- Reaction score
- 25,203
- Points
- 1,360
That’s why it’s an outlier spot on the card, but these are interesting times.Except the CPC can’t win anything if the PPC gets enough seats to be that sort of support. PPC seats come at the expense of CPC seats.
That’s why it’s an outlier spot on the card, but these are interesting times.Except the CPC can’t win anything if the PPC gets enough seats to be that sort of support. PPC seats come at the expense of CPC seats.
if i vote CPC this year it will be in spite of PP not because of himTechnically you're right.
In practice not so much.
Because of our party system and unofficial adoption of party leader devotion above all MPs don't vote their conscience and constituents, they vote party.
Its like arguing Canadians don't elect PMs. Again technically youre right. Practically, en masse, people vote for the person in their riding from the party leader they like...
You could make an argument that our electoral system is fine, which I don't think it is, what we need to fix if our party system.
Pretty sure Poilievre thoroughly ate the PPC’s lunch. While PPC could still cost the CPC a few seats in close ridings - and while this time around that absolutely could matter - there’s zero prospect of the PPC actually winning any seats outright.Except the CPC can’t win anything if the PPC gets enough seats to be that sort of support. PPC seats come at the expense of CPC seats.
Large CPC is still a very real outcome though and I suspect being held to a minority is the best the LPC can hope for for now.
My bingo card is not anywhere near an LPC victory yet.
Certainly won’t hurt.Carbon tax coming off fuel in the middle of an election might be worth a couple of points
if i vote CPC this year it will be in spite of PP not because of him
Carbon tax coming off fuel in the middle of an election might be worth a couple of points
Agreed.Pretty sure Poilievre thoroughly ate the PPC’s lunch. While PPC could still cost the CPC a few seats in close ridings - and while this time around that absolutely could matter - there’s zero prospect of the PPC actually winning any seats outright.
A hypothetical LPC victory and political collapse for Poilievre could conceivably see a bit of popular support shift back towards PPC, but the poll that means anything would already have happened. I definitely will be checking the data after the election to see if PPC end up meaningfully impacting any races. They probably cost CPC a half dozen seats last time.
John Ivison? I generally like what he writes but not sure he’s up to that task.A progressive candidate with a wealth of experience.
View attachment 91930
you dont think people can vote on policy or you dont think i can?Ummm ok.
And well done to the CPC for forcing that.
you dont think people can vote on policy or you dont think i can?
becauseHuh ? I assume you're an adult and you're free to vote for who ever you wish for what ever reason that works for you.
Why are we talking about you casting a vote ?
Ummm ok.
And well done to the CPC for forcing that.
because
If the poll slip for the LPC again, I can see them considering a common sense firearms act... Anything to hold power.
I'd love to see a LPC that didn't consider me worse than actual criminals, but that may be asking for too much.I would love to see that.
I mean their firearms legislation does as much for public safety as carbon tax does to help the environment.
Maybe the precedence is set now to walk back ineffective policies?
Has worked for Doug Ford. I’m fine with walking back bad policy.I would love to see that.
I mean their firearms legislation does as much for public safety as carbon tax does to help the environment.
Maybe the precedence is set now to walk back ineffective policies?
I think that's why he's my favourite politician right now. Certainly not afraid to say "Oop's, my bad."Has worked for Doug Ford. I’m fine with walking back bad policy.