Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,689
- Points
- 1,260
You know what will be more expensive?
Not funding Ukraine.
Assumption. Canada will have nothing to offer other than condolences and statements assuming Russia advances beyond Ukraine.
You know what will be more expensive?
Not funding Ukraine.
You are aware that Canada is one of the richest countries in the world? We aren't some poor backwater struggling to get by, regardless of how we feel...Assumption. Canada will have nothing to offer other than condolences and statements assuming Russia advances beyond Ukraine.
There's millions lining up at food banks and tens of thousands more living in trudeauville tent cities that wouldn't agree with you. Our national debt makes us virtually penniless. Our military is damaged almost beyond repair, has three days of ammo and we've given away much of our equipment.You are aware that Canada is one of the richest countries in the world? We aren't some poor backwater struggling to get by, regardless of how we feel...
We need responsible government, and a responsible government would see that funding the fight in Ukraine is worth every penny.
So, another reason why we should contribute to making sure Russia doesn’t do that.Assumption. Canada will have nothing to offer other than condolences and statements assuming Russia advances beyond Ukraine.
Sure, if the Conservatives want to make sure they never get elected in the West again.When PP is elected the chances of aid being cut off completely is very low, but it’ll be on the list of fat to trim, along with the carbon tax and CBC.
FTFYWe're only as rich as the resources that wecan'tare explicitly being prohibited by our Great Leader to get at.
I watched Nick Nanos on CTV last night and he all but directly said it, Trudeau has zero chance. Like none. It doesn't matter what he offers. Nanos even said PP could screw up a bunch of things and still looks to remain in majority territory.
Ummm, it was all Harper's fault. Come on, everyone knows thatIronically, Trudeau needs to come up with solutions to the mess his government created, but he won't, he'll double down on his useless policies, programs and taxes. The country is much worse off than it was 9 years ago, everything is in crisis. You can't keep blaming covid, ukraine, hamas, or whatever else nonsense that deflects accountability.
That would be true, if other western countries with right leaning governments aren’t going through the same thing issues.The country is much worse off than it was 9 years ago, everything is in crisis. You can't keep blaming covid, ukraine, hamas, or whatever else nonsense that deflects accountability.
But take a look through the Australia subreddit and you’ll see many of the same issues.
If "the west" isn't prepared to support Ukraine adequately to defeat Russia, then what "the west" is funding is a war of attrition to write down Russian resources. Some have openly expressed exactly that idea as an objective.We need responsible government, and a responsible government would see that funding the fight in Ukraine is worth every penny.
He's not the only long-time Team Red booster saying the same thing. Two of the guys on this podcast have worked for Liberal governments (federal and Ontario) for a long time, and they've been saying the same thing for quite a while.... I watched Nick Nanos on CTV last night and he all but directly said it, Trudeau has zero chance. Like none. It doesn't matter what he offers ...
Don't know if I'd agree with that yet, but 20-ish points of lead is quite comfortable to have, even this far out before an election. All that advertising mid-later last year plus generally good message discipline has paid off for PP so far.... Nanos even said PP could screw up a bunch of things and still looks to remain in majority territory.
One of the biggest anti-Trudeau campaigners is Warren Kinsella, one of Jean Chretein's key men.Circling back to PP as odds-on next PM ...
He's not the only long-time Team Red booster saying the same thing. Two of the guys on this podcast have worked for Liberal governments (federal and Ontario) for a long time, and they've been saying the same thing for quite a while.
Don't know if I'd agree with that yet, but 20-ish points of lead is quite comfortable to have, even this far out before an election. All that advertising mid-later last year plus generally good message discipline has paid off for PP so far.
And, as Shakespeare wrote, sharper than a serpent's tooth ....
Also archived here if previous link doesn't work.‘He’s a liar and a hate-monger’: Former prime minister Kim Campbell slams Pierre Poilievre
The former Progressive Conservative leader says "the choices are not great for me" when considering how to vote in the next federal election.www.thestar.com
Yup. Elsewhere on the boards, this guy's advice was discussed, too (archived link also here) ....One of the biggest anti-Trudeau campaigners is Warren Kinsella, one of Jean Chretein's key men.
That would be true, if other western countries with right leaning governments aren’t going through the same thing issues.
The UK has a Conservative govt. The Australians have a Conservative govt (they call it “Liberal” but it means “small govt” as opposed to the Labour Party).
No, not everything is the same between Canada and Australia, but those countries are probably as close as you’ll get for comparison purposes. But take a look through the Australia subreddit and you’ll see many of the same issues.
Unlike our current government, I'm pretty sure the CPC are well versed in the art of contingency planning.Better to be ready to fight tonight than start a 6 week training program 4 weeks before the match.The CPC seems to be working on filling its war chest in preparation for….ummm….October 2025…
Poilievre holds campaign-style rally in Toronto
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was greeted with thousands of supporters at a campaign style rally in Toronto.www.ctvnews.ca