Talk:Armour - Revision history

Conz at 15:44, 25 May 2006

2006-05-25T15:44:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 25 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh\|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)		:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh\|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)






	Thanks Michael		Thanks Michael

Conz at 00:05, 24 May 2006

2006-05-24T00:05:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 23 May 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:
	PS		PS

	I'll get the hang of this yet. I would like to figure out a "Back to Top" for those extremely long pages that you can't get away from at times.		I'll get the hang of this yet. I would like to figure out a "Back to Top" for those extremely long pages that you can't get away from at times. Do I have to add the time myself? It is 232004 May 2006

Conz at 00:03, 24 May 2006

2006-05-24T00:03:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 23 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh\|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)		:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh\|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)

			Thanks Michael

			I found that there was too much info on the first page, so to shorten it I moved it out. Someone else had started it, and it was rather cluttered. I cleaned it up, but have added other options/links such as Camp Flags. I was also thinking of doing the Cap badges.

			Michael

			As you are more familiar with this program, could you link the Camp Flags and then the Cap Badges into Categories as they develop? I was trying to keep them by Corps for now, but I imagine a master list may also come in handy.

			Thanks

			George

			PS

			I'll get the hang of this yet. I would like to figure out a "Back to Top" for those extremely long pages that you can't get away from at times.

Walford at 18:17, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T18:17:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 23 May 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Information is easier to find if we apply a common template.		Information is easier to find if we apply a common template.

	Any thoughts? [[User:DAPaterson]]		Any thoughts? [[User:DAPaterson\|DAPaterson]] 11:56, 23 May 2006 (EDT)


	:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh\|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)		:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh\|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)

Walford at 18:16, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T18:16:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 23 May 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Information is easier to find if we apply a common template.		Information is easier to find if we apply a common template.

	Any thoughts?		Any thoughts? [[User:DAPaterson]]

			:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh\|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)

Cj6 at 17:56, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T17:56:04Z

New page

Do we need a standard template for the Arms pages? The Infantry and Engineer pages include the list of units on the main page; the Armd corps has a distinct "Regiments" page.

Information is easier to find if we apply a common template.

Any thoughts?