Good day readers,
First post. While I hope and trust that I have done so properly, – I am happy to be corrected if I have not. There are a few threads that this could be applicable for, but I think this one is not a bad destination.
Usually it’s best to get to the point. But I believe that in this case, the responses I (hopefully) receive will be better guided if I provide a little background. I’m sure I’m not a unique case, but the queries over the choices I will confront if my CF DEO application is successful relate to my background – so please allow me to expand on that a little.
The basics: 38 years old, male, single, dual Canadian/British citizen (born and resident until 1998 in Canada - the latter nationality comes through my dad). Functionally bilingual (I can speak and read French quite well, but my writing skills are usually only good for emails, not memos) – smattering of other languages from time abroad, physical aspects - . 6,5 ft, 200 pounds, good health – relatively fit for my age and working towards being in appropriate shape for BOTP should my application be successful.
Education: MA International Affairs full scholarship, eleven different scholarships including national awards - research assistantships at CIC and NDHQ, House of Commons when I was in graduate school.
I have an application for DEO currently being processed, all my paperwork is in, so I'm currently waiting out the security check (the long one...). It’s been ten years now that I have been abroad working for the United Nations in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. I’m the Number Two in our Office currently, my work in my career has mainly involved running teams of specialists in countries in conflict (I'm basically a generalist, the proverbial “Jack of all Trades, Master of None” – I deal with the political, security and administrative aspects of the mission so the specialists can concentrate on doing what it is they are supposed to be doing). It’s been a great career, allowed me to see and experience many different cultures – I’ve being doing what I loved and am fully aware of my good fortune in life thus far.
I won’t claim that the physical aspects of my work are tough by CF standards – they’re not – but the nature of my work is less separated from the military than are other trades – because I work in the same sort of environment – countries like Iraq and Somalia. Being in the field, I have to deal with the bureaucrats, the “ministers” of whatever transitional government happens to be in place, the other agency representatives and the baddies – to go where the guns are and talk to the people with guns To deal with the usual stress that comes from managing multi-million dollar budgets and people from all sorts of cultures to mold them into teams to reach the desired results - and then every two years or so I uproot my whole life and go somewhere else and start the entire process over somewhere else. And all that is the stuff I love. I enjoy responsibility, I enjoy forging teams and I enjoy leading those teams and seeing to their security. Most of my subordinates are much older than me. But I believe that transparency and consistency in decision-making, respect for the individual and personal integrity iare key – no matter what culture people are from, they recognize and respond to these elements.
But a couple years ago that little voice that we all carry with us began to voice his discomfort with where things were heading. The more I stay in, the more I’m getting away from the above aspects (more hands on) to work with other managers from other agencies on policy, etc. And unfortunately, although I maintain my respect for the principles and ideals of the UN, this is in far too many instances not a system where the good rise to the top. Because it’s so hard to be suspended (you practically have to kill a colleague with an axe and be unlucky enough that someone was filming you in the act) – “problems” are transferred with promotion. So, you end up in meetings and on missions to deal with ever-more important subject with ever-more incompetent people who, not being confident in their own abilities, substitute instead petty-politics for logic/reason and fall all over each other trying to all say something more important than the previous speaker – while the few competent people in the room roll their eyes and plan for a smaller meeting later where they will sort the issue out in a discreet and quiet way. I haven’t lost my faith per se, but I may have lost my place.
So, early last year while I was pondering what to do about all this, I ran into a couple ex-CF officers working with the UN. They being brethren Bluenosers and the venue a party, we got into a good chat about life, I voiced my concerns and they both asked whether or not I had considered the Forces.
This suggestion didn’t take very long to start to work its way into my system. I’ve worked a lot with the military in my career and have met and been friends with some fine individuals from the CF so it’s not completely unfamiliar territory to me. And like the UN (or what the UN represents to me anyway) – it’s a hell of a lot more than a trade, it’s a calling, a cause. Having been abroad for so long, I know very well what Canada means to me – because I see how people react to me as a Canadian. An institution that protects and represents to the high standard the same ideals and values which most of the people I meet in my travels would love to live under is an institution I want to be part of. And concretely, if I do want to continue, challenge and better both my leadership and personal limits, well there’s not really a better place, is there?
Ok, apologies all for taking up your time, now we’re getting to the gist of this.
I put down three preferences as DEO applicant – Infantry, Intelligence, and Armor since they asked for three. But really, it’s between the first two. I ran into a Air Force Captain at the CFRC whom I knew in high school and undergrad the day I dropped off my paperwork while I was on leave in Canada last spring, so we chatted for a while in his office - I told him I wanted Infantry but he suggested that I reflect on this a bit - he thought intelligence was the way to go for me due to my experience and background – plus he (quite rightly I imagine) said that running around with the young 20-somethings full of piss and vinegar through all the various training phases might be a bit much – coming in a later age as I would be, he suggested that its probably best to concentrate on my strengths.
What he said does seem to make sense. But I would love have the informed opinion of those of you who might offer some advice on this one – is pursuing Infantry Officer a reasonable choice or more a Quixotic tilt at the windmill considering I will likely be 39 when I hit BOTP (fingers crossed that the security check doesn’t go over 18 months)? To prepare, train and lead men and women (who are someone’s sons, daughters, husbands, wives, brothers and sisters) might not be the ultimate responsibility but if there’s a bigger one I have trouble seeing it. I believe that I do have the maturity, intelligence and integrity for this which comes from my life experience to date - strengths I feel I can bring to command - and I know when I do something my standards are high – I fail at times like we all do – but I always give my best. Part of my success in the UN has been in how I just seem to naturally adapt well with other cultures, I genuinely enjoy this and I would like to be able to apply it in my work with the CF – I assume I might get to apply this more with the Infantry in dealing with civilian populations (i.e. winning minds), be it at home or abroad than with Intelligence – since they are by definition frontline and in greater contact with local populations, be they foreign citizens encountered while patrolling or Canadian when assisting in disaster relief, etc.
Of course, at the end of the day I’ll have to decide what I want to push for myself – but it never hurts to better informed. So if someone has a pointer or two, they will be well received.
I hope I haven’t exceeded any posting length requirements here…thanks for sticking with me. And two thumbs up to Army.ca; it’s a great site and a great resource.
Mike
PS: The “Expat” in Expat Mike is a reference to “Expatriate” and not “Ex-PPCLI” – I hadn’t thought of this connection when first joining. Let me know if this is an unwritten breach of protocol, and I’ll be happy to change my username.