• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2025 Federal Election - 28 Apr 25

Not a single government has solved the water issue on FN, it's a continued failure of our society. Most FN issues get ignored, we still treat them as second class citizens, possibly even lower. It's the underlying racism in our society and our government structure that's self defeating.
There is a remote northern rez in Mb - I was going to go up there and try to teach the locals about suicide prevention. The water main broke and the maintenance guy had departed the area.
The issue is that none of the locals has the experience, knowledge and where with all to fix things. They depend on outsiders to run things for them. And the same goes for water treatment plants.

AND to add: its not just racism by the white people towards the Indigenous.
 
Poilievre is showing Carney what being an ethical leader looks like.
Does it though? many of the CPC's candidates have been in place for the past two years, tossing three candidates a week into an election, who have been candidates for awhile, If I was Pierre I'd be asking some hard questions about the parties vetting protocols. As it looks like three bad candidates got through which now embarrassed the CPC, did he or the party take decisive action? sure but seems like there were failures to lead to this moment in the vetting of candidates. Either that or they didn't think it was a big deal until it was made public, hoping people wouldnt find out
 
In 2007, Carney was named Governor of the Bank of Canada. Who was the PM who made that decision?
No one. Because the Prime Minister doesn't appoint the governor of the Bank of Canada. The Bank of Canada's board of directors appoints the governor.

The Prime Minister can block an appointment if they have sufficient reason to do so, but otherwise has no involvement in the process.


 
Well we did have the Rhinoceros Party who promised to do nothing.
Lead by the best Prime Minister we never had.

jim-lahey-lahey.gif
 
Union members have been ignoring their local executives endorsements for about a decade down here. They have been voting for who they want. In fact, many get pissed when they are told who to vote for by the ununion.
Who the hell does any union think they are, telling people who to vote for??

Imagine having the arrogance to tell a group of people you look out for at work who they should vote for, in an official capacity...unreal...


I remember growing up, my parents used to tell us it was rude to ask someone directly who they planned to vote for. And if politics came up at a social dinner with the neighbours, it was to remain fairly light & generalized just as a course of good manners.

The idea that a union would encourage it's members to vote a certain way just seems jaw dropping to me...
 
Draw your own conclusions, but when I hear a liberal saying 'emergency powers' I get a tad skittish.

I don't think anybody blames you!

Especially this liberal....yyyiiikkeesss
 
It's been claimed on this site that Butts is part of Carney's team, and thus why a Carney government would be just more of Trudeau.

However, I can't find any official mention of him joining team Carney. He's only mentioned as having joined his team in a few "hit pieces" by news sites that tend to have significant right leaning bias.

Has anyone seen anything that says that Butts really has left his day job to join Carney's campaign?
 
He was sitting in the front row at the swearing in. Nothing official, but I’m sure that Butts is a hero in most LPC circles and a reminder of LPC failures in others.
Has anyone seen anything that says that Butts really has left his day job to join Carney's campaign?
 
I would like to point out that Canada still fields not 1 but 2 Communist inspired parties in our Federal Elections.

The Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada - which still fields candidates in my old home city of Windsor, Ontario
I'm 'happy' to see that they have once against upheld this tradition and have a candidate in the riding of Windsor-Tecumseh - as well as Hamilton East-Stoney Creek in the last Ontario Provincial election


The Communist Party of Canada - which just announced their candidate for the riding of Hamilton Mountain

 
It's been claimed on this site that Butts is part of Carney's team, and thus why a Carney government would be just more of Trudeau.

However, I can't find any official mention of him joining team Carney. He's only mentioned as having joined his team in a few "hit pieces" by news sites that tend to have significant right leaning bias.

Has anyone seen anything that says that Butts really has left his day job to join Carney's campaign?

I haven’t actually seen anything, no. While lack of proof is not proof of lack, I feel that given how much team blue wants to tie Carney to Trudeau, they would likely capitalize on and loudly trumpet ties to Butts, Telford etc. instead the cries of “Trudeau-Carney” liberals seem to have somewhat faded.
 
Does it though? many of the CPC's candidates have been in place for the past two years,
Yes.
Our political parties doing a shitty job vetting candidates and appointments is hardly breaking news. Remember the pick for head of the Canadian Human Rights Commission? And previous GG?

They either knew about it and hoped it wouldn't surface or more likely never bothered to do a deep dive before but decided to do one now.
 

I remember growing up, my parents used to tell us it was rude to ask someone directly who they planned to vote for. And if politics came up at a social dinner with the neighbours, it was to remain fairly light & generalized just as a course of good manners.

Your parents taught you well.

Who the hell does any union think they are, telling people who to vote for??

Imagine having the arrogance to tell a group of people you look out for at work who they should vote for, in an official capacity...unreal...

The idea that a union would encourage it's members to vote a certain way just seems jaw dropping to me...


This is the IAFF Endorsement Philosophy.

The IAFF Endorsement Philosophy​


The IAFF believes, respects, and celebrates the absolute right of every IAFF member to vote for the candidate they feel best represents and embraces their views and political philosophy. No one, including your union, has the right to tell you how to vote.
Similarly, the IAFF will never criticize any member for their choice of candidate. We recognize that many issues beyond fire service and labor issues are important to all IAFF members, and the IAFF respects members’ right to vote for candidates who have not won the endorsement of the IAFF or your local affiliate.
However, just like IAFF members review each candidate’s history, positions, and platform and make a decision based on that information, so does the IAFF.
This union views candidates with a very narrow focus. Decisions are predicated on how candidates stand on fire fighter and labor issues, such as collective bargaining rights, protection of fair labor standards (FLSA) and overtime rights, pay fairness and equity for federal fire fighters, presumption of disability for federal fire fighters, funding for first responder initiatives, full funding of the FIRE Act and SAFER programs, protection of pension and Social Security benefits, and protection and extension of health care benefits for active and retired members, to name a few.
These are the types of issues that IAFF FIREPAC focuses on when making decisions on whether or not to support a candidate. IAFF FIREPAC does not and will not base its decisions on issues such as Second Amendment rights, reproductive rights, the environment or other social issues that many of our members hold firm beliefs about.
The IAFF believes, respects, and celebrates the absolute right of every IAFF member to vote for the candidate they feels best represents and embraces their views and political philosophy. No one, including your union, can tell you how to vote. However, just like IAFF members review the history, positions and platform of each candidate and make a decision based on that information, so does the IAFF.
The IAFF has one mission: to improve the lives and livelihoods of professional fire fighters. We know that one of the most important ways we represent our members is in the legislatures at all levels of government – because that’s where most of the decisions are made that have an impact on our members and their jobs. That’s why we play hard in politics – so that we help get people elected who will push our legislative agenda forward.
In that role, this union is an advocacy group similar to the NRA, Christian Coalition, Sierra Club, Chamber of Commerce, National League of Cities, etc. Our range of issues is very specific. No one should expect or accept it if the NRA based endorsements on fire fighter bargaining rights. Likewise, no one expects the Christian Coalition to base its support of candidates on funding the FIRE Act or SAFER grants. Consequently, no one should expect the IAFF to base its endorsement on anything other than its specific set of issues.
While you may personally disagree with an IAFF endorsement and believe that another candidate better represents your own viewpoint on issues important to you, please be mindful that the IAFF endorsement is about the candidate’s stance on fire service and labor issues. And, just like the IAFF respects your right to vote for the candidate of your choosing, we ask for the same respect concerning the IAFF’s duty to make its endorsement based on fire service, employment, safety and health, and labor issues that directly affect our members’ lives and livelihood.
In any union, association, or even political party, when an organization endorses a particular candidate or a specific position on any issue, not everyone who is a member is in agreement. In fact, almost every time an endorsement is made, there is disagreement – but it’s usually based on personal political leanings or how one values certain issues. People are entitled to and respect their right to disagree and express their own opinions.
Politics within the IAFF is an issue of mutual respect. The IAFF respects its members’ right to vote for whomever they choose, and we hope you respect the IAFF’s right to endorse candidates, regardless of party, who have demonstrated their support for the IAFF and professional fire fighters. The IAFF also respects the right of state and individual affiliates to endorse the candidate they believe will best represent their membership at the state and local level.



 
if the law doesn't
FFS. People are swallowing bullshit conservative propaganda hook line and sinker. This is nothing more than the conservatives obfuscating an issue by using bullshit buzzards to trick Canadians. They are lying.

Bill C-69 is NOT anti-pipeline legislation. It does not ban pipelines. It's a bill that changed the way that environmental assessments and approvals are done. What Carney has said is that provinces won't necessarily have to adhere to the processes laid out by this federal law, if instead they provide their own provincial environmental assessment. He's basically paving the way for provinces to potentially enact token environmental assessment laws so thag the feds cna wash their hands of the responsibility while still appearing to be all for strong environmental regulation.

But the conservative slap a made up bullshit name like "anti pipeline bill" and people to lazy to look into anything themselves believe it, and therefor when Carney says he won't repeal it, it makes it look like he's keeping in place an law that bans pipelines, when no such law exists.

Do better, people.
exist, then there should be at least two or three pipelines in the pipe so to speak that have been approved in the last 2 years. The market is certainly there; we had representatives from both Germany and Japan over here trying to invest so with their interest there should be one going in each direction. Would you please point these pending projects out to me?
 
Back
Top