• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Think Tank: Almost 3/4 of AFG has Taliban "permanent presence"?

The Bread Guy

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
3,010
Points
1,260
Also, name change watch - goodbye "Senlis Council", hello "International Council on Security and Development (ICOS)".  Still no report on the web page - will share once posted.  Shared in accordance with the "fair dealing" provisions, Section 29, of the Copyright Act.

Taliban In 72 Percent Of Afghanistan, Think Tank Says
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 8 Dec 08
Article link

The Taliban hold a permanent presence in 72 percent of Afghanistan, a think tank has said, but NATO and the Afghan government rejected the report, saying its figures were not credible.

The findings by the International Council on Security and Development (ICOS) come in the wake of a series of critical reports on Western-led military and development efforts to put an end to the seven-year Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan.

The U.S. government is conducting a wide-ranging review of strategy aimed at countering the Taliban guerrilla and bombing campaign which analysts agree has grown in both scale and scope in the last year.

But while the trends in the ICOS report reflected prevailing sentiment on Afghanistan, many of its findings appeared flawed and contained some glaring errors, security analysts said.

"The Taliban now has a permanent presence in 72 percent of the country," ICOS, formerly known as the Senlis Council, said in the report, adding that the figure had risen from 54 percent last year.

ICOS is an independent think tank and research organization based in Brazil that has researchers in the region.

The report defines a permanent presence as an average of one or more insurgent attacks per week over the entire year.

Figures 'Not Credible'

According to ICOS, a "permanent presence" then would include many areas of the country where the Taliban traditionally launch a large number of attacks in the spring and summer "fighting season," before melting away during the harsh winter months.

"We don't see the figures in this report as being credible at all," said NATO spokesman James Appathurai. "The Taliban are only present in the south and east, which is already less than 50 percent of the country."

The Afghan government also rejected the report and said "in addition to the questionable methodology of the report and its conceptual confusion, the report has misinterpreted the sporadic, terrorizing, and media-oriented activities of the Taliban."

At least 4,000 people have been killed in fighting in Afghanistan this year, around one-third of them civilians, according to United Nations figures.

In the traditional Taliban heartlands of the mainly ethnic Pashtun south and east, NATO-led and U.S.-led coalition forces are engaged in daily clashes with militants fighting to overthrow the Afghan government and drive out foreign troops.

But the insurgents generally shy away from massed attacks against Afghan and international troops, preferring "shoot-and-scoot" ambushes, backed by roadside and suicide bomb attacks.

The Taliban, said Appathurai, "don't control any areas where Afghan and international forces are present. Whenever Afghan or international forces patrol into an area they simply run away."

"So the idea that the Taliban control large swathes of the country is simply impossible," Appathurai said.

'Closing A Noose'

ICOS said the Taliban are "closing a noose" around the Afghan capital, Kabul, "establishing bases close to the city from which to launch attacks...Using these bases, the Taliban and insurgent attacks in Kabul have increased dramatically."

While the Taliban have built up a presence in provinces just to the south, west, and east of Kabul in the last year, the number of insurgent attacks inside the city has actually gone down this year, the UN says.

That is largely due to a much stronger and highly visible police presence in the city in response to a series of high-profile suicide attacks in Kabul last year.

ICOS said Kabul was "virtually Taliban-free a year ago" and said in the city there were "no police checkpoints at night and few in the day."

An ICOS map of Kabul also showed the area occupied by the U.S. Embassy, the sprawling NATO headquarters, and the Afghan presidential palace as one of "high Taliban/criminal activity."



- edited to fix grammar in subject line -
 
More now available from the ICOS web page on the latest report:

2007
taliban_map


vs. 2008
taliban_pres_map


ICOS Sitrep, Dec 08
http://www.icosgroup.net/modules/reports/struggle_for_kabul/situation_update

Proposed New Approach?
http://www.icosgroup.net/modules/reports/struggle_for_kabul/inverting_pyramid
 
A bit more of the rest of the story, via CanWest:
Canada’s ambassador to Afghanistan says a foreign-policy think-tank founded by a Vancouver lawyer is giving a boost to the Taliban.

Ambassador Ron Hoffmann called a finding by the International Council on Security and Development (ICOS) that the Taliban have a permanent presence across 72 per cent of Afghanistan "puzzling" and "off the mark."  .... "Whenever a Senlis report comes out it tends to be a day of celebration for the Taliban propaganda machine," Hoffmann said Monday.

(....)

"The Canadian military, I think, have been doing the best that they can given the assignment and the political restrictions on their work," (ICOS' Norine) MacDonald said Monday. "Sadly, we are not seeing any significant impact from our development and aid portfolio. The military are really fighting in an environment that allows the Taliban to recruit quite easily and turn the locals against us."

(....)

ICOS based its calculations of Taliban presence on violent attacks chronicled in media reports and public documents, deeming an area as having permanent Taliban presence if it averaged one or more attacks per week.

Using such a measure alone can provide a false picture, said Stephen Biddle, an Afghanistan expert with the U.S.-based Council on Foreign Relations. In southern Afghanistan, the Taliban have given up trying to overrun NATO positions, and have resorted in large part to improvised-explosive devices, Biddle said.

"They moved to a method that caused the incident count to go up dramatically, even if the number of Taliban doing it didn’t change, or even went down," Biddle said....
 
I grow tired of those who would undermine our efforts, whether they do it innocently (which is excusable due to ignorance of the situation) or those that deliberately set out to undermine our troops.
Excuse me, but I am somewhat emotionally drained.
 
With all due respect to Ambassador Ron Hoffmann, we still have regular attacks, presumably by the enemy, in various Southern and Eastern provinces and, recently, we have seen increased enemy attacks in the North and around Kabul. It sure looks like the enemy is active in more and more regions.

It may be an error to use the term Taliban too often - it appears to me that we are fighting more than just the old, pre-2001 Taliban. But it also may be an error to try to sugarcoat the news.

More attacks in more places is not good news, to me.

 
A post by Raphael Alexander:

ICOS/Senlis Report On Afghanistan Flawed Methodology
http://unambig.blogspot.com/2008/12/icossenlis-report-on-afghanistan-flawed.html

Mark
Ottawa
 
It's all bullshyte. Alarmist propaganda at it's best.

Way to feed the Taliban IO campaign.

Regards
 
Back
Top