- Reaction score
- 146
- Points
- 710
As far as I can see there still in no contract, but things seem moving:
SALIS’ Sibling: NATO’s C-17 Pool Inaugurates In-House Heavy Lift
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/salis-sibling-natos-c17-pool-inaugurates-inhouse-heavy-lift-02630/
More:
Government Decision on Strategic Transport Aircraft
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi-bin/client/modele.pl?session=dae.34806081.1205929004.OelbM38AAAEAAA--AEQAAAAD&manuel_call_prod=92349&manuel_call_mod=release&modele=jdc_inter
Mark
Ottawa
SALIS’ Sibling: NATO’s C-17 Pool Inaugurates In-House Heavy Lift
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/salis-sibling-natos-c17-pool-inaugurates-inhouse-heavy-lift-02630/
The long-range C-17 Globemaster III heavy transport aircraft remains the backbone of US Air Mobility Command inter-theater transport around the world, and its ability to operate from shorter and rougher runways has made it especially useful during the Global War on Terror. Recent buys by Australia, Britain, and Canada have broadened the plane’s its global use. Now NATO, who has relied on the SALIS arrangement and its leased super-giant AN-124s from Russia, is looking to buy and own 3-4 C-17s as NATO pooled assets with multinational crews. Participating countries will receive allocated flight hours relative to their participation (a Dutch MinDef release says they expect 500 flight hours per year for EUR 10-15 million per year over 30 years), and thus far they include: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United States.
This order will not materially change the coming shut-down of C-17 production, but it does look like the inauguration of a pool that will fill a gaping hole in Europe’s defense capabilities – its complete lack of heavy airlift. This article will cover NATO C-17 acquisition program, including its structure and ongoing announcements. Program is actually a misnomer so far. There has been talk so far, but no concrete agreements, despite an originally-planned in-service date of late 2007…
More:
Government Decision on Strategic Transport Aircraft
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi-bin/client/modele.pl?session=dae.34806081.1205929004.OelbM38AAAEAAA--AEQAAAAD&manuel_call_prod=92349&manuel_call_mod=release&modele=jdc_inter
The Government has reached a decision on Swedish participation in the multinational Strategic Airlift Capability (SAC) which gives Sweden access to three Boeing C-17 heavy transport aircraft.
The transport aircraft, in use by many countries including the United States and the United Kingdom, has a length of 53 metres and can carry, for example, two Type 10 or two Type 15 helicopters, a Fast Attack Craft or two CV90 combat armoured vehicles. It is capable of landing on poorly prepared airstrips and can operate in areas where the threat level is high.
-- Safe and rapid transportation
Sweden has for a long time been negotiating to join with 14 other nations in a collaborative arrangement giving participants access to a pool of three C-17 heavy transport aircraft to provide safe and rapid transportation to and from operational areas.
Sweden intends to purchase 550 flight hours annually. The aircraft are formally owned by NATO but this does not affect their operational use so NATO has, for example, no control over the way in which Sweden makes use of this resource.
-- Parliamentary decision in the summer
The Government’s decision concerning Swedish participation in the SAC presupposes endorsement by the Swedish parliament. Parliamentary endorsement is expected early this summer. The SAC agreement will only come into force when it has been signed by all participating countries.
“The first aircraft is due to be delivered in November with the other two following in spring and summer next year. But we expect to be able to make use of this facility even before the end of the year, albeit with reduced operational capacity,” says Fredrik Hedén at Swedish Armed Forces Headquarters, who has been leading the Swedish team in these negotiations...
Mark
Ottawa