and rampant consumerism, then Castro would have been the sticking point, and his people would have seen that he was the one preventing them from getting what they want, and their anger would turn on him.
Probably an oversimplification, I know, but it's something plausible.